Towards validating prediction systems for process understandability: Measuring process understandability

Proceedings of the 2008 10th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing, SYNASC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 564-571

  Melcher, Joachim ^a   Seese, Detlef ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Measurement approach; Metric; Process understandability

Indexed keywords

EXTERNAL PROCESS; METRIC; PREDICTION SYSTEMS; PROCESS METRICS; PROCESS UNDERSTANDABILITY; REAL VALUES; RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; SOFTWARE METRICS; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

COMPUTATION THEORY;

METRIC SYSTEM;

EID: 70449509514     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SYNASC.2008.24     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. J. Melcher and D. Seese, "Process measurement: Insights from software measurement on measuring process complexity, quality and performance," Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Institut AIFB, Research Report, 2008, http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/1000009225.
2. J. Mendling, H. A. Reijers, and J. Cardoso, "What makes process models understandable?" in Business Process Management: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference BPM 2007, ser. LNCS, G. Alonso, P. Dadam, and M. Rosemann, Eds., vol. 4714, 2007, pp. 48-63.
3. J. Melcher and D. Seese, "Towards validating prediction systems for process understandability: Measuring process understandability (experimental results)," Universität Karlsruhe (TH), Institut AIFB, Research Report, 2008, http://digbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de/volltexte/1000009260.
4. I. Vanderfeesten, H. A. Reijers, J. Mendling, W. M. P. van der Aalst, and J. Cardoso, "On a quest for good process models: The cross-connectivity metric," in Advanced Information Systems Engineering: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference CAiSE 2008, ser. LNCS, Z. Bellahséne and M. Léonard, Eds., vol. 5074, 2008, pp. 480-494.
5. J. Mendling and M. Strembeck, "Influence factors of understanding business process models," in Business Information Systems: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference BIS 2008, ser. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, W. Abramowicz and D. Fensel, Eds., vol. 7, 2008, pp. 142-153.
6. N. E. Fenton and S. L. Pfleeger, Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach, 2nd ed. International Thomson Computer Press, 1996.
7. S. H. Kan, Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
8. R. E. Mayer, "Models for understanding," Review of Educational Research, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 43-64, 1989.
9. A. Gemino and Y. Wand, "Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning," Communications of the ACM, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 79-84, 2003.
10. S. S. Shapiro and M. B. Wilk, "An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples)," Biometrika, vol. 52, no. 3-4, pp. 591-611, 1965.
11. M. J. Panik, Advanced Statistics from an Elementary Point of View. Elsevier Academic Press, 2005.
12. B. Efron and R. J. Tibshirani, An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman & Hall, 1993.