All aboard? Evidence-based management and the future of management scholarship

International Public Management Journal

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 289-309

  Michael, Barzelay ^a   Fred, Thompson ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b WILLAMETTE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70449389189     PISSN: 10967494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10967490903094087     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AACSB. 2008a. Final Report of the AACSB International Impact of Research Task Force. Tampa, FL: Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. http://www.aacsb.edu/resource_centers/research/Final/Impact_of_Research_Report-FINAL.PDF.
2. AACSB. 2008b. Final Version of Controversial Report on Business School Research Issued, news release, February 20. http://www.aacsb.edu/Resource_Centers/Research/IOR-release2-08.pdf.
3. Bardach, E. 2004. The Extrapolation Problem: How Can We Learn from the Experience of Others? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 23(2): 205-220.
4. Cascio, W. F. 2007. Evidence-Based Management and the Marketplace for Ideas. The Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1009-1012.
5. Cohen, D. J. 2007. The Very Separate Worlds of Academic and Practitioner Publications in Human Resource Management: Reasons for the Divide and Concrete Solutions for Bridging the Gap. The Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1013-1019.
6. Ghoshal, S. 2005. Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1): 75-91.
7. Hood, C. and M. Jackson. 1991. Administrative Argument. London: Dartmouth.
8. Hulin, C.2001.Applied Psychology and Science: Differences Between Research and Practice. Applied Psychology 50(2): 225-234.
9. Jonsen, A. and S. Toulmin. 1988. The Abuse of Casuistry. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Kallinikos, J. 2002. Reopening the Black Box of Technology: Artifacts and Human Agency. London: Department of Information Systems, London School of Economics.
11. Kelman, S. 2005. Public Management Needs Help. Academy of Management Journal 48(6): 967-969.
12. Latham, G. P. 2007. A Speculative Perspective on the Transfer of Behavioral Science Findings to the Workplace: 'The Times They Are A-Changin.' Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1027-1032.
13. Lawler, E. E. 2007. Why HR Practices Are Not Evidence-Based. The Academy of Manage-ment Journal 50(5): 1033-1036.
14. Lax, D. A. and J. K. Sebenius. 1986. The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain. New York: The Free Press.
15. Lindblom, C. E. and D. K. Cohen. 1979. Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16. Locke, E. A. and G. P. Latham. 2002. Building a Practically Useful Theory of Goal Setting and Task Motivation: A 35-Year Odyssey. American Psychologist 57(9) 705-717.
17. Majone, G. 1989. Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Malhotra, Y. 2004. Why Knowledge Management Systems Fail? Enablers and Constraints of Knowledge Management in Human Enterprises. Pp. 87-112 in M. E. D. Koenig and T. K. Srikantaiah, eds., Knowledge Management Lessons Learned: What Works and What Doesn't. American Society for Information Science and Technology Monograph Series. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
19. Malhotra, Y. and D. Galletta. 2005. A Multidimensional Commitment Model of Volitional Systems Adoption and Usage Behavior. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(1): 117-151.
20. Mashaw, J. 1983. Bureaucratic Justice. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21. Meyer, J. W. and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340-363.
22. Mintzberg, H. 1979. The Structure of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Orlikowski, W. J. and S. R. Barley. 2001. Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from each Other? MIS Quarterly 25(2): 145-165.
24. Pfeffer, J. and R. I. Sutton. 2006. Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
25. Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26. Romme, A. G. L. 2003. Making a Difference: Organization as Design. Organization Science 14: 558-573.
27. Rousseau, D. M. 2006. Is There Such a Thing as Evidence-Based Management? Academy of Management Review 31(2): 256-269.
28. Rousseau, D. M. 2007. A Sticky, Leveraging, and Scalable Strategy for High-Quality Connections Between Organizational Practice and Science. The Academy of Manage-ment Journal 50: 1037-1042.
29. Rousseau, D. M. and S. McCarthy. 2007. Educating Managers from an Evidence-Based Perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education 6(1): 84-101.
30. Rynes, S. L. 2007. Editor's Afterword-Let's Create a Tipping Point: What Academics and Practitioners Can Do, Alone and Together. Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1046-1054.
31. Rynes, S. L. 2007. Editor's Foreword: Tackling the 'Great Divide' Between Research Production and Dissemination in Human Resource Management. Academy of Manage-ment Journal 50(5): 985-986.
32. Rynes, S. L., T. Giluk, and K. G. Brown. 2007. The Very Separate Worlds of Academic and Practitioner Periodicals in Human Resource Management: Implications for Evidence-Based Management. Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 987-1008.
33. Saari, L. 2007. Bridging the Worlds. Academy of Management Journal 50(5): 1043-1045.
34. Simon, H. A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Tsoukas, H. 1996. Forms of Knowledge and Forms of Life in Organized Contexts. Pp. 43-66 in Robert C. H. Chia, ed., In the Realm of Organization-Essays for Robert Cooper. London: Routledge.
36. Tsoukas, H. and S. Cummings. 1997. Marginalization and Recovery: The Emergence of Aristotelian Themes in Organization Studies. Organization Studies 18(4): 655-683.
37. Walton, D. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Walton, D. 2006. Examination Dialogue: An Argumentation Framework for Critically Questioning an Expert Opinion. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 745-777.
39. Weick, K. 2001. Small Wins: Redefining the Scale of Social Problems. Pp. 426-444 in K. E. Weick, ed., Making Sense of the Organization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
40. Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.