The validity of in vivo tooth volume determinations from cone-beam computed tomography

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 160-166

  Liu, Yi ^a   Olszewski, Raphael ^b   Alexandroni, Emanuel Stefan ^c   Enciso, Reyes ^c   Xu, Tianmin ^a   Mah, James K ^c  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY SCHOOL AND HOSPITAL OF STOMATOLOGY   (China)

^b CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cone beam ct; Orthodontic; Radiographic; Segmentation; Tooth volume

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; ORGAN SIZE; PILOT STUDY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BICUSPID; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODONTOMETRY; ORGAN SIZE; PILOT PROJECTS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70449346186     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2319/121608-639.1     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mah J, Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:308-309.
2. Macchi A, Carrafiello G, Cacciafesta V, Antonio OA. Threedimensional digital modeling and setup. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129:605-610.
3. Garino F, Garino G. Computer-aided interactive in direct bonding. Prog Orthod.2005;6:214-223.
4. Garino F, Garino GB. Digital treatment objectives: procedure and clinical application. Prog Orthod.2004;5:248-256.
5. Wiechmann D, Rummel V, Thalheim A, Simon JS, Wiechmann L. Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:593-599.
6. Robiony M, Salvo I, Costa F, Zerman N, Bandera C, Filippi S, Felice M, Politi M. Accuracy of virtual reality and stereolithographic models in maxillo-facial surgical planning. J Craniofac Surg.2008;19:482-489.
7. Toso F, Zuiani C, Vergendo M, Salvo I, Robiony M, Politi M, Bazzocchi M. Usefulness of computed tomography in pre-surgical evaluation of maxillo-facial pathology with rapid prototyping and surgical pre-planning by virtual reality. Radiol Med.2005;110:665-675.
8. Aamodt A, Kvistad KA, Andersen E, Lundlarsen J, Eine J, Benum P, Husby OS. Determination of the Hounsfield value for CT-based design of custom femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br.1999;81:143-144.
9. Prevrhal S, Engelke K, Kalender WA. Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. Phys Med Biol.1999;44:751-764.
10. Anderson RW, Lamb RD, McGarrah HE, Eick JD. Root surface measurements of mandibular molars using sterophotogrammetry. J Am Dent Assoc.1983;107:613-615.
11. Marmulla R, Wörtche R, Mühling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 Cone Beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol.2005;34:28-31.
12. Kobayashi K, Shimoda S, Nakagawa Y, Yamamoto A. Accuracy in measurements of distance using limited conebeam computerized tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants.2004;19:228-230.
13. Holberg C, Steinhäuser S, Geis P, Rudzki-Janson I. Conebeam computed tomography in orthodontics: benefits and limitations. J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66:434-444.
14. Loubele M, Jacobs R, Maes F, et al. Image quality versus radiation dose of four cone beam computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol.2008;37:309-318.
15. Mah J, Redmond R. The evolution of digital study models. J Clin Orthod.2007;41:557-561.
16. Hujoel PP. A meta-analysis of normal ranges for root surface areas of the permanent dentition. J Clin Periodontol.1994;21:225-229.
17. Crabb JJ, Wilson HJ. A method of measuring root areas of extracted teeth. J Dent. 1974:171-174.
18. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed. St Louis, Mo: Mosby; 2000.
19. Harrell WE, Hatcher DC, Bolt RL. In search of anatomic truth: 3-dimensional digital modeling and the future of orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122:325-330.
20. Agbaje JO, Jacobs R, Maes F, Michiels K, Steenberghe VD. Volumetric analysis of extraction sockets using cone beam computed tomography: a pilot study on ex vivo jaw bone. J Clin Periodontol.2007;34:985-990.
21. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol.2008;37: 80-93.
22. Forbes G, Gehring DG, Gorman CA, Brennan MD, Jackson IT. Volume measurements of normal orbital structures by computed tomographic analysis. Am J Roentgenol.1985; 145:149-154. (Pubitemid 15022887)
23. Jensen J, Kragskov J, Wenzel A, Sindet-Pedersen S. In vitro analysis of the accuracy of subtraction radiography and computed tomography scanning for determination of bone graft volume. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:743-748.
24. Loubele M, Maes F, Schutyser F, Marchal G, Jacobs R, Suetens P. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod.2006; 102:225-234.
25. Shi H, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Three-dimensional reconstruction of individual cervical vertebrae from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131:426-432.
26. Gateno J, Xia J, Teichgraeber JF, Rosen A. A new technique for the creation of a computerized composite skull model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg.2003;61:222-227.
27. Krsek P, Spanel M, Krupa P, Marek I, Cernochova P. Teeth and jaw 3D reconstruction in stomatology. International Conference on Medical Information Visualisation - Bio-Medical Visualisation. IEEE Conference Proc. 2007;23-28.