Six-month clinical evaluation of two dentin adhesives applied on dry vs moist dentin

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 343-352

  Perdigão, Jorge ^a   Carmo, André R P ^b   Geraldeli, Saulo ^a,c   Dutra, Hélio R ^c   Masuda, Milton S ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDADE DE MOGI DAS CRUZES   (Brazil)

^c Department of Oral Sciences ^*

^d UNIVERSITY OF SANTO AMARO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ALCOHOL; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; PHOSPHORIC ACID; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PRIME & BOND NT; RESIN; SINGLE BOND; WATER;

ADULT; AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLOR; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACETONE; ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADULT; AIR; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLOR; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ETHANOL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WATER;

EID: 0035753370     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Browning WD, Brackett WW, Gilpatrick RO. Two-year clinical comparison of a microfilled and a hybrid resin-based composite in noncarious Class V lesions. Oper Dent 2000;25:46-50.
2. Buonocore M, Wileman W, Brudevold F. A report on a resin composition capable of bonding to human dentin surfaces. J Dent Res 1956;35:846-851.
3. Carvalho RM, Yoshiyama M, Pashley EL, Pashley DH. In vitro study on the dimensional changes of dentine after demineralization. Arch Oral Biol 1996;41:369-377.
4. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment. Revised American Dental Association acceptance program guidelines for dentin and enamel adhesive materials. January 1994.
5. Duke ES. Clinical studies of adhesive systems. Oper Dent Suppl 1991;5:103-110.
6. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Polymeric adhesion to dentin: Contrasting substrates. Am J Dent 1990;3:264-270.
7. Duke ES, Lindemuth J. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 1991;4:241-246.
8. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Clinical evaluation of a one-bottle bonding system for desensitizing exposed roots. Am J Dent 1999;12:243-249.
9. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-330.
10. Gwinnett AJ, Jendresen MD. Micromorphologic features of cervical erosion after acid conditioning and its relation with composite resin. J Dent Res 1978;57:543-549.
11. Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR, Pang KM, Wei SHY. Quantitative contribution of the collagen network in dentin hybridization. Am J Dent 1996;9:140-144.
12. Jacobsen T, Söderholm K-J. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995;11:132-136.
13. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992;5:213-215.
14. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992;23:39-41.
15. Kanca J. One step bond strength to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997;10:5-8.
16. Latta MA, Cavel WT, Blankenau RJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW. Clinical evaluation of the Prime & Bond 2.1 adhesive system [abstract 2582]. J Dent Res 1998;77:954.
17. Lee SJ, Walton RE, Osborne JW. Pulp response to bases and cavity depths. Am J Dent 1992;5:64-68.
18. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, Preston CD, Russel CM, Pashley DH. The effect of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 1996;75:1851-1858.
19. Marshall Jr. GW, Chang YJ, Saeki K, Gansky SA, Marshall SJ. Citric acid etching of cervical sclerotic dentin lesions: An AFM study. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;49:338-344.
20. McCoy RB, Anderson MH, Lepe X, Johnson GH. Clinical success of Class V composite resin restorations without mechanical retention. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129:593-599.
21. Mendis BRRN, Darling AI. A scanning electron microscope and microradiographic study of closure of human coronal dentinal tubules related to occlusal attrition and caries. Arch Oral Biol 1979;24:725-733.
22. Munksgaard EC, Irie M, Asmussen E. Dentin-poiymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985;64:1409-1411.
23. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982;16:265-273.
24. Pashley DH. Dentin: a dynamic substrate - a review. Scan Microsc 1989;3:161-172.
25. Paul SJ, Welter DA, Ghazi M, Pashley D. Nanoleakage at the dentin adhesive interface vs. microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 1999;24:181-188.
26. Perdigão J, Frankenberger R. Effect of solvent and re-wetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int 2001;32:385-390.
27. Perdigão J, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Wefel JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994;73:44-55.
28. Perdigão J, Van Meerbeek B, Lopes M, Ambrose WW. The effect of a re-wetting agent on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1999;15:282-295.
29. Peters MC, Dennison JB, McLean ME, Stoffers K, Hamilton J. Clinical evaluation of a new adhesive system: six months results [abstract 2103]. J Dent Res 1999;78:368.
30. Peters MC, Stoffers KW, Dennison JB, McLean ME, Hamilton JC. Clinical evaluation of a new adhesive system: results after 18-months [abstract 230]. J Dent Res 2001;80:64.
31. Rosenblatt J, Devereux B, Wallace DG. Injectable collagen as a pH-sensitive hydrogel. Biomaterials 1994;15:985-995.
32. Swift EJ, May KM, Mitchell S. Clinical evaluation of Prime & Bond 2.1 for treating cervical dentin hypersensitivity. Am J Dent 2001;14:13-16.
33. Swift EJ, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, Bayne SC, May KN, Sturdevant JR, Roberson TM. Clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001;29:1-6.
34. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996;12:236-244.
35. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SH. Ultrastructure of the resindentin interface following reversible and irreversible rewetting. Am J Dent 1997;10:77-82.
36. Torney D. The retentive ability of acid-etched dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:169-172.
37. Tyas MJ. Clinical evaluation of five adhesive systems: Three-year results. Int Dent J 1996;46:10-14.
38. Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological characterization of the interface between resin and sclerotic dentine. J Dent 1994;22:141-146.
39. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992;71:1530-1540.
40. Wilder Jr. AD, Perdigão J, Heymann HO, Swift Jr. EJ, Roberson TM, Bayne SC. Six-month clinical study of an all-in-one dentin adhesive [abstract 234]. J Dent Res 2001;80:65.