Microleakage off Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 96-99

  Trushkowsky, Richard D ^a,b,c   John Gwinnett, A ^d  

^a Staten Island University Hospital ^*  (United States)

^b STATEN ISLAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c Private Practice   (United States)

^d STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; FUJI II LC CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE; SILICON DIOXIDE; VITRABOND; VITREMER; Z100 COMPOSITE RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH DISEASE;

COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; RESIN CEMENTS; RESINS, SYNTHETIC; SILICON DIOXIDE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0030155739     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Powell LV, Gordon GE, Johnson GH. Clinical comparison of Class V resin composite and glass ionomer restorations. Am J Dent 1992;5:249-252.
2. Crim GA. Microleakage of three resin placement techniques. Am J Dent 1991;4:69-72.
3. Ferrari M. Directed shrinkage technique in Class V composite restorations: In vivo microscopic evaluation and clinical procedure. Prac Perio Aesthet Dent 1993;5:29-36.
4. Feilzer AJ, DeGee AJ, Davidson CL. Curing contraction of composites and glass-ionomer cement. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:299-300.
5. Davis EL, Yu XY, Joynt RB, et al. Shear strength and microleakage of light cured glass ionomers. Am J Dent 1993;6:127-129.
6. Eliades G, Palaghias G. In vitro characterization of visible light-cured glass ionomer liners. Dent Mater 1993;9:198-203.
7. Mount GJ. Conservative restorations with dual-cure glass ionomer cements. Pract Perio and Aesthet Dent 1993;5:15-22.
8. Wu W, Cobb EN, Dermann K, et al. Detecting marginal leakage of dental composite restorations. J Biomed Mater Res 1983;17:37-43.
9. Krejci I, Kuster M, Lutz F. Influence of dentinal fluid and stress on marginal adaptation of resin composites. J Dent Res 1993;71:490-494.
10. Crim GA. Effect of aging on microleakage of restorative systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:192-194.
11. Sidhu SK. A comparative analysis of techniques of restoring cervical lesions. Quint Int 1993;24:553-559.
12. Swift FJ, LeValley BD. Microleakage of etched-dentin composite resin restorations. Quint Int 1992;23:505-508.
13. Crim GA. Marginal leakage of visible light-cured glass-ionomer restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:561-563.
14. Monteiro S Jr, Sigurjons H, Swartz ML, et al. Evaluation of materials and techniques for the restoration of erosion areas. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:334-442.
15. Munksgaard EC, Iric M, Asmussen E. Dentin-polymer bond promoted by Gluma and various resins. J Dent Res 1985;64;1409-1411.
16. Retief DH, Mandras RS, Russell CM. Shear bond strength required to prevent microleakage at the dentin restoration interface. Am J Dent 1994;7:43-46.
17. Davidson CL, Kemp-Scholte CM. Shortcomings of composite resins in Class V restorations. J Esthet Dent 1989;1:1-4.
18. Van Meerbeek B, Willens G, Celis JP, et al. Assessment by nanoindentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin-dentin bonding area. J Dent Res 1993;72:1434-1442.
19. Kemp-Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Marginal integrity related to bond strength and strain capacity of composite resin restorative systems. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:658-664.
20. Brown KB, Swartz ML, Cochran MA, et al. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: An in vitro investigation. Oper Dent 1993; 18: 17-27.
21. Mount GJ. Clinical placement of modern glass ionomer cements. Quint Int 1993;24:99-107.
22. Swill EJ, Cloe BC. Shear bond strengths of new enamel etchants. Am J Dent 1993;6:162-164.
23. Hadavi F, Hey JH, Ambrose ER, et al. The effects of etching times on enamel bond strengths between composite resin and enamel. Oper Dent 1993;118:61-65.
24. Crim GA. Effect of composite resin on the microleakage of Scotchbond and Gluma. Am J Dent 1988;1:215-216.
25. Feilzer AJ, deGee AJ, Davidson CL. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stress by hygroscopic expansion. J Dent Res 1990;69:36-39.
26. Mixon JM, Eick JD, Chappell RP, et al. Comparison of two-surface and multi-surface scoring methodologies for in vitro microleakage studies. Dent Mater 1991;7:191-196.
27. Swift Jr EJ, Pawlus MA, Vargas. Shear bond strength of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Oper Dent 1995;20:138-143.
28. Crim GA. Marginal leakage of visible light-cured glass ionomer restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:561-563.
29. Lin A, McIntyre NS, Davidson RD. The studies on the adhesion of glass-ionomer cements to dentin. J Dent Res 1992;71:1836-1841.
30. Montari G, Biagini G, Fava F, et al. Effects of dentin surface treatments on the shear bond strength of Vitrabond. Dent Mater 1992;8:21-26.
31. Charlton DG, Haveman CW. Effect of dentin treatment on adhesion to glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1993:72:22 (Abstr 950).
32. Charlton DG, Havemen CW. Dentin surface treatment and bond strength of glass ionomer. Am J Dent 1994;7:47-49.
33. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, et al. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992;7:1530-1540.
34. Tam LE, Dev S, Pillar RM. Fracture toughness of conventional or photopolymerized glass ionomer/dentin interfaces. Oper Dent 1995;20:140-150.