The emergence of the silent witness: The legal and medical reception of X-rays in the USA

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 469-499

  Golan, Tal ^a,b  

^a BEN GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Defensive medicine; Expert testimony; Professionalization of radiology; Science and law; Scientific evidence; Visual evidence

Indexed keywords

EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HISTORY; JURISPRUDENCE; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; X RAY;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; HISTORY, 19TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; JURISPRUDENCE; UNITED STATES; X-RAYS;

EID: 7044222498     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306312704045705     Document Type: Review

References (125)

1. Albers-Schoenberg, H. (1914) 'The Roentgenologist is a Medical Specialist, and All Roentgen Plates, Prints, Tracing, and other Documents are his Sole Property', Archives of the Roentgen Ray 19: 94-97.
2. Anderson, John H. (1929) 'The Admissibility of Photographs as Evidence', North Carolina Law Review 7: 443-49.
3. Angell, Marcia (1996) Science on Trial: The Clash of Medical Evidence and the Law in the Breast Implant Case (New York: Norton).
4. Anonymous (1870) 'Expert Testimony', American Law Journal 5: 227-46, 428-42.
5. Anonymous (1898) 'First Radiograph in Evidence', American X-Ray Journal 2: 155.
6. Arns, Robert G. (1997) 'The High-Vacuum X-Ray Tube: Technological Change in Social Context', Technology and Culture 38: 852-90.
7. Barclay, A.E. (1949) 'The Old Order Changes', British Journal of Radiology 22: 300-08.
8. Beck, Carl (1900) 'Errors Caused by False Interpretation of the Roentgen Rays, and their Medico-Legal Aspects', Medical Record 58: 285.
9. Beck, Carl (1904) Roentgen Ray Diagnosis and Therapy (New York: Appleton).
10. Brain, Robert D. & Daniel J. Broderick (1992) 'The Derivative Relevance of Demonstrative Evidence: Charting its Proper Evidentiary Status', University of California at Davis Law Review 25: 957-1012
11. Brecher, Ruth & Edward M. Brecher (1969) The Rays: A History of Radiology in the United States and Canada (Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins).
12. Carman, R. (1910-1911) 'Medical Roentgenology as a Specialty', Proceedings of the Missouri State Medical Association 7: 122.
13. Cattell, H.W. (1896) 'Roentgen's Discovery - Its Application in Medicine', Medical News 68: 169-70.
14. Chesebro, Kenneth J. (1993) 'Galileo's Retort: Peter Huber's Junk Scholarship', American University Law Review 42: 1637-726.
15. Cole, Simon (1998) 'Witnessing Identification: Latent Fingerprinting, Evidence and Expert Knowledge', Social Studies of Science 28(5/6): 713-40.
16. Cole, Simon (1999) 'What Counts as Identity? The Historical Origins and Methodology of Latent Fingerprinting Identification', Science in Context 12: 139-72.
17. Collins, Vincent P. (1964) 'Origins of Medico-legal and Forensic Roentgenology', in A. Bruwer (ed.), Classic Descriptions in Diagnostic Roentgenology, vol. 2 (Springfield, IL: Thomas): 1578-1604.
18. Daemmrich, Arthur (1998) 'The Evidence Does not Speak for Itself: Expert Witnesses and the Organization of DNA - Typing Companies', Social Studies of Science 28(5/6): 741-72.
19. Daston, Lorraine & Peter Galison (1992) 'The Image of Objectivity', Representations 40: 81-128.
20. De Ville, Kenneth A. (1990) Medical Malpractice in Nineteenth-Century America: Origins and Legacy (New York: New York University Press).
21. Dooley, Dennis A. (ed.) (1942) Index to State Bar Association Reports and Proceedings (New York: Voorhis).
22. Dumit, Joseph (1999) 'Objective Brains, Prejudicial Images', Science in Context 12: 173-202.
23. Editorial (1872) 'Science in the Courts', Scientific American 26: 167.
24. Editorial (1874) Boston Medical and Surgical Journal (16 April).
25. Editorial (1894) 'Photographs as Evidence', Minnesota Law Review 2: 91-96.
26. Editorial (1896a) 'Smith v. Grant, Shadowgraphs as Evidence', Chicago Legal News 29: 145.
27. Editorial (1896b) 'A New Kind of Light', Journal of the American Medical Association (15 February); reprinted in Radiology 45 (1945): 436.
28. Editorial (1896b) 'A New Kind of Light', Journal of the American Medical Association (15 February); reprinted in Radiology 45 (1945): 436.
29. Editorial (1896c) 'Discussing the X-Ray: Judge Lefevre's Decision is Said to be Far Reaching', Rocky Mountain Daily News (9 December): 8.
30. Editorial (1897a) 'How Shall Physicians Protect Themselves?', Colorado Medical Journal 3: 34-35.
31. Editorial (1897b) 'Indemnity Bond for Plaintiffs in Damage Suits', Colorado Medical Journal 3: 35-36, 115, 122.
32. Editorial (1900) 'Report of the Committee of the American Surgical Association on the Medico-Legal Relations of the X-Rays', American Journal of the Medical Sciences 120: 7-36.
33. Edmond, Gary & David Mercer (1996) 'Manifest Destiny: Law and Science in America', Metascience 10: 40-58.
34. Edmond, Gary & David Mercer (1998) 'Trashing "Junk Science"', Stanford Technology Law Review 3. «http://stlr.stanford. edu/STLR/Articles/98_STLR_3/index.htm».
35. Edmond, Gary & David Mercer (1999) 'Juggling Science: From Polemic to Pastiche', Social Epistemology 13: 215-33.
36. Edmond, Gary & David Mercer (2000) 'Litigation Life: Law-Science Knowledge Construction in (Bendectin) Mass-Toxic Tort Litigation', Social Studies of Science 30(2): 265-316.
37. Eindlich, Gustav (1896) Expert Testimony: What Is to be Done with It? (Philadelphia, PA).
38. Eindlich, Gustav (1898) 'Proposed Changes in the Law of Expert Testimony', Pennsylvania Bar, Proceedings 189-221.
39. Eliot, Ellsworth (1916) 'The Legal Responsibility to the Surgeon and Practitioner Which the Use of the X-Ray Involves', Annals of Surgery (Philadelphia) 3: 483.
40. Fairbrother, H.C. (1902) 'Legal Railway Surgery', Railway Surgeon 8: 254.
41. Farber, Daniel A. (1997) Beyond All Reason: The Radical Assault on Truth in American Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
42. Foster, Kenneth R. & Peter W. Huber (1997) Judging Science: Scientific Knowledge and the Federal Courts (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
43. Foster, Kenneth R., David E. Bernstein & Peter Huber (eds) (1993) Phantom Risk: Scientific Inference and the Law (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
44. Foster, William (1897-1898) 'Expert Testimony - Prevalent Complaints and Proposed Remedies', Harvard Law Review 11: 169-86.
45. Friedman, Lee (1910) 'Expert Testimony: Its Abuse and Reformation', Yale Law Journal 29: 247-57.
46. Fuchs, Arthur W. (1956) 'Evolution of Roentgen Film', American Journal of Radiology 75: 30-47.
47. Gardner, Dillard S. (1946) 'The Camera Goes to Court', North Carolina Law Review 24: 244.
48. Glasser, Otto (1933) Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen and the Early History of the Röentgen Rays (London: Bale).
49. Golan, Tal (1998) 'The Authority of Shadows: The Legal Embrace of the X-Ray', Historical Reflections 22: 437-58.
50. Golan, Tal (1999) 'The History of Scientific Expert Testimony in the English Courtroom', Science in Context 12: 7-32.
51. Golan, Tal (2000) 'Blood will Out: Distinguishing Humans from Animals and Scientists from Charlatans in the Nineteenth-Century Courtroom', Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 31: 93-124.
52. Goodrich, William W. (1903) 'The Legal Status of the X-Ray', Brooklyn Medical Journal 17: 515-17.
53. Goodspeed, Arthur W. (1896) 'Roentgen's Discovery', Medical News 68: 169.
54. Goodwin, Charles (1994) 'Professional Vision', American Anthropologist 96: 606-33.
55. Goodwin, Charles (1995) 'Seeing in Depth', Social Studies of Science 25(2): 237-74.
56. Grant, William W. (1901) 'Elbow Fractures and the X-Ray', Journal of the American Medical Association 36: 777-80.
57. Halperin, Edward C. (1988) 'X-Rays at the Bar, 1896-1910', Investigative Radiology, 23: 639-46.
58. Hand, Learned (1901) 'Historical and Practical Considerations Regarding Expert Testimony', Harvard Law Review 15: 40-58.
59. Haskell, Thomas L. (1984) 'Professionalism versus Capitalism: R.H. Tawney, Emile Durkheim, and C.S. Peirce on the Disinterestedness of Professional Communities', in Thomas L. Haskell (ed.), The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press): 180-225.
60. Herschel, Clemens (1886) On the Best Manner of Making Use of the Services of Experts in the Conduct of Judicial Inquiries (Boston, MA: Mudge & Son).
61. Himes, Charles F. (1893) 'The Scientific Expert in Forensic Procedure', Journal of the Franklin Institute 85: 407-36.
62. Hodges, Paul C. (1945) 'Development of Diagnostic X-Ray Apparatus During the First Fifty Years', Radiology 45: 438-48.
63. Holland, C. Thurstan (1964) 'X-Rays in 1896', in André J. Bruwer (ed.), Classic Descriptions in Diagnostic Roentgenology (Springfield, IL: Thomas): 70-84.
64. Howell, Joel D. (1995) Technology in the Hospital: Transforming the Patient Care in the Early Twentieth Century (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
65. Huber, Peter W. (1991) Galileo's Revenge: Junk Science in the Courtroom (New York: Basic Books).
66. Jasanoff, Sheila (1995) Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
67. Jasanoff, Sheila (1998) 'The Eye of Everyman: Witnessing DNA in the Simpson Trial', Social Studies of Science 28(5/6): 713-40.
68. Kassabian, Mihran (1901) 'The Roentgen Rays in Forensic Medicine', Medico-Legal Journal 1: 407-17.
69. Kassabian, Mihran (1904) 'The Value of the Roentgen Rays in the Diagnosis of Fractures', Archives of the Roentgen Ray 9: 142-46.
70. Kenner, Sumner (1905) 'Photographs as Evidence', Central Law Journal 60: 406-10.
71. Kidd, A.M. (1914) 'The Proposed Expert Evidence Bill', California Law Review 3: 216-26.
72. Kinne, L. G. (1896) 'Expert Testimony - Its Origin, Value, Dangers and Proper Place in Jurisprudence', American Lawyer 201-04.
73. Knight, Nancy (1986) 'The "New Light": X-Rays and Medical Futurism', in Joseph J. Corn (ed.), Imagining Tomorrow: History, Technology and the American Future (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press): 10-34.
74. Kohlstedt, Sally G. (1976) The Formation of the American Scientific Community: The American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1848-1860 (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press).
75. Krause, Paul (1909) 'Zur Kenntnis der Röntgenologie in den Vereinigten Staaten von Nord Amerika', Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Röntgenstrahlen 13: 326-33.
76. Lange, Sidney (1907) The Present Status of the Roentgen Ray', Lancet-Clinic 26 January: 79-83.
77. Law, G. (1896) 'Malpractice Suits', Denver Medical Times 16: 2-11.
78. Lawyer, George (1895) 'Photographs as Evidence', Central Law Journal 41: 52-56.
79. Leonard, Charles L. (1897) 'The Application of the Roentgen Rays to Medical Diagnosis', Journal of the American Medical Association 29: 1157-58.
80. Leonard, Charles L. (1901) 'What Reliance Can be Placed Upon the Image Produced by the X-Ray from a Medico-Legal Standpoint?', Proceedings of the Medical Society of New Jersey 267-77.
81. Leonard, Charles L. (1905) 'The Past, Present and Future of the Röntgen Ray', American Medicine 10: 1082-85.
82. Lerner, Barron H. (1992) 'The Perils of "X-Ray Vision": How Radiographic Images Have Historically Influenced Perception', Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 35: 382-97.
83. Lynch, Michael (1998) 'The Discursive Production of Uncertainty: The OJ Simpson "Dream Team" and the Sociology of Knowledge Machine', Social Studies of Science 28(5/6): 713-40.
84. Mack, W. (ed.) (1914-1922) Corpus Juris, 72 vols (New York: American Law Book Co.).
85. McKelvey, John J. (1944) Handbook on the Law of Evidence, 5th edn (St Paul, MN: West Pub.).
86. McNeal, James (1984) 'Silent Witness Evidence in Relation to the Illustrative Evidence Foundation', Oklahoma Law Review 37: 219-44.
87. Mnookin, Jennifer L. (1998) 'The Image of Truth: Photographic Evidence and the Power of Analogy', Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 10: 1-74.
88. Mohr, James C. (1993) Doctors and the Law: Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
89. Monell, Samuel (1902) Studies in X-Ray Diagnosis (New York: Pelton).
90. Morrison, Remick Waite (1874) 'Testimony of Experts', The Western Jurist 8: 129-35.
91. Note (1910-1911) 'Appointment of Expert Witnesses by the Court', Harvard Law Review 24: 483-84.
92. Olson, Edward V. (1980) 'Case Note: Evidence - Adoption of the "Silent Witness Theory" - Bergner v. State', Indiana Law Review 13: 1025-53.
93. Pasveer, Bernike (1989) 'Knowledge of Shadows: The Introduction of X-Ray Images in Medicine', Sociology of Health and Illness 3: 360-81.
94. Pratt, H.P. (1899) 'X-Ray Essentials - The Value of X-Ray from a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Standpoint', American X-Ray Journal 4: 546.
95. Price, Mordecai (1897) 'Remarks on Suits for Malpractice', New York Medical Journal 65: 676-78.
96. Quimby, A. Judson (1912) 'Laboratory Notes on Radiography', Post Graduate 12: 103-15, 174-89.
97. Reed, R. Harvey (1898) 'The X-Ray From a Medico-Legal Standpoint', Journal of the American Medical Association 30: 1013-19.
98. Reiser, Stanley J. (1979) Medicine and the Reign of Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
99. Röntgen, Wilhelm C. (1896) 'On a New Kind of Rays', Nature 53: 274, 337.
100. Ross, Frank W. (1898) 'The X-Ray in Forensic Medicine', Medico-Legal Journal 16: 142-50.
101. Ross, Frank W. (1899) 'The X-Ray in Forensic Medicine', American X-Ray Journal 4: 502-03.
102. Sandor, Andrew A. (1957) 'Medicine and Law: The History of Professional Liability Suits in the United States', Journal of the American Medical Association 163: 459-66.
103. Sanger, Eugene F. (1879) 'Report on Malpractice', Boston Medical and Surgical Journal 100: 46.
104. Scott, Charles (1942) Photographic Evidence: Preparation and Presentation (Kansas City, MO: Vernon Law Book Co.): section 269.
105. Scott, Orlando F. (1929) 'Röntgenograms and their Chronological Legal Recognition', Illinois Law Review 24: 674-79.
106. Shikes, R.H. (1986) Rocky Mountain Medicine: Doctors, Drugs and Disease in Early Colorado (Boulder, CO: Johnson).
107. Skinner, E.H. (1913) 'The Ownership of X-Ray Plates', Modern Hospital 1: 31.
108. Smith, Hubert W. (1941) 'Legal Responsibility for Medical Malpractice', Journal of the American Medical Association 118: 2149-59, 2670-79.
109. Stern, M.J. (1896) 'Report of Work with Roentgen Rays at the Polyclinic Hospital', Medical and Surgical Reporter (Philadelphia) 75: 676-79.
110. Stimson, Lewis A. (1899) A Practical Treatise on Fractures and Dislocations (Philadelphia, PA: Lea).
111. Stimson, Lewis A. & J. Rogers Jr (1895) Manual of Operative Surgery (New York: Lea).
112. Stover, George H. (1898) 'Medico-Legal Value of the X-Ray', Philadelphia Medical Journal: 801-02.
113. Stover, George H. (1910) 'The Professional Position of the Röntgenologist' New York Medical Journal 91: 16-17.
114. Sunderland, E. (1914) 'The Inefficiency of the American Jury', Michigan Law Review 13: 307-09.
115. Symposia (1884) 'Expert Testimony', North American Review 138: 602-17.
116. Thomas, H.O. (1886) The Principles of the Treatment of Fracture and Dislocations (London: Lewis).
117. Tighe, Janet A. (1983) A Question of Responsibility: The Development of American Forensic Psychiatry, 1838-1930. PhD Thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
118. Tracy, Edward A. (1897) 'The Fallacies of X-Ray Pictures', Journal of the American Medical Association 29: 949-51.
119. Trowbridge, J. (1896) 'The Imperiled Dignity of Science and the Law', Atlantic Monthly 491-95.
120. Washburn, Emory (1866) 'Testimony of Experts', American Law Review 1: 45-64.
121. White, J. William (1897) 'Röntgen Rays in Surgery', Transactions of the American Surgical Association 17: 70-88.
122. Wigmore, John H. (1904) A Treatise on the System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law (Boston, MA: Little, Brown).
123. Willard, Deforest (1898) 'Röntgen Ray Skiagraphy', Journal of the American Medical Association 30: 1016.
124. Wilson, Lyman P. (1922) 'The X-Ray in Court', Cornell Law Quarterly 7: 202-34, 335-51.
125. Withers, Sanford (1934) 'The Story of the First Evidence', Radiology 17: 100-01.