A laboratory training and evaluation technique for computer-aided oral implant surgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 276-283

  Widmann, Gerlig ^a   Stoffner, Rudolf ^a   Keiler, Martin ^a   Zangerl, Antoinette ^a   Widmann, Roland ^a   Puelacher, Wolfgang ^a   Bale, Reto ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Computer aided oral implant surgery; Evaluation; Laboratory training

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; NAVIGATION; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; SURGERY;

3D PLANNING; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCAN; COMPUTER-AIDED; COMPUTER-AIDED ORAL IMPLANT SURGERY; EVALUATION; LABORATORY TRAINING; ORAL IMPLANTS; SURGICAL EVALUATIONS; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; TOMOGRAPHY IMAGING;

LABORATORIES;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; ORAL SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TRAINING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

EID: 70350716571     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.258     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Zitzmann NU, Staehelin K, Walls AW, et al. Changes in oral health over a 10 year period in Switzerland. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116: 52-59.
2. Ewers R, Schicho K, Truppe M, et al. Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 329-334. (Pubitemid 38298532)
3. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Figl M, et al. Computer-enhanced stereoscopic vision in a head-mounted display for oral implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 610-616. (Pubitemid 41749848)
4. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, et al. Prospective randomized clinical comparison of two dental implant navigation systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 785-790.
5. Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Neugebauer J, et al. Comparison of static and dynamic computer-assisted guidance methods in implantology. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9: 23-35.
6. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Schicho K, et al. Computer-guided flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a new combination of two innovative techniques. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 101: 718-723.
7. Wittwer G, Adeyemo WL, Wagner A, et al. Computer-guided flapless placement and immediate loading of four conical screw-type implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 534-539.
8. Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, et al. In vitro accuracy of a novel registration and targeting technique for image guided template production. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 502-508. (Pubitemid 43961032)
9. Widmann G, Widmann R, Widmann E, et al. Use of surgical navigation systems for CT-guided template production. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 72-78.
10. Widmann G, Widmann R, Stoffner R, et al. A multipurpose navigation system based concept for surgical template production. J Oral Maxillofac Surg (in press).
11. Brief J, Edinger D, Hassfeld S, et al. Accuracy of image-guided implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 495-501.
12. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K, Cehreli MC. The use of computerized tomography for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry. J Oral Implantol 2002; 28: 29-36.
13. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. European Association for Osseointegration. EAO guidelines fo the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 566-570. (Pubitemid 41713085)
14. Bou Serhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, et al. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002; 4: 56-72.
15. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K, et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implantats. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 7: 842-852.
16. Ganz SD. Presurgical planning with CT-derived fabrication of surgical guides. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63(9): (suppl 2): 59-71. (Pubitemid 41205523)
17. Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: 1-8. (Pubitemid 40089723)
18. Eggers G, Muhling J, Marmulla R. Image-to-patient registration techniques in head surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 35: 1081-1095. (Pubitemid 44718385)
19. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery - a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 305-313.
20. Buchanan JA. Experience with virtual reality-based technology in teaching restorative dental procedures. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 1258-1265.
21. Abbey LM, Arnold P, Halunko L, et al. CASE STUDIES for Dentistry: development of a tool to author interactive, multimedia, computer-based patient simulations. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 1345-1354.
22. Rees JS, Jenkins SM, James T, et al. An initial evaluation of virtual reality simulation in teaching pre-clinical operative dentistry in a UK setting. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2007; 15: 89-92.
23. Welk A, Splieth Ch, Seyer D, et al. German dental faculty attitudes towards computer-assisted simulation systems correlated with personal and professional profiles. Eur J Dent Educ 2006; 10: 87-95.
24. Rosenberg H, Grad HA, Matear DW. The effectiveness of computer-aided, self-instructional programs in dental education: a systematic review of the literature. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 524-532.
25. Jasinevicius TR, Landers M, Nelson S, et al. An evaluation of two dental simulation systems: virtual reality versus contemporary non-computer-assisted. J Dent Educ 2004; 68: 1151-1162.
26. Norman GR, Schmidt HG. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: theory, practice and paper darts. Med Educ 2000; 34: 721-728. (Pubitemid 30692641)
27. Abbey LM. Interactive multimedia patient simulations in dental and continuing dental education. Dent Clin North Am 2002; 46: 575-587.
28. von Sternberg N, Bartsch MS, Petersik A, et al. Learning by doing virtually. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36: 386-390.
29. Pileggi R, Glickman GN. A cost-effective simulation curriculum for preclinical endodontics. Eur J Dent Educ 2004; 8: 12-17.
30. Quinn F, Keogh P, McDonald A, et al. A study comparing the effectiveness of conventional training and virtual reality simulation in the skills acquisition of junior dental students. Eur J Dent Educ 2003; 7: 164-169.
31. Saunders TR, Dejbakhsh S. Problem-based learning in undergraduate dental education: faculty development at the University of Southern California School of Dentistry. J Prosthodont 2007; 16: 394-399.
32. Parel SM, Triplett RG. Interactive imaging for implant planning, placement, and prosthesis construction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62(9): (suppl 2): 41-47.
33. Sudbrink SD. Computer-guided implant placement with immediate provisionalization: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 771-774. (Pubitemid 40745290)
34. Casap N, Tarazi E, Wexler A, et al. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flapless implant surgery and immediate loading in the edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 92-98. (Pubitemid 40353387)
35. Pinsky HM, Champleboux G, Sarment DP. Periapical surgery using CAD/CAM guidance: preclinical results. J Endod 2007; 33: 148-151.
36. Bale R, Widmann G. Navigated CT-guided interventions. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007; 16: 196-204.
37. Wierinck E, Puttemans V, Swinnen S, et al. Effect of augmented visual feedback from a virtual reality simulation system on manual dexterity training. Eur J Dent Educ 2005; 9: 10-16.