German dental faculty attitudes towards computerassisted simulation systems correlated with personal and professional profiles

European Journal of Dental Education

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 87-95

  Welk, Alexander ^a,b   Splieth, C ^a   Seyer, D ^a   Rosin, M ^a,c   Siemer, M ^a   Meyer, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GREIFSWALD   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computer assisted dental education system; Computer assisted dental simulator; Problem based learning, evidencebased medical dental education

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DENTAL EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LANGUAGE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; COMPUTER LITERACY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION, DENTAL; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FACULTY, DENTAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SIMULATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33744781047     PISSN: 13965883     EISSN: 16000579     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2006.00401.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Welk A, Splieth C, Rosin M, Kordass B, Meyer G.DentSim-a future teaching option for dentists. Int JComput Dent 2004: 7: 123-130.
2. Clancy JM, Lindquist TJ, Palik JF, Johnson LA. Acomparison of student performance in a simulation clinicand a traditional laboratory environment: three-yearresults. J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 1331-1337.
3. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educationalissues and practical implications. Med Educ 2003: 37:267-277.
4. Rosenberg H, Grad HA, Matear DW. The effectiveness ofcomputer-aided, self-instructional programs in dentaleducation: a systematic review of the literature. J DentEduc 2003: 67: 524-532.
5. Abbey LM. Interactive multimedia patient simulations indental and continuing dental education. Dent Clin NorthAm 2002: 46: 575-587.
6. Long AF, Mercer PE, Stephens CD, Grigg P. Theevaluation of three computer-assisted learning packagesfor general dental practitioners. Br Dent J 1994: 177: 410-415.
7. Coles C. How students learn: the process of learning. In:Jolly B, Rees L, eds. Medical education in the Millennium.New York: Oxford University Press, 1998: 63-82.
8. Grigg P, Stephens CD. Computer-assisted learning indentistry. A view from the UK. J Dent 1998: 26: 387-395.
9. Williams C, Aubin S, Harkin P, Cottrell D. A randomized,controlled, single-blind trial of teaching providedby a computer-based multimedia package versus lecture.Med Educ 2001: 35: 847-854.
10. Walls AW, Whatley R, Wilson NH. British Isles symposiumon the future of dental clinical skills training. J Dent1999: 27: 317-323.
11. Jedynakiewicz N. Dental students use new technology.
12. http://www.liv.ac.uk/precinct/July2001/17.html.[accessed on 9 November 2003]
13. Lamb D, Price E, Kacer K, Graves A, Landers M,Janinevicius TR. Use of the KaVo PREPassistant scannerand software. J Dent Educ 2004: 68: 198.
14. Kacer K, Graves A, Price EM, Lamb DD, Landers M,Janinevicius TR. Assessment of the KaVo PREPassistantscanner. J Dent Res 2004: 83: 3421.
15. Price EM, Janinevicius TR, Lamb D, Kacer K, Landers M.Evaluation of KaVo PREPassistant and Class I, V Preparations.J Dent Res 2004: 83: 3417.
16. Kournetas A, Jaeger B, Axmann D, Groten M, LachmannS, Weber HG-G, J. Assessing the reliability of a digitalpreparation assistant system used in dental education. JDent Educ 2004: 68: 1228-1234.
17. Wegmann U. Hohe Anforderung an zeitgemäße Ausbildung.Starget 2000: 15-17.
18. Lilley JD, ten Bruggen Cate HJ, Holloway PJ, Holt JK,Start KB. Reliability of practical tests in operative dentistry.Br Dent J 1968: 125: 194-197.
19. Jenkins SM, Dummer PM, Gilmour AS, Edmunds DH,Hicks R, Ash P. Evaluating undergraduate preclinicaloperative skill; use of a glance and grade markingsystem. J Dent 1998: 26: 679-684.
20. Mante FK, Mante LO, Smithgall F, Abu-Hanna AA,Weintraub GS, Buchanan JB. Customization of a virtualreality system for use in dental education. J Dent Educ 1999: 63: 34.
21. Rose J, Buchanan JA, Sarrett D. The DentSim system. JDent Educ 1999: 63: 421-423.
22. Stewart DL, Gluch JI, Hammrich PL, Buchanan JB.Virtual reality technology versus traditional preclinicallab: perceptions of first year dental students. J Dent Educ1999: 63: 74.
23. Neo JCL, Tan KBC, Yap AUJ, Loh PL, Thean HPY.Student evaluation of DentSimTM virtual reality preclinicalsimulation system. J Dent Res 2000: 79: 1321.
24. Welk A, Splieth C, Klinke T, Korda B, Meyer G. Dercomputergestützte Dentalsimulator in der ZahnmedizinischenAusbildung. GMS Z Med Ausbild 2000: 17.
25. Buchanan JA. Overview of three years' experience withvirtual reality based technology in dental education. JDent Educ 2001: 65: 58.
26. Buchanan JA. Use of simulation technology in dentaleducation. J Dent Educ 2001: 65: 1225-1231.
27. Urbankova A, Lichtenthal RM. DentSim virtual reality inpreclinical operative dentistry to improve psychomotorskills-a pilot study. J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 282.
28. Jasinevicius TR, Landers MA, Nelson SS. An evaluationof two simulation systems: computer assisted vs. traditionalsimulator. J Dent Educ 2002: 66: 300.
29. Buchanan, J. Experience with virtual reality based technologyin teaching restorative dental procedures. J DentEduc 2004: 68:1258-1265.
30. Buchanan RN. Problems related to the use of humansubjects in clinical evaluation/responsibility for followupcare. J Dent Educ 1991: 55: 797-801.
31. Welk A, Immenroth M, Eberspacher H, Meyer G. Mentaltraining in dental education. Eur J Dent Educ 2003: 7: 96.
32. Welk A, Rosin M, Seyer D, Splieth C, Siemer M, Meyer G.German dental faculty attitudes towards computerassistedlearning and their correlation with personaland professional profiles. Eur J Dent Educ 2005: 9: 123-130.
33. Cameron CA. The AADS strategic plan for dentalinformatics. J Dent Educ 1990: 54: 593-594.
34. Yip HK, Barnes IE. Information technology in dentaleducation. Br Dent J 1999: 187: 327-332.