Open access repositories in computer science and information technology: An evaluation

IFLA Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 243-257

  Bhat, Mohammad Hanief ^a  

^a Islamia College of Science and Commerce   (India)

Author keywords

Computer science; Evaluation; Information technology; Open Access repositories

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350645368     PISSN: 03400352     EISSN: 17452651     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0340035209346210     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allinson, J., Francois, S. and Lewis, S. (2008) SWORD: Simple Web-service Offering Repository Deposit. Ariadne, 54. Available: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue54/allinson-et-al/ Retrieved on May 14, 2008.
2. Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities. (2003) Available: http://oa.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/berlindeclaration.html Retrieved on November 19, 2008.
3. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing. (2003) Available: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm Retrieved on November 19, 2008.
4. Carr, Leslie and Brody, Tim. (2007) Size isn't everything: Sustainable repositories as evidenced by sustainable deposit profiles. D-lib Magazine, 13(7/8). Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july07/carr/07carr.html Retrieved on December 1, 2008.
5. Chan, Diana L.H., Kwok Cathenac, S.Y. and Yip, Steve K.F. (2005) Changing roles of reference librarians: the case of the HKUST institutional repository. Reference Services Review, 33(3). Available: http://repository.ust.hk/dspace/bitstream/1783.1/2039/2/p268.pdf Retrieved on November 29, 2008.
6. Chan, Leslie. (2004) Supporting and enhancing Scholarship in the digital age: the role of open-access institutional repositories. Canadian Journal of Communication, 29. 277-300. Available: http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00002590/01/Chan_CJC_IR.pdf Retrieved on November 28, 2008.
7. Chavez, R., Crane, G., Sauer, A., Babeu, A., Packel, A. and Weaver, G. (2007) Services make the repository. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2). Available: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/195/179 Retrieved on December 1, 2008.
8. Cochrane, Tom and Callan, Paula. (2007) Making a difference: implementing the eprints mandate at QUT. OCLC Systems and Services, 23(3). Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/10650750710776396 Retrieved on April 17, 2008.
9. Correia, Ana Maria Ramalho and Teixeira, Jose Carlos. (2005) Reforming scholarly publishing and knowledge communication from the advent of the scholarly journal to the challenges of open access. Online Information Review, 29(4). Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/2640290402.html Retrieved on November 28, 2008.
10. Dobratz, Susanne, Schoger, Astrid and Strathmann, Stefan. (2007) The nestor catalogue of criteria for trusted digital repository evaluation and certification. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2). Available: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/199/180 Retrieved on November 22, 2008.
11. Fernandez, Leila. (2006) Open access initiatives in India - an evaluation. Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research, 1(1). Available: http://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/perj/article/view/110/172 Retrieved on November 22, 2008.
12. Fuhr, N., Hansen, P., Mabe, M., Micsik, A. and Solvberg, I. (2001) Digital libraries: a generic classification and evaluation scheme. Available: http://www.sics.se/~preben/papers/ecdl-2001.pdf Retrieved on November 22, 2008.
13. Genoni, Paul. (2004) Content in institutional repositories: a collection management issue. Library Management, 25(6/7). Available: http://espace.lis.curtin.edu.au/archive/00000908/02/Library_Management_04.pdf Retrieved on November 28, 2008.
14. Harnad, S. et al.(2004) The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4). Available: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10209/1/impact.html Retrieved on November 26, 2008.
15. Hughes, Carol Ann. (2004) Escholarship at the University of California: a case study in sustainable innovation for open access. New Library World, 105(3/4). Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/03074800410526749 Retrieved on April 19, 2008.
16. Kim, Hyun-Hee. (2006) Building the management model for national consortium of institutional repositories. Available: http://ohmyvocabulary.com/ifla/HyunheeKim.doc Retrieved on December 8, 2008.
17. Lynch, Clifford A. (2003) Institutional repositones: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL, 226. Available: http://dspace.uniroma2.it/dspace/bitstream/2108/261/1/ir.html Retrieved on December 4, 2008.
18. Mark, Timothy. and Shearer, Kathleen. (2006) Institutional repositories: a review of content recruitment strategies. World Library and Information Congress: 72nd IFLA General Conference and Council, Seoul, Korea. Available: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla72/papers/155-Mark_Shearer-en.pdf Retrieved on November 26, 2008.
19. McCulloch, Emma. (2006) Taking stock of open access: Progress and issues. Library Review, 55(6). Available: http://eprints.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/2325/01/Mcculloch_openaccessELIS.pdf Retrieved on November 29, 2008.
20. Muir, Adrienne. (2003) Copyright and licensing issues for digital preservation and possible solutions. Available: http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/0315.content.pdf Retrieved on December 4, 2008.
21. OpenDOAR; Directory of Open Access Repositories. (2008) Introduction to the project. Available: http://www.opendoar.org/about.html Retrieved on December 7, 2008.
22. Open Society Institute. (2002) Budapest Open Access Initiative. Available: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read.shtml Retrieved on May 23, 2008.
23. Prosser, David C. (2004) The next information revolution - how open access repositories and journals will transform scholarly communications. Liber Quarterly: The Journal of European Research, 14(1-4). Available: http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/liber/lq-1-04/prosser.pdf Retrieved on November 28, 2008.
24. Rieger, Ova Y. (2007) Select for success: key principles in assessing repository models. D-lib Magazine, 13(7/8). Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july07/rieger/07rieger.html Retrieved on December 2, 2008.
25. Sale, Arthur. (2006) Comparison of IR content policies in Australia. First Monday, 11(4). Available: http://eprints.utas.edu.au/230/1/Comparison_of_content_policies_in_Australia.pdf Retrieved on December 8, 2008.
26. Sandusky, Robert J. (n.d.) Digital library attributes: framing usability research. Available: http://www.uclic.ucl.ac.uk/annb/docs/Sandusky35.pdf Retrieved on May 25, 2008.
27. Saracevic, Tefko. (2004) Evaluation of digital libraries: an overview. Available: http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~tefko/DL_evaluation_Delos.pdf Retrieved on May 22, 2008.
28. Saracevic, Tefko. and Covi, Lisa. (2000) Challenges for digital library evaluation. Proceedings of the 63rd ASIS Annual Meeting, 37. Available: http://www.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de/courses/dl_ss04/folien/saracevic00.pdf Retrieved on May 23, 2008.
29. Shin, Eun-Ja. (2006) Implementing a collaborative digital repository: the d collection experience in South Korea. Interlending and Document Supply, 34(4). Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/02641610610714722 Retrieved on May 23, 2008.
30. Singh, J. (2005) Open access: to be or not to be? (editorial). Indian Journal of Pharmacology, 37(3). Available: http://find.galegroup.com/itx/start.do?prodId=ITOFanduserGroupName=bcdelhi Retrieved on May 20, 2008.
31. Smid, Mateja. (2006) Evaluation of digital repositories from an end-users perspective: the case of the reUSE project. Proceedings ELPUB 2006 Conference in Electronic Publishing, Bansko, Bulgaria. Available: http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/282_elpub2006.content.pdf Retrieved on November 21, 2008.
32. Thibodeau, Kenneth. (2007) If you build it, will it fly? Criteria for success in a digital repository. Journal of Digital Information, 8(2). Available: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/197/174 Retrieved on December 1, 2008.
33. Thomas, Chuck and McDonald, Robert H. (2007) Measuring and comparing participation patterns in digital repositories: repositories by the numbers, part 1. D-lib Magazine, 13(9/10). Available: http://dlib.org/dlib/september07/mcdonald/09mcdonald.html Retrieved on November 29, 2008.
34. Warwick, C., Terras, M., Galina, I., Huntington, P. and Pappa, N. (2007) Evaluating digital humanities resources: the LAIRAH project check list and the Internet Shakespeare Editions project. Proceedings ELPUB 2007 Conference on Electronic Publishing, Vienna, Austria. Available: http://elpub.scix.net/data/works/att/144_elpub2007.content.pdf Retrieved on November 21, 2008.
35. Ylotis, Kristin. (2005) The open access initiative: a new paradigm for scholarly communications. Information Technology and Libraries, 24(4). Available: http://find.galegroup.com/itx/start.do?prodId=ITOFanduserGroupName=bcdelhi Retrieved on May 22, 2008.
36. Zhang Sha, Li. (2007) The flavors of open access. OCLC Systems and Services, 23(3). Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/10.1108/10650750710776332 Retrieved on April 17, 2008.
37. Zuccala, A. and Oppenheim, C. (2008) Managing and evaluating digital repositories. Information Research, 13(1). Available: http://informationr.net/ir/13-1/paper333.html Retrieved on April 7, 2008.