Managing and evaluating digital repositories

Information Research

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Zuccala, Alesia ^a   Oppenheim, Charles ^b   Dhiensa, Rajveen ^b  

^a Rathenau Institute KNAW   (Netherlands)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45349101517     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13681613     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Andrew, T. (2006, March 31). Concern of longevity and lack of active engagement from researchers with institutional repositories [Msg 347]. Message posted to JISC-REPOSITORIES electronic mailing list, archived at http://tinyurl.com/33qc58
2. Ashworth, S., Mackie, M. & Nixon, W. J. (2004). The DAEDALUS project, developing institutional repositories at Glasgow University: the story so far. Library Review, 53(5), 259-264.
3. Bailey, C.W. (2006). What is open access? In N. Jacobs (Ed.), Open access: key strategic, technical and economic aspects (pp. 13-26). Oxford: Chandos Publishing.
4. Beaulieu, A. (2005). Sociable hyperlinks: an ethnographic approach to connectivity. In C. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. (pp. 183-197). New York, NY: Berg.
5. Bell, S., Foster, N. F. & Gibbons, S. (2005). Reference librarians and the success of institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 283-290.
6. Brody, T. & Harnad, S. (2004). Comparing the impact of open access (OA) vs. non-OA articles in the same journals. D-Lib Magazine, 10(6). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june04/ harnad/06harnad. html.
7. Brody, T., Harnad, S. & Carr, L. (2006). Earlier Web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(8), 1060-1072.
8. Buehler, M. A. & Boateng, A. (2005). The evolving impact of institutional repositories on reference librarians. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 291-300.
9. Chan, D. (2006). Core competencies and performance management in Canadian public libraries. Library Management, 27(3), 144-153.
10. Chan, D.L.H., Kwok, C.S.Y. & Yip, S.K.F. (2005). Changing roles of reference librarians: the case of the HKUST institutional repository. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 268-282.
11. Choi, Y. & Rasmussen, E. (2006). What do digital librarians do? In Marchionini, G., Nelson, M.L. & Marshall, C. C. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, Chapel Hill, N.C., USA. (pp. 187-188). New York, NY: ACM Press.
12. Cockburn, A. (2001). Writing effective use cases. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. Crow, R. (2002). The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper. Washington, DC: The Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.arl.org/sparc/ bm~doc/ir_final_release_102.pdf
14. Day, M. (2003). Prospects for institutional e-print repositories in the United Kingdom. EPrints UK supporting study, no.1.. Retrieved 16 November, 2007 from http://eprints-uk.rdn.ac.uk/project/docs/studies/impact/.
15. Dhiensa, R. (2006). Managers' perceptions of their institutional repositories. Unpublished master's dissertation, University of Loughborough, Loughborough, UK.
16. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C. & Probets, S. (2003a). RoMEO studies 1: the impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation, 53(3), 243-277.
17. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C. & Probets, S. (2003b). RoMEO studies 2: How academics want to protect their open-access research papers. Journal of Information Science, 29(5), 333-356.
18. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C. & Probets, S. (2003c). RoMEO studies 4: an analysis of journal publishers' copyright agreements. Learned Publishing, 16(4), 293-308.
19. Genoni, P. (2004). Content in institutional repositories. Library Management, 25(6-7), 300-306.
20. Gibbons, S. (2004). Defining an institutional repository. Library Technology Reports, 40(4), 6-10.
21. Gladney, H. M. (1999). Digital dilemma: intellectual property synopsis and views on the study by the National Academies' Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure. D-Lib Magazine., 5(22) Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december99/12gladney.html.
22. Guy, M., Powell, A. & Day, M. (2004). Improving the quality of metadata in e-print archives. Ariadne, (no. 38). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue38/guy/.
23. Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. and Gingras, Y. (2005). Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47. Retrieved 16 November, 2007 from http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/12906/
24. Harnad, S. (2003). Open access to peer-reviewed research through author/institution self-archiving: maximising research impact by maximising online access. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 49(4), 337-342. Retrieved 20 November, 2007 from http://tinyurl.com/3yrhky
25. Harnad, S. (2006a, January 19). Learning from the successful OA IRs. [Msg 838]. Message posted to AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM archived at http://tinyurl.com/34xgnb.
26. Harnad, S. (2006b). Publish or perish? Self-archive to flourish: the green route to open access. ERCIM News Online Edition (no. 64). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.ercim.org/publication/Ercim_News/enw64/ harnad.html.
27. Hastings, K., & Tennant, R. (1996). How to build a digital librarian. D-Lib Magazine, 2. Retrieved May 7 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/ dlib/november96/ucb/11hastings.html
28. Heery, R. & Anderson, S. (2005). Digital repositories review. Bath, UK: UKOLN and Arts and Humanities Data Service. Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/digital-repositoriesreview- 2005.pdf.
29. Hey, J. (2004, July). Targeting academic research with Southampton's institutional repository. Ariadne, 40. Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue40/hey/.
30. Jacobs, N. (Ed.) (2006). Open access: key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Oxford: Chandos Press.
31. Jenkins, B. & Breakstone, E. (2005). Content in, content out: the dual roles of the reference librarian in institutional repositories. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 312-324.
32. Johnson, R. K. (2002). Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8(11). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/ 11johnson.html.
33. Joint Information Systems Committee. (2005). Digital repositories programme 2005-7. London: Joint Information Systems Committee. Retrieved May 7, 2007 from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/ programme_digital_repositories.aspx
34. Jones, R. Andrew, T. & MacColl, J. (2006). The institutional repository. Oxford: Chandos Press.
35. Kennan, M. A. & Wilson, C. S. (2006). Institutional repositories: review and an information systems perspective. Library Management, 27(4/5), 236-248.
36. Kling, R. (1999). What is social informatics and why does it matter? D-Lib Magazine, 5(1). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january99/kling/01kling.html.
37. Koehler, A.E.C. (2006). Some thoughts on the meaning of open access for university library technical services. Serials Review, 32(1), 17-21.
38. Kurtz, M.J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C.S., Demleitner, M. & Murray, S.S. (2004). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1395-1402.
39. Lynch, C. (2003). Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(2), 327-336.
40. McLean, N. & Lynch, C. (2004). Interoperability between library and information services and learning environments - bridging the gaps. A joint white paper on behalf of the IMS Global Learning Consortium and the Coalition for Networked Information. Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.imsglobal.org/digitalrepositories/CNIandIMS_2004.pdf.
41. Medeiros, N. (2003). E-prints, institutional archives and metadata: disseminating scholarly literature to the masses. OCLC Systems & Services, 19(2), 51-53.
42. Mezick, E.M. & Koenig, M.E.D. (2008). Education for information science. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 42, 593-624
43. Moed, H. (2006). The effect of "Open Access" upon citation impact: an analysis of ArXiv's Condensed Matter section [ArXiv preprint v. 1. November 16 2006]. Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://arxiv.org/abs/cs. DL/0611060.
44. Mullins, J. & Linehan, M. (2005). The central role of leaders in public libraries. Library Management, 26(6/7), 386-396.
45. Payette, S. & Lagoze, C. (1998). Flexible and Extensible Digital Object and Repository Architecture (FEDORA). In C. Nikolaou & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference (pp. 41-60). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Vol. 1513/1998.)
46. Perry, C. A. (2005). Education for digitization: how do we prepare? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 31(6), 523-53.
47. Phillips, H., Carr, R. & Teal, J. (2005). Leading roles for reference librarians in institutional repositories. One library's experience. Reference Services Review, 33(3), 301-311.
48. Pinfield, S. (2003). Open archives and UK institutions. An overview. D-LibMagazine, 9(3) Available at http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march03/ pinfield/03pinfield.html.
49. Pinfield, S., Gardener, M. & MacColl, J. (2002). Setting up an institutional e-print archive. Ariadne, (no. 31). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue31/eprint-archives/.
50. Ray, M.S. (2001). Shifting sands: the jurisdiction of librarians in scholarly communication. Paper delivered at ACRL's 10th National Conference: Crossing the Divide. March 15-18, 2001, Denver, Colorado. Retrieved 12 October 2006 from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlevents/mray.pdf.
51. Rogers, S. A. (2003). Developing an institutional knowledge bank at Ohio State University: from concept to action plan. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 125-136.
52. Rosen, E. (2000). The anatomy of buzz. London: Harper Collins Business.
53. Sargeant, S.J.E. & Harrison, J. (2004). Clinical librarianship in the UK: temporary trend or permanent profession? Part I: a review of the role of the clinical librarian. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 21(3), 173-181.
54. Smith, M., Barton, M.R., Branschofsky, M., McClellan, G., Harford Walker, J, Bass, M. J. et al. (2003). DSpace: an open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine, 9(1). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01smith.html.
55. Spink, A. & Cool, C. (1999). Education for digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 5(5). Retrieved 15 November, 2007 from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may99/05spink.html.
56. Thelwall, M. (2004). Link analysis: an information science approach. San Diego, CA: Academic Press