Evaluating digital humanities resources: The LAIRAH project checklist and the internet Shakespeare editions project

Openness in Digital Publishing: Awareness, Discovery and Access - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Electronic Publishing, ELPUB 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 297-306

  Warwick, Claire ^a   Terras, Melissa ^a   Galina, Isabel ^a   Huntington, Paul ^a   Pappa, Nikoleta ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digital humanities; Good practice resource construction; User studies

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION; CRITICAL MASS; DIGITAL HUMANITIES; DIGITAL METHODS; DIGITAL RESOURCES; GOOD PRACTICES; HUMANITIES SCHOLARSHIP; INTERNET RESOURCES; LOG ANALYSIS; LONG-TERM SUSTAINABILITY; PROJECT CHECKLIST; PROJECT DESIGNS; PROJECT-BASED; RESEARCH OBJECTIVES; SHAKESPEARE; TECHNICAL SUPPORT; USER STUDY; USER TESTING;

ARTS COMPUTING; ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING; MAINTENANCE; RESEARCH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; WORLD WIDE WEB;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 84869001841     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. BARRETT, A. The information seeking habits of graduate student researchers in the humanities. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 2005, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 324-331.
2. TALJA, S.; MAULA, H. Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases - A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines. Journal of Documentation. 2003, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 673-691.
3. HERMAN, E. End-users in academia: meeting the information needs of university researchers in an electronic age Part 2 Innovative information-accessing opportunities and the researcher: user acceptance of IT-based information resources in academia. Aslib Proceedings. 2001, vol. 53, no. 10, pp.431-457.
4. BRITISH ACADEMY. E-resources for Research in the Humanities and Social Sciences - A British Academy Policy Review. 2005. Available from Internet: http://www.britac.ac.uk/reports/eresources/report/sect3.html#part5
5. DALTON, M. S.; CHARNIGO, L. Historians and their information sources. College & Research Libraries. 2004, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 400-425.
6. WARWICK, C.; TERRAS, M.; HUNTINGTON, P.; PAPPA, N.; GALINA, I. 'If you build it will they come? The LAIRAH survey of digital resources in the arts and humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing. 2007 (forthcoming).
7. WARWICK, C.; TERRAS, M.; HUNTINGTON, P.; PAPPA, N.; GALINA, I, The LAIRAH Project:Log Analysis of Digital Resources in the Arts and Humanities. Final Report to the Arts and Humanities Research Council. Arts and Humanities Research Council. 2007 Forthcoming
8. LINDGAARD, G.; DUDEK, C.; FERNANDES, G.; BROWN, J. Attention web designers: you have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impression. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2005, vol. 25, pp. 115-126.
9. MORKES, J; NIELSEN, J., Concise, SCANNABLE, and Objective:How to Write for the Web. Useit.com, 1997. Available from Internet: http://www.useit.com/ papers/webwriting/writing.html
10. JISC. JISC Circular 03/06: JISC Capital programme. 2006. Available from Internet: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/funding-calls/2006/06/ funding-circular03-06.aspx