Taking up the challenge of evaluating research results in the field of technology enhanced learning

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5736 LNAI, Issue , 2009, Pages 22-30

  Bottino, Rosa Maria ^a   Ott, Michela ^a   Pozzi, Francesca ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Educational Innovation; Pedagogical Planning; Research Evaluation; Technology Enhanced Learning

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION; EUROPEAN PROJECT; EVALUATION MODELS; PEDAGOGICAL PLANNING; RESEARCH EVALUATION; RESEARCH RESULTS; TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING; THEORETICAL MODELS; THEORY AND PRACTICE; WEB BASED;

E-LEARNING; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; PLANNING; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY;

EDUCATION;

EID: 70350608543     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04754-1_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Latchem, C. (ed.): A content analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology 37(4), 503-511 (2006)
2. Jacobs, G.: Evaluating courseware: Some critical questions. Innovations in Education and Training International 35, 3-8 (1998)
3. Crowther, M.S., Keller, C.C., Waddoups Gregory, L.: Improving the quality and effectiveness of computer-mediated instruction through usability evaluations. British Journal of Educational Technology 35(3), 289-303 (2004)
4. Bligh, B.: Towards a compendium of learning space evaluations, http://www.lsri.nottingham.ac.uk/JELS/JELS-newsletter1-Dec08.pdf (accessed December 08, 2008)
5. Alexandropoulou, D.A., Angelis, V.A., Mavri, M.: Knowledge management and higher education: present state and future trends. Int. Journal of Knowledge and Learning 5(1), 96-106 (2009)
6. Kim, S., Brock, D.M., Orkand, A., Astion, M.L.: Design implications from a usability study of GramStain-TutorTM. British Journal of Educational Technology 32(5), 595-605 (2001)
7. Hlapanis, G., Dimitrakopoulou, A.: A course model implemented in a teacher's learning community context: issues of course assessment. Behaviour & Information Technology 26(6), 561-578 (2007)
8. Bottino, R.M., Earp, J., Olimpo, G., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., Tavella, M.: Supporting the Design of Pilot Learning Activities with the Pedagogical Plan Manager. In: Learning to live in the knowledge society. IFIP - International Federation for Information Processing - Book Series, pp. 37-44. Springer, Boston (2008)
9. Artigue, M.: Digital technologies: A window on theoretical issues in Mathematics education. In: Pitta-Pantazi, D., Philippou, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the V Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education CERME, vol. 5, pp. 68-82 (2007)
10. Bottino, R.M., Artigue, M., Noss, R.: Building European Collaboration in Technology-Enhanced Learning in Mathematics. In: Balacheff, N., et al. (eds.) Technology Enhanced Learning, pp. 73-87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
11. Bottino, R.M., Earp, J., Olimpo, G., Ott, M., Pozzi, F., Tavella, M.: Pedagogical Plans as Communication Oriented objects. Poster presented at Cal 2009 Conference, Brighton, March 23-24 (2009)
12. Johnson, R.B., Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Turner, L.A.: Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 112-133 (2007)
13. Bagozzi, R.P., Davis, F.D., Warshaw, P.R.: Development and test of a theory of technology learning and usage. Human Relations 45(7), 660-686 (1992)
14. Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319 (1989)
15. Sammour, G., Schreurs, J., Al-Zoubi, A.Y., Vanhoof, K.: The role of knowledge management and e-learning in professional development. Int. Journal of Knowledge and Learning 4(5), 465-477 (2009)