The structure of knowledge and dynamics of scholarly communication in agenda setting research, 1996-2005

Journal of Communication

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 481-513

  Tai, Zixue ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; BIBLIOGRAPHY; COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE; MASS MEDIA; NETWORK ANALYSIS;

EID: 70350576404     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01425.x     Document Type: Article

References (179)

1. Atwater T, Salwen M B, Anderson R B. Media agenda setting with environmental issues. Journalism Quarterly 1985, 62(2):393-397.
2. Baldi S. Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review 1998, 63(6):829-846.
3. Baldi S, Hargens L L. Reassessing the N-rays reference network: The role of self citations and negative citations. Scientometrics 1995, 34(2):239-253.
4. Baldi S, Hargens L L. Re-examining Price's conjectures on the structure of reference networks: Results from the special relativity, spatial diffusion modeling and role analysis literatures. Social Studies of Science 1997, 27(4):669-687.
5. Bayer A E, Smart J C, McLaughlin G W. Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield through author citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1990, 41(6):444-452.
6. Behr R L, Iyengar S. Television news, real-world cues, and changes in the public agenda. Public Opinion Quarterly 1985, 49(1):38-57.
7. Benton M, Frazier J P. The agenda setting function of the mass media at three levels of " information holding" . Communication Research 1976, 3(3):261-274.
8. Berkowitz S D. An introduction to structural analysis: a network approach to social research 1982, Toronto, Butterworths
9. Borgatti S P, Everett M G, Freeman L C. Ucinet 6 for Windows: software for network analysis 2002, Cambridge, MA, Analytic Technologies
10. Brosius H B, Kepplinger H M. The agenda-setting function of television news: Static and dynamic views. Communication Research 1990, 17(2):183-211.
11. Carroll C E, McCombs M. Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public's images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review 2003, 6(1):36-46.
12. Cawkell A E, Garfield E. Understanding science by analyzing its literature. Essays of an information scientist 1977, 543-549. In, (Ed.), (Vol. 2, pp., Philadephia, ISI Press
13. Chang T K, Tai Z. Mass communication research and the invisible college revisited: The changing landscape and emerging fronts in journalism-related studies. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2005, 82(3):672-694.
14. Chubin D E, Moitra S D. Content analysis of references: adjunct or alternative to citation counting?. Social Studies of Science 1975, 5(4):423-441.
15. Clemens E S, Powell W W, McIlwaine K, Okamoto D. Careers in print: Books, journals, and scholarly reputation. The American Journal of Sociology 1995, 101(2):433-494.
16. Cohen B C. The press and foreign policy 1963, Princeton, NJ:, Princeton University Press
17. Cozzens S E. Using the archive: Derek Price's theory of differences among the sciences. Scientometrics 1985, 7(3-6):431-441.
18. Crane D. Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities 1972, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press
19. Dearing J W, Rogers E. Agenda-setting 1996, Thousand Oaks, CA:, Sage
20. Degenne A, Frosé M. Introducing social networks 1999, Translated by A. Borges., Thousand Oaks, CA:, Sage
21. Demers D P, Craff D, Choi Y H, Pressin B M. Issue obtrusiveness and the agenda-setting effects of national network news. Communication Research 1989, 16(6):793-812.
22. Downs A. Up and down with ecology: the " issue attention cycle." . The Public Interest 1972, 28(3):38-50.
23. Eaton H J. Agenda setting with bi weekly data on content of three national media. Journalism Quarterly 1989, 66(4):942-948, 959.
24. Egghe L, Rousseau R. Co-citation, bibliometric coupling and a characterization of lattice citation networks. Scientometrics 2002, 55(2):273-287.
25. Entman R M. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 1993, 43(4):51-58.
26. Erbring L, Goldenberg E N, Miller A H. Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science 1980, 24(1):16-49.
27. Freeman L C. The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science 2004, Vancouver, Canada:, Empirical Press
28. Funkhouser G R. The issues of the sixties: An exploratory study of the dynamics of public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 1973, 37(1):62-75.
29. Funkhouser E T. The evaluative use of citation analysis for communication journals. Human Communication Research 1996, 22(4):563-574.
30. Gans H J. Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek and Time 1979, New York, Vintage Books
31. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955, 122(3159):108-111.
32. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 1972, 178(4060):471-479.
33. Garfield E. Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology and humanities 1979, New York, Wiley
34. Ghanem S. Media coverage of crime and public opinion: An exploration of the second level of agenda setting. 1996, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas, Austin
35. Ghanem S, McCombs M, Shaw DL, Weaver D. Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. Communication and democracy: exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory 1997, 3-14. In, &, (Eds.), (pp., Mahwah, Erlbaum
36. Gilbert G N. Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7(1):113-122.
37. Gleditsch N P. The most-cited articles in JPR. Journal of Peace Research 1993, 30(4):445-449.
38. Golan G, Wanta W. Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perception of candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2001, 78(2):247-259.
39. Griffith B C, Small H G, Schwartz S. The structure of the social and behavioral sciences literature. Stockholm papers in library and information science 1983, 1-53. In, (Ed.), (pp., Stockholm, Sweden, Royal Institute of Technical Libraries
40. Hanneman R A, Riddle M. Introduction to social network methods 2005, http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/, Riverside, CA, University of California, published in digital form at
41. Hardy B W, Jamieson K H. Can a poll affect perception of candidate traits?. Public Opinion Quarterly 2005, 69(5):725-743.
42. Hicks D, Potter J. Sociology of scientific knowledge: a reflexive citation analysis or science disciplines and disciplining science. Social Studies of Science 1991, 21(3):459-501.
43. Hilgartner S, Bosk C. The rise and fall of social problems: a public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology 1988, 94(1):53-78.
44. Hummon N P, Carley K M. Social networks as normal science. Social Networks 1993, 15(1):71-106.
45. Iyengar S. Is anyone responsible: how television frames political issues 1991, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
46. Iyengar S, Kinder D. News that matters: television and American opinion 1987, Chicago, University of Chicago Press
47. Iyengar S, Simon A. News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: A study of agenda-setting, priming and framing. Communication Research 1993, 29(3):365-383.
48. Iyengar S, Peters MD, Kinder D R. Experimental demonstrations of the " not so minimal" consequences of television news programs. American Political Science Review 1982, 76(4):848-858.
49. Johnson B, Oppenheim C. How socially connected are citers to those that they cite?. Journal of Documentation 2007, 63(5):609-637.
50. Klapper J T. The effects of mass communication 1960, New York, Free Press
51. Kuhn T S. The structure of scientific revolutions 1970, (2nd ed.), Enlarged., Chicago: University of Chicago Press
52. Lang G E, Lang K, Cleveland G, de Bock H. Watergate: An exploration of the agenda-building process. Mass communication review yearbook 1981, 447-468. In, &, (eds.), (Vol. 2, pp., Beverly Hills, CA, Sage
53. Lasorsa D L, Wanta W W. Effects of personal, interpersonal and media experience on issue salience. Journalism Quarterly 1990, 67(4):804-813.
54. Leydesdorff L. Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi connected graphs in journal citation reports. Journal of Documentation 2004, 60(4):371-427.
55. Leydesdorff L. Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2007, 58(9):1303-1319.
56. Lippmann W. Public opinion 1922, New York, MacMillan
57. Lopez-Escobar E, Llamas J P, McCombs M, Federico R L. Two levels of agenda setting among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections. Political Communication 1998, 15(2):225-238.
58. Lowery S A, DeFleur M L. Milestones in mass communication research: media effects 1995, (3rd ed.), White Plains, NY, Longman
59. MacRoberts M H, MacRoberts B R. Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics 1996, 36(3):435-444.
60. McCain K W. Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1986, 37(3):111-122.
61. McCombs M. Explorers and surveyors: expanding strategies for agenda-setting research. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1992, 69(4):813-824.
62. McCombs M E. New frontiers in agenda-setting effects: second-level agendas of attributes and frames. 1997, Paper presented at the AEJMC convention, Chicago
63. McCombs M. Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion 2004, Malden, MA, Polity
64. McCombs M, Bell T, Salwen M B, Stacks D W. Agenda-setting role of mass media. Integrating theory and research in communication 1996, 93-110. In, &, (Eds.), (pp., Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
65. McCombs M, Estrada G, Iyengar S, Reeves R. The news media and the pictures in our heads. Do the media govern? Politicians, voters and reporters in America 1997, 237-247. In, &, (Eds.), (pp., Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
66. McCombs M E, Shaw DL. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 1972, 36(2):167-187.
67. McCombs M E, Shaw D L. The evolution of agenda-setting research: twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication 1993, 43(2):58-67.
68. McCombs M E, Zhu J H. Capacity, diversity, and volatility of the public agenda: trends from 1954 to 1994. Public Opinion Quarterly 1995, 59(4):495-525.
69. McCombs M, Llamas J P, Lopez-Escobar E, Federico R. Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1997, 74(4):703-717.
70. McCombs M, Shaw D L, Weaver D. Communication and democracy: exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory 1997, &, (eds.), Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
71. McKuen M B, Coombs S L. More than news: media power in public affairs 1981, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage
72. McLeod J, Becker L B, Byrnes J E. Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research 1974, 1(2):131-166.
73. Merton R K. The Matthew effect in science. Science 1968, 159(3810):56-63.
74. Merton R K. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations 1973, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press
75. Moed H F. Citation analysis in research evaluation 2005, Dordrecht, Springer
76. Monge P R, Contractor N S. Theories of communication networks 2003, NewYork, Oxford University Press
77. Morris S A. Manifestation of emerging specialties in journal literature: A growth model of papers, references, exemplars, bibliographic coupling, cocitation, and clustering coefficient distribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2005, 56(12):1250-1273.
78. Norris M, Oppenheim C. Citation counts and the research assessment exercise V. Journal of Documentation 2003, 59(6):709-730.
79. Oppenheim C. The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology. Journal of Documentation 1997, 53(5):477-487.
80. Otte E, Rousseau R. Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science 2002, 28(6):441-453.
81. Paisley W, Dervin B, Voight M J. Communication in the communication sciences. Progress in communication sciences 1984, 1-43. In, (Eds.), (Vol. 5, pp., Norwood, NJ: ABLEX
82. Paisley W. Bibliometrics, scholarly communication, and communication research. Communication Research 1989, 16(5):701-717.
83. Patterson T E. Out of order 1993, New York, Vintage Books
84. Porter A L. Citation analysis: Queries and caveats. Social Studies of Science 1977, 7(2):257-267.
85. Price D J. Little science, big science 1963, New York, Columbia University Press
86. Price D J. Network of scientific papers. Science 1965, 149(3683):510-515.
87. Price D J, Nelson C E, Pollock D K. Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and non science. Communication among scientists and engineers 1970, 3-22. In, &, (Eds.), (pp., Lexington, KY, D.C. Heath
88. Reese S, Danielian L, Shoemaker P. Intermedia influence and the drug issue: Converging on cocaine. Communication campaigns about drugs 1989, 29-46. In, (ed.), (pp., Hillsdale, Erbaum
89. Rice R E, Borgman C L, Reeves B. Citation networks of communication journals, 1977-1985: Clicks and positions, citations made and citations received. Human Communication Research 1988, 15(2):256-283.
90. Roberts M, McCombs M. Agenda setting and political advertising: Origins of the news agenda. Political Communication 1994, 11(3):249-262.
91. Rogers E M. Diffusion of innovations 2003, (5th ed.), New York, Free Press
92. Rogers E M, Dearing J D, Anderson J A. Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going?. Communication yearbook 11 1988, 555-594. In, (Ed.), (pp., Newbury Park, NJ, Sage
93. Rogers E M, Kincaid D L. Communication networks: Toward a new paradigm for research 1981, New York, Free Press
94. Rogers E M, Dearing J D, Bregman D. The anatomy of agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication 1993, 43(2):68-84.
95. Scott J. Social network analysis: a handbook 2000, (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
96. Shadish W R, Tolliver D, Gray M, Gupta S K. Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social Studies of Science 1995, 25(3):477-498.
97. Shaw D, Martin S. The function of mass media agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly 1992, 69(4):902-920.
98. Small H G. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between the two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 1973, 24(3):265-269.
99. Small H G. Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science 1978, 8(3):327-340.
100. Small H G. Cocitation context analysis and the structure of paradigms. Journal of Documentation 1980, 36(3):183-196.
101. Small H. Paradigms, citations and maps of science: A personal history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2003, 54(5):394-399.
102. Small H, Crane D. Specialties and disciplines in science and social science. Scientometrics 1979, 1(5/6):445-461.
103. Smith K A. Newspaper coverage and public concern about community issues: A time-series analysis. Journalism Monographs 1987, 101:1-32.
104. Stone G C, McCombs M E. Tracing the time lag in agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly 1981, 58(1):151-155.
105. Takeshita T, Mikami S. How did mass media influence the voters' choice in the 1993 general election in Japan: A study of agenda setting. Keio Communication Review 1995, 17:27-41.
106. Tankard J W, Chang T K, Tsang K J. Citation networks as indicators of journalism research activity. Journalism Quarterly 1984, 61(1):89-96, 124.
107. Tankard J, Hendrickson L, Silberman J, Bliss K, Ghanem S. Media frames: approaches to conceptualization and measurement. 1991, Paper presented at the annual meeting of AEJMC, Boston
108. Tuire P, Erno L. Exploring invisible scientific communities: Studying networking relationships within an educational research community. A Finnish case. Higher Education 2001, 42(4):493-513.
109. Wanta W. The public and the national agenda 1997, Mahwah, NJ, Erlbaum
110. Wanta W, Hu Y W. The agenda-setting effects of international news coverage: an examination of differing news frames. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1993, 5(3):250-262.
111. Wanta W, Hu Y W. Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting processes: an examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1994, 6(3):225-240.
112. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: Methods and applications 1994, New York, Cambridge University Press
113. Weaver D H. Issue salience and public opinion: Are there consequences of agenda-setting?. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1991, 3(1):53-68.
114. Weaver D H, Shaw D, McCombs M. Political issues and voter need for orientation. The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press 1977, 107-119. In, &, (Eds.), (pp., St. Paul, MN, West
115. Weaver D H, Graber D A, McCombs M E, Eyal C H. Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images and interest 1981, New York, Praeger
116. West R, McIlwaine A. What do citation counts count for in the field of addiction? An empirical evaluation of citation counts and their link with peer ratings of quality. Addiction 2002, 97(5):501-504.
117. White H D, Griffith B C. Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 1981, 32(3):163-172.
118. White H D, McCain K W, Williams M. Bibliometrics. Annual review of information science and technology 1989, 119-186. In, (Ed.), (Vol. 24, pp., Medford, MA, Learned Information
119. White H D, Wellman B, Nazer N. Does citation reflect social structure?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 2004, 5(2):111-126.
120. Winter J P, Eyal C H. Agenda setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly 1981, 45(3):376-383.
121. Yagade A, Dozier D M. The media agenda-setting effect of concrete versus abstract issues. Journalism Quarterly 1990, 67(1):3-10.
122. Zhu J H. Issue competition and attention distraction: a zero-sum theory of agenda setting. Journalism Quarterly 1992, 69(4):825-836.
123. Zucker H G, Ruben B D. The variable nature of news media influence. Communication yearbook 2 1978, 225-245. In, (Ed.), (pp., New Brunswick, Canada, Transaction Books
124. Holbrook R A, Hill T G. Agenda-setting and priming in prime time television: Crime dramas as political cues. Political Communication 2005, 22(3):277-295.
125. Kiousis S. Compelling arguments and attitude strength: Exploring the impact of second-level agenda setting on public opinion of presidential candidate images. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 2005, 10(2):3-27.
126. Lee B, Lancendorfer K, Lee K J. Agenda-setting and the Internet: The intermedia influence of Internet bulletin boards on newspaper coverage of the 2000 general election in South Korea. Asian Journal of Communication 2005, 15(1):57-71.
127. McCombs M. A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies 2005, 6(4):543-557.
128. Sheafer T, Weimann G. Agenda building, agenda setting, priming, individual voting intentions, and the aggregate results: an analysis of four Israeli elections. Journal of Communication 2005, 55(2):347-365.
129. Soderlund G. Rethinking a curricular icon: The institutional and ideological foundations of Walter Lippmann. Communication Review 2005, 8(3):307-327.
130. Craft S, Wanta W. U.S. public concerns in the aftermath of 9/11: A test of second level agenda-setting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2004, 16(4):456-463.
131. Kiousis S. Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of New York Times issue coverage during the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election. Journal of Communication 2004, 54(1):71-87.
132. Kiousis S, McCombs M. Agenda-setting effects and attitude strength: Political figures during the 1996 Presidential Election. Communication Research 2004, 31(1):36-57.
133. Lee G H. Reconciling " cognitive priming" vs " obtrusive contingency" hypotheses. Gazette: International Journal for Communication Studies 2004, 66(2):151-166.
134. Walgrave S, De Swert K. The making of the (issues of the) Vlaams Blok. Political Communication 2004, 21(4):479-500.
135. Wanta W, Golan G, Lee C. Agenda setting and international news: Media influence on public perceptions of foreign nations. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2004, 81(2):364-377.
136. Young M. Campaign agenda formation: The news media in the Korean Congressional Election of 2000. Asian Journal of Communication 2004, 14(2):192-204.
137. Brasher H. Capitalizing on contention: Issue agendas in U.S. Senate campaigns. Political Communication 2003, 20(4):453-471.
138. Gross K, Aday S. The scary world in your living room and neighborhood: Using local broadcast news, neighborhood crime rates, and personal experience to test agenda setting and cultivation. Journal of Communication 2003, 53(3):411-426.
139. Hester J B, Gibson R. The economy and second level agenda setting: A time-series analysis of economic news and public opinion about the economy. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2003, 80(1):73-90.
140. Jochen P. Country characteristics as contingent conditions of agenda setting: The moderating influence of polarized elite opinion. Communication Research 2003, 30(6):683-712.
141. Kiousis S. Job approval and favorability: The impact of media attention to the Monica Lewinsky scandal on public opinion of President Bill Clinton. Mass Communication and Society 2003, 6(4):435-451.
142. Ku G, Kaid L L, Pfau M. The impact of Web site campaigning on traditional news media and public information processing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2003, 80(3):528-547.
143. Kwansah-Aidoo K. Events that matter: Specific incidents, media coverage, and agenda-setting in a Ghanaian context. Canadian Journal of Communication 2003, 28(1):43-66.
144. Sato H. Agenda setting for smoking control in Japan, 1945-1990: Influence of the mass media on national health policy making. Journal of Health Communication 2003, 8(1):23-40.
145. Tsfati Y. Does audience skepticism of the media matter in agenda setting?. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 2003, 47(2):157-176.
146. Yang J, Stone G. The powerful role of interpersonal communication in agenda setting. Mass Communication & Society 2003, 6(1):57-74.
147. Yioutas J, Segvic I. Revisiting the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal: The convergence of agenda setting and framing. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2003, 80(3):567-582.
148. Bardhan N R. Accounts from the field: A public relations perspective on global AIDS/HIV. Journal of Health Communication 2002, 7(3):221-244.
149. Kim S H, Scheufele D A, Shanahan J. Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2002, 79(1):7-25.
150. Pratt C B, Ha L, Pratt C A. Setting the public health agenda on major diseases in Sub-Saharan Africa: African popular magazines and medical journals, 1981-1997. Journal of Communication 2002, 52(4):889-904.
151. Roberts M, Wanta W, Dzwo T H. Agenda setting and issue salience online. Communication Research 2002, 29(4):452-465.
152. Tewksbury D. Issue attributes and agenda-setting by media, the public, and policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2002, 14(3):264-285.
153. Werder O. Debating the Euro: media agenda-setting in a cross-national environment. Gazette: International Journal for Communication Studies 2002, 64(3):219-234.
154. Berger B K. Private issues and public policy: Locating the corporate agenda in agenda-setting theory. Journal of Public Relations Research 2001, 13(2):91-126.
155. Boyle T P. Intermedia agenda setting in the 1996 presidential election. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2001, 78(1):26-44.
156. Fico F, Freedman E. Setting the news story agenda: Candidates and commentators in news coverage of a governor's race. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2001, 78(3):437-449.
157. Ghanem S I, Wanta W. Agenda-setting and Spanish cable news. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 2001, 45(2):277-289.
158. Golan G, Wanta W. Second-level agenda setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarter 2001, 78(2):247-259.
159. Kwanasah-Aidoo K. The appeal of qualitative methods to traditional agenda-setting research. Gazette: International Journal for Communication Studies 2001, 63(6):521-537.
160. Rossler P, Schenk M. Cognitive bonding and the German reunification: Agenda-setting and persuasion effects of mass media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 2000, 12(1):29-47.
161. Scheufele Dietram A. Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society 2000, 3(2/3):297-316.
162. Chan K. The media and environmental issues in Hong Kong 1983-95. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1999, 11(2):135-151.
163. Chang K K. Auto trade policy and the press: Auto elite as a source of the media agenda. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1999, 76(2):312-324.
164. Kiousis S, Bantimaroudis P, Ban H. Candidate image attributes. Communication Research 1999, 26(4):414-428.
165. Matera F R, Salwen M B. Issue salience and the third-person effect: Perceptions of illegal immigration. World Communication 1999, 28(3):11-27.
166. Okeowo D, Swain W N. Valence positioning and increased media visibility: Biafra's and Nigeria's wartime publicity activities. World Communication 1999, 28(1):43-56.
167. Roessler P. The individual agenda-designing process. Communication Research 1999, 26(6):666-700.
168. Shaw D L, McCombs M. Individuals, groups, and agenda melding: A theory of social dissonance. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1999, 11(1):2-24.
169. Dalton R J, Beck P A, Huckfeldt R, Koetzle W. A test of media-centered agenda setting: Newspaper content and public interest in a presidential election. Political Communication 1998, 15(4):463-481.
170. Jasperson A E, Shah D V, Watts M, Faber R J, Fan D P. Framing and the public agenda: Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication 1998, 15(2):205-224.
171. Lopez-Escobar E, LLamas J P, McCombs M, Lennon F R. Two levels of agenda among advertising and news in the 1995 Spanish elections. Political Communication 1998, 15(2):225-238.
172. McCombs M. New frontiers in agenda setting: Agendas of attributes and frames. Mass Communication Review 1997 1997, 24(1/2):32-42.
173. McCombs M. Building consensus: The news media's agenda-setting roles. Political Communication 1997, 14(4):433-443.
174. McCombs M, Llamas J P, Lopez-Escobar E, Rey F. Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1997, 74(4):703-717.
175. Roberts M S, Bantimaroudis P. Gatekeepers in international news. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 1997, 2(2):62-76.
176. Salwen M B, Lin C A, Splichal S. Predicting issue salience: Media influence and personal experience with crime. World Communication 1997, 26(1):1-12.
177. Brosius H B, Wiemann G. Who sets the agenda? Agenda-setting as a two-step flow. Communication Research 1996, 23(5):561-580.
178. Demers D P. Does personal experience in a community increase or decrease newspaper reading?. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 1996, 73(2):304-318.
179. Dyer S C. Descriptive modeling for public relations environmental scanning: A practitioner's perspective. Journal of Public Relations Research 1996, 8(3):137-150.