U.S. public concerns in the aftermath of 9-11: A test of second level agenda-setting

International Journal of Public Opinion Research

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 456-463

  Craft, Stephanie ^a   Wanta, Wayne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9344271116     PISSN: 09542892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edh039     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Babbie, E. (1995). The practice of social research (7th ed.). Belmont, MA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
2. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
3. Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 157-161.
4. Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda-setting. In M. McCombs, D. L. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and Democracy (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Golan, G., & Wanta, W. (2001). Second-level agenda-setting in the New Hampshire primary: A comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 247-259.
6. Kiousis, S., Bantimaroudis, P., & Ban, H. (1999). Candidate image attributes: Experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research, 26, 414-428.
7. Lewis, C. W. (2000). The terror that failed: Public opinion in the aftermath of the bombing in Oklahoma City. Public Administration Review, 60, 201-210.
8. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
9. McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 703-716.
10. Morton, T. A., & Duck, J. M. (2001). Communication and health beliefs: Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research, 28, 602-626.
11. Rhee, J. W. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing.' Journal of Communication, 47(3), 26-48.
12. Shah, D., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). 'To thine own self be true': Values, framing, and voter decision making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.
13. Tedesco, J. C. (2001). Issue and strategy agenda-setting in the 2000 presidential primaries. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(2), 2048-2067.
14. Tyler, T., & Cook, F. (1984). The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 693-708.
15. Wanta, W., & Hu, Y. (1994). Time-lag differences in the agenda-setting process: An examination of five news media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 225-240.
16. Zucker, H. G. (1978). The variable nature of news media influence. In B. D. Rubin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, Vol. 2 (pp. 225-245). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.