The individual agenda-designing process: How interpersonal communication, egocentric networks, and mass media shape the perception of political issues by individuals

Communication Research

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 666-700

  Roessler, Patrick ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002321226     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009365099026006002     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1985). The origins of individual media-system dependency: A sociological framework. Communication Research, 12, 485-510.
2. Becker, L. B. (1982). The mass media and citizen assessment of issue importance: A reflection on agenda-setting research. In D. Whitney & E. Wartella (Eds.), Mass communication yearbook (Vol. 3, pp. 521-536). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3. Blood, W. (1989). Public agendas and media agendas: Some news that may matter. Media Information Australia, 52, 7-15.
4. Brosius, H. -B. (1991). Schema-Theorie: ein brauchbarer Ansatz in der Wirkungsforschung? [Schematic information processing: A useful perspective for media effects research?] Publizistik, 3, 285-297.
5. Brosius, H. -B., & Kepplinger, H. M. (1992). Linear and nonlinear models of agenda-setting in television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 36, 5-23.
6. Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general society survey. Social Networks, 6, 293-339.
7. Byrne, B. M. (1995). One application of structural equation modeling from two perspectives: Exploring the EQS and LISREL strategies. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 138-157). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Agenda-setting (Communication Concepts 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Eaton, H., Jr. (1989). Agenda-setting with bi-weekly data on content of three national media. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 942-948, 959.
10. Ehlers, R. (1983). Themenstrukturierung durch Massenmedien? Zum Stand der empirischen Agenda-Setting-Forschung [Structuring of issues by the mass media? On the state of empirical agenda-setting research]. Publizistik, 28, 167-186.
11. Eichhorn, W. (1996). Agenda-Setting-Prozesse: Eine theoretische Analyse individueller und gesellschaftlicher Themenstrukturierung [Agenda-setting processes: A theoretical analysis of individual and social structuring of issues]. Munich, Germany: Fischer.
12. Erbring, L., Goldenberg, E. N., & Miller, A. H. (1980). Front-page news and real-world cues: A new look at agenda-setting by the media. American Journal of Political Science, 24, 16-49.
13. Eyal, C. H., Winter, J. P., & DeGeorge, W. F. (1981). The concept of time frame in agenda-setting. In G. Wilhoit & H. DeBock (Eds.), Mass communication review yearbook (Vol. 2, pp. 212-218). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
14. Fischer, C. S. (1982). To dwell among friends: Personal networks in town and city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1984). Social cognition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16. Frueh, W., & Schoenbach, K. (1982). Der dynamisch-transaktionale Ansatz: Ein neues Paradigma der Medienwirkungen [The dynamic and transactional approach: A new paradigm of media effects]. Publizistik, 27, 74-88.
17. Ghanem, S. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda-setting. In M. McCombs, D. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 3-14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Gonzenbach, W. J. (1992). A time-series analysis of the drug issue, 1985-1990: The press, the president and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 126-147.
19. Gonzenbach, W. J., & McGavin, L. (1997). A brief history of time: A methodological analysis of agenda-setting. In M. McCombs, D. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 115-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Graber, D. A. (1984). Processing the news: How people tame the information tide. New York: Longman.
21. Heise, D. R. (1970). Causal inference from panel data. In E. Borgatta (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1970 (pp. 3-27). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22. Hoyle, R. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 1-15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Hoyle, R., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Huegel, R., Degenhardt, W., & Weiß, H. -J. (1989). Structural equation models for the analysis of the agenda-setting process. European Journal of Communication, 4, 191-210.
26. Huegel, R., Degenhardt, W., & Weiß, H. -J. (1992). Strukturgleichungsmodelle fuer die Analyse des Agenda Setting-Prozesses [Structural equation models for the analysis of the agenda-setting process]. In W. Schulz (Ed.), Medienwirkungen. Forschungsbericht [Media effects. Research report] (pp. 144-159). Weinheim: VCH.
27. Hull, J. G., Tedlie, J. C., & Lehn, D. A. (1995). Modeling the relation of personality variables to symptom complaints: The unique role of negative affectivity. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 217-235). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Iyengar, S. (1988). New directions of agenda-setting research. In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 595-602). London: Sage Ltd.
29. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Joereskog, K. G., & Soerbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago: SPSS, Inc.
32. Kepplinger, H. M., & Martin, V. (1986). Die Funktion der Massenmedien in der Alltagskommunikation [The functions of mass media in everyday communication]. Publizistik, 31, 118-128.
33. Kim, J. K., Shoar-Gaffari, P., & Gustainis, J. J. (1990). Agenda-setting functions of a media event: The case of "Amerika." Political Communication and Persuasion, 7, 1-10.
34. Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Problems and opportunities in agenda-setting research. Journal of Communication, 43(2), 100-127.
35. Kraus, S., & Davis, D. (1976). The effects of mass communication on political behavior. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
36. Lasorsa, D. L. (1991). Political outspokenness: Factors working against the spiral of silence. Journalism Quarterly, 68, 131-140.
37. Lemert, J. B. (1981). Does mass communication change public opinion after all? A new approach to effects analysis. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
38. Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
39. Luhmann, N. (1996). Die Realitaet der Massenmedien [The reality of mass media] (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
40. McCombs, M. (1981). The agenda-setting approach. In D. Nimmo & K. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 121-140). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. McCombs, M., Danielian, L., & Wanta, W. (1995). Issues in the news and the public agenda: The agenda-setting tradition. In T. Glasser & C. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 281-300). New York: Guilford.
42. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
43. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1977). Agenda-setting and the political process. In D. Shaw & M. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 149-156). St. Paul, MN: West.
44. McCombs, M., & Weaver, D. H. (1985). Toward a merger of gratifications and agenda-setting research. In K. Rosengren, L. Wenner, & P. Palmgreen (Eds.), Media gratifications research (pp. 95-108). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
45. McLeod, J. M., Becker, L. B., & Byrnes, J. E. (1974). Another look at the agenda-setting function of the press. Communication Research, 1, 131-165.
46. McLeod, J. M., Kosicki, G. M., & Pan, Z. (1991). On understanding and misunderstanding media effects. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 235-266). London: Arnold.
47. McLuskie, E. (1992). The mediacentric agenda of agenda-setting research: Eclipse of the public sphere. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 15, pp. 410-424). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48. Miller, A. H., & Asp, K. (1985). Learning about politics from the media: A comparative study of Sweden and the United States. In S. Kraus & R. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (pp. 241-266). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
49. Myers, J. H., & Alpert, M. I. (1977). Semantic confusion in attitude research: Salience vs. importance vs. determinance. Advances in Consumer Research, 4, 106-110.
50. Pan, Z., & McLeod, J. M. (1991). Multilevel analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18, 140-173.
51. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1995). News values and public opinion: A process. In F. Biocca (Ed.), Television and political advertising (pp. 265-309). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
52. Protess, D. L., & McCombs, M. (Eds.). (1991). Agenda setting: Readings on media, public opinion, and policymaking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
53. Ramparasad, J. (1983). Agenda-setting: Is not a 1984 view or is a 1984 view. Gazette, 32, 119-135.
54. Roessler, P. (1997). Agenda-Setting: Theoretische Annahmen und empirische Evidenzen einer Medienwirkungshypothese [Agenda-Setting: Theoretical assumptions and empirical evidence of a media effects hypothesis]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
55. Rogers, E. M., & Dearing, J. W. (1988). Agenda-setting research: Where has it been, where is it going? In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 555-594). London: Sage Ltd.
56. Rozelle, R. M., & Campbell, D. T. (1969). More plausible rival hypotheses in the cross-lagged panel correlation technique. Psychological Bulletin, 71, 74-80.
57. Schoenbach, K. (1982). "The issues of the seventies." Computerunterstuetzte Inhaltsanalyse und die langfristige Beobachtung von Agenda-Setting-Wirkungen der Massenmedien ["The issues of the seventies." Electronic content analysis and the long range observation of agenda-setting effects of the mass media]. Publizistik, 27, 129-140.
58. Schoenbach, K., & Semetko, H. A. (1992). Agenda-setting, agenda-reforcing or agenda-deflating? A study of the 1990 German national election. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 837-846.
59. Schoenbach, K., & Weaver, D. H. (1985). Finding the unexpected: Cognitive bonding in a political campaign. In S. Kraus & R. Perloff (Eds.), Mass media and political thought: An information-processing approach (pp. 157-176). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60. Selvin, H. C. (1958). Durkheim's suicide and problems of empirical research. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 607-619.
61. Shaw, E. F. (1977). The agenda-setting hypothesis reconsidered: Interpersonal factors. Gazette, 23, 230-240.
62. Shaw, D. L., & Martin, S. E. (1992). The function of mass media agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 902-920.
63. Shaw, D. L., & McCombs, M. E. (1977). The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press. St. Paul, MN: West.
64. Stevenson, R. L., & Ahern, T. J. (1979). Individual effects of agenda-setting. Unpublished manuscript.
65. Stoolmiller, M., Duncan, T. E., & Patterson, G. R. (1995). Predictors of change in antisocial behavior during elementary school for boys. In R. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 236-253). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Tardy, C. H., Gaughan, B. J., Hemphill, M. R., & Crockett, N. (1981). Media agendas and political participation. Journalism Quarterly, 58, 624-627.
67. Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition (pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
68. Tipton, L., Haney, R. D., & Baseheart, J. R. (1975). Media agenda-setting in city and state election campaigns. Journalism Quarterly, 52, 15-22.
69. Wanta, W., & Hu, Y. -W. (1994). The effects of credibility, reliance, and exposure on media agenda-setting: A path analysis model. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 90-98.
70. Wanta, W., & Wu, Y. -C. (1992). Interpersonal communication and the agenda-setting process. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 847-855.
71. Weaver, D. H. (1977). Political issues and voter need for orientation. In D. Shaw & M. McCombs (Eds.), The emergence of American political issues: The agenda-setting function of the press (pp. 107-120). St. Paul, MN: West.
72. Weaver, D. H. (1980). Audience need for orientation and media effects. Communication Research, 7, 361-376.
73. Weaver, D. H. (1984). Media agenda-setting and public opinion: Is there a link? In R. Bostrom (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 8, pp. 680-691). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
74. Weaver, D. H., Graber, D. A., McCombs, M. E., & Eyal, C. H. (1981). Media agenda-setting in a presidential election: Issues, images, and interest. New York: Praeger.
75. Weaver, D. H., Stehle, T. E., Auh, T. S., & Wilhoit, C. G. (1975). Apath analysis of individual agenda-setting during the 1974 Indiana senatorial campaign. Paper presented to the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Annual Convention, Ottawa, Canada.
76. Weimann, G. (1994). The influentials: People who influence people. New York: State University of New York Press.
77. Weimann, G., & Brosius, H. -B. (1994). Is there a two-step-flow of agenda-setting? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 6, 23-341.
78. Wicks, R. H. (1992). Schema theory and measurement in mass communication research: Theoretical and methodological issues in news information processing. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 15, pp. 115-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
79. Williams, W., Jr., & Semlak, W. (1978). Campaign '76: Agenda-setting during the New Hampshire primary. Journal of Broadcasting, 22, 531-540.
80. Wilnat, L. (1997). Agenda-setting and priming: Conceptual links and differences. In M. McCombs, D. Shaw, & D. Weaver (Eds.), Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory (pp. 51-66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
81. Winter, J. P., & Eyal, C. H. (1991). Agenda setting for the civil rights issue. Public Opinion Quarterly, 45, 376-383.
82. Yan, J., Jiang, Y., Watt, J. H., Zhu, J. -H., & Snyder, L. (1992). A comparison of four agenda-setting models. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
83. Zhu, J. -H. (1992). Issue competition and attention distraction: A zero-sum theory of agenda-setting. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 825-836.
84. Zhu, J. -H., Watt, J. H., Snyder, L. B., Yan, J., & Jiang, Y. (1993). Public issue priority formation: Media agenda-setting and social interaction. Journal of Communication, 43(1), 8-29.