Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Dismembered Anderson-Hynes Pyeloplasty in Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction (Report of 150 cases)

Urology

Volumn 74, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1036-1040

  Chuanyu, Sun ^a   Guowei, Xia ^a   Ke, Xu ^a   Qiang, Ding ^a   Yuanfang, Zhang ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY; KIDNEY SCINTISCANNING; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOLITHOTOMY; PYELOPLASTY; RETROGRADE PYELOGRAPHY; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION; URINE INCONTINENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70350568647     PISSN: 00904295     EISSN: 15279995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.083     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kavoussi L.R., and Peters C.A. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol 150 (1993) 1891-1894
2. Turk I.A., Davis J.W., Winkelmann B., et al. Laparoscopic dismemebered pyeloplasty-the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels. Eur Urol 42 (2002) 268-275
3. Inagaki T., Rha K.H., Ong A.M., et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status. BJU Int 95 suppl 2 (2005) 102-105
4. Bauer J.J., Bishoff J.T., Moore R.G., et al. Laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty: assessment of objective and subjective outcome. J Urol 162 (1999) 692-695
5. Soulie M., Thoulouzan M., Seguin P., et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology 57 (2001) 443-447
6. Jarrett T.W., Chan D.Y., Charambura T.C., et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol 167 (2002) 1253-1256
7. Baldwin D.D., Dunbar J.A., Wells N., et al. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty. J Endourol 17 (2003) 155-160
8. Troxel S., Das S., Helfer E., et al. Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair. J Urol 176 (2006) 1073-1076
9. O'Reilly P.H., Brooman P.J., Mak S., et al. The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 87 (2001) 287-289
10. Bernado N., and Smith A.D. Endopyelotomy review. Arch Esp Urol 52 (1999) 541-548
11. Klingler H.C., Remzi M., and Janetschek G. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty: techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 44 (2003) 340-345
12. Madi R., Roberts W.W., and Wolf Jr. J.S. Late failures after laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Urology 71 (2008) 677-681
13. Zhang X., Li H.Z., Wang S.G., et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: experience with 50 cases. Urology 66 (2005) 514-517
14. Moon D.A., El-Shazly M.A., Chang C.M., et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 67 (2006) 932-936
15. Bachmann A., Ruszat R., Forster T., et al. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): solving the technical difficulties. Eur Urol 49 (2006) 264-272
16. Rassweiler J.J., Subotic S., Feist-Schwenk M., et al. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. J Urol 177 (2007) 1000-1005
17. El-Shazly M.A., Moon D.A., and Eden C.G. Reviews in endourology laparoscopic pyeloplasty: status and review of literature. J Endourol 21 (2007) 673-678
18. Shoma A.M., El Nahas A.R., and Bazeed M.A. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a prospective randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol 178 (2007) 2020-2024
19. Gettman M.T., Peschel R., and Neururer R. A comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed with the da Vinci robotic system versus standard laparoscopic techniques: initial clinical results. Eur Urol 42 (2002) 453-458
20. Yanke B.V., Lallas C.D., Pagnani C., et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: technical considerations and outcomes. J Endourol 22 (2008) 1291-1295
21. Kaouk J.H., Hafron J., and Parekattil S. Is retroperitoneal approach feasible for robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: initial experience and long-term results. J Endourol 22 (2008) 2153-2159