|
Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 443-447
|
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: Comparison of two surgical approaches
a a a a a a a
a
CHU RANGUEIL
(France)
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
ANESTHESIA;
ARTICLE;
BLEEDING;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CONVALESCENCE;
EXPERIENCE;
FEMALE;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
HYDRONEPHROSIS;
INCISION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
INTRAVENOUS UROGRAPHY;
KIDNEY DISEASE;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
OPERATION DURATION;
PATHOLOGY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
POSTOPERATIVE PAIN;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
PYELOPLASTY;
RETROPERITONEUM;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION;
URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
KIDNEY PELVIS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SUTURE TECHNIQUES;
URETER;
URETERAL OBSTRUCTION;
URETEROSCOPY;
|
EID: 0035123621
PISSN: 00904295
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)01065-7 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (91)
|
References (22)
|