False confessions: Causes, consequences, and implications

Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 332-343

  Leo, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; DELINQUENCY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DNA DETERMINATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FALSE CONFESSION; HUMAN; MALPRACTICE; MANAGEMENT; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGIC ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC PROCEDURES, TECHNIQUES AND CONCEPTS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REVIEW; COOPERATION; GUILT; LEGAL ASPECT; POLICE; RECUMBENCY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SUGGESTION;

COERCION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DECEPTION; GUILT; HUMANS; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; POLICE; PRISONERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUGGESTION;

EID: 70350492763     PISSN: 10936793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Leo R: Re-thinking the study of miscarriages of justice: developing a criminology of wrongful conviction. J Contemp Crim Just 21:201-223, 2005
2. Gross S, Jacoby K, Matheson D, et al: Exonerations in the United States, 1989 through 2003. J Crim Law Criminol 95:523-53, 2005
3. Borchard EM: Convicting the Innocent: Errors of Criminal Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1932
4. Baumgartner FR, DeBoef SL, Boydstun AE: The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007
5. Drizin S, Leo R: The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. NC L Rev 82:891-1007, 2004
6. Garrett B: Judging innocence. Colum L Rev 108:55-142, 2008
7. Leo R: Police Interrogation and American Justice. Harvard University Press, 2008
8. Leo R, Ofshe R: The consequences of false confessions: deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. J Crim Law Criminol 88:429-496, 1998 (Pubitemid 128107037)
9. Gudjonsson GH: The Psychology of Interrogations and Confessions: A Handbook. New York: Wiley, 2003
10. Leo R: Questioning the relevance of Miranda in the twenty-first century. Mich L Rev 99:1000-1029, 2001
11. Chojnacki DE, Cicchini MD, White LT: An empirical basis for the admission of expert testimony on false confessions. Ariz St L J 40:1, 2008
12. Kassin S, Gudjonsson G: The psychology of confessions: a review of the literature and issues. Psychol Sci Public Int 5:35-67, 2004
13. Zimbardo P: Coercion and compliance: the psychology of police confessions, in The Triple Revolution. Edited by Perruci C, Pilisuk M. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971, pp 492-508
14. Davis D, Leo R: Strategies for preventing false confessions and their consequences, in Practical Psychology for Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions. Edited by Kebbell M, Davies G. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2006, pp 121-149
15. Bond CF, DePaulo BM: Accuracy of deception judgments. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10:214-234, 2006
16. Hartwig M, Granhag PA, Stromwall L, et al: Police officers' lie detection accuracy: interrogating freely vs. observing video. Police Q 7:429-456, 2004
17. Kassin S, Fong CT: "I'm innocent!" Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law Hum Behav 23:499-516, 1999
18. Davis D, Follette W: Rethinking probative value of evidence: base rates, intuitive profiling and the postdiction of behavior. Law Hum Behav 26:133-158, 2002
19. Gross S: The risks of death: why erroneous convictions are common in capital cases. Buff L Rev 44:469-500, 1996
20. Ofshe R, Leo R: The social psychology of police interrogation: the theory and classification of true and false confessions. Stud Law Politics Soc 16:189-251, 1997
21. Ofshe R, Leo R: The decision to confess falsely: rational choice and irrational action. Denv U L Rev 74:979-1122, 1997
22. Blagrove M: Effects of length of sleep deprivation on interrogative suggestibility. J Exp Psychol 2:48-59, 1996
23. Harrison Y, Horne J: The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: a review. J Exp Psychol 6:236-249, 2000
24. Cloud M, Shepherd G, Barkoff A, et al: Words without meaning: the constitution, confessions and developmentally disabled suspects. U Chi L Rev 69:495-624, 2002
25. Conley R, Luckasson R, Bouthilet G: The Criminal Justice System and Mental Retardation: Defendants and Victims. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes, 1992
26. Ellis J, Luckasson R: Developmentally disabled defendants. Geo Wash L Rev 53:414-493, 1985
27. Gudjonsson G, Clare I, Rutter S, et al: Persons at risk during interviews in police custody: the identification of vulnerabilities. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study No. 12. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1993
28. Owen-Kostelnik J, Reppucci N, Meyer J: Testimony and interrogation of minors: assumptions about maturity and morality. Am Psychol 4:286-304, 2006 (Pubitemid 43815185)
29. Drizin S, Colgan B: Tales from the juvenile confession front: a guide to how standard police interrogation tactics can produce coerced and false confessions from juvenile suspects, in Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment. Edited by Lassiter GD. New York: Kluwer Academic, 2004, pp 127-162
30. Redlich A: Mental illness, police interrogations, and the potential for false confession. Law Psychiatry 55:19-21, 2004
31. Salas C: The case for excluding confessions of the mentally ill. Yale J L & Human 16:243-275, 2004
32. Leo R, Drizin S, Neufeld P, et al: Bringing reliability back: false confessions and legal safeguards in the twenty-first century. Wis L Rev 2:479-539, 2006
33. Kassin S, Wrightsman L: Confession evidence, in The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure. Edited by Kassin S, Wrightsman L. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1985, pp 67-94
34. McCann J: A conceptual framework for identifying various types of confessions. Behav Sci Law 16:441-453, 1998 (Pubitemid 29026794)
35. Wagenaar W, van Koppen P, Crombag H: Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1993
36. Radelet M, Bedau H, Putnam C: In Spite of Innocence: Erroneous Convictions in Capital Cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1992
37. Corwin M: False confessions and tips still flow in Simpson case, crime: Such calls have been common since Lindbergh kidnapping. About 500 confessed to Black Dahlia killing. Los Angeles Times, March 25, 1996, p A1.
38. See also, Voluntary false confessions: a neglected area in criminal administration. Ind L J 28:374-392, 1953
39. Leo R: The third degree and the origins of psychological police interrogation in the United States, in Interrogations, Confessions, and Entrapment. Edited by Lassiter GD. New York: Kluwer Academic, 2004, pp 37-84
40. Kassin S: The psychology of confession evidence. Am Psychol 52:221-233, 1997
41. Davis D, O'Donahue W: The road to perdition: extreme influence tactics in the interrogation room, in Handbook of Forensic Psychology. Edited by O'Donahue W. San Diego: Academic Press, 2004, pp 897-996
42. White WS: Miranda's Waning Protections: Police Interrogation Practices After Dickerson. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2001
43. Kassin S: On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk? Am Psychol 60:215-228, 2005
44. Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 182 (1986)
45. Miller GR, Boster FJ: Three images of the trial: their implications for psychological research, in Psychology in the Legal Process. Edited by Sales B. New York: Pocket Books, 1977, pp 19-38
46. Leo R: Inside the interrogation room. J Crim Law Criminol 86:266-303, 1996
47. Castelle G, Loftus E: Misinformation and wrongful convictions, in Wrongly Convicted: Perspectives on Failed Justice. Edited by Westervelt SD, Humphrey JA. Newark: Rutgers University Press, 2001, pp 17-35
48. Findley K, Scott M: The multiple dimensions of tunnel vision in criminal cases. Wis L Rev 291-398, 2006
49. Medwed D: The zeal deal: prosecutorial resistance to post-conviction claims of innocence. B U L Rev 84:125-183, 2004
50. Cassell P, Hayman B: Police interrogation in the 1990s: an empirical study of the effects of Miranda. UCLA L Rev 43:839-931, 1996
51. Walker S: Popular Justice: A History of American Criminal Justice (ed 2). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998
52. Nardulli P, Eisenstein J, Fleming R: The tenor of justice: criminal courts and the guilty plea process. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1988
53. Wald M, Ayres R, Hess DW, et al: Interrogations in New Haven: the impact of Miranda. Yale L J 76:1519-1648, 1967
54. California v. Cahill, 5 Cal.4th 497 (Cal. 1993).
55. Givelber D: Punishing protestations of innocence: denying responsibility and its consequences. Am Crim L Rev 37:1363-1408, 2000
56. Kassin S, Sukel H: Coerced confessions and the jury. Law Hum Behav 21:27-46, 1997
57. Leo R, Ofshe R: The truth about false confessions and advocacy scholarship. Crim Law Bull 37:293-370, 2001
58. Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 296 (1991)
59. Kassin S, Neumann K: On the power of confession evidence: an experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law Hum Behav 21:460-484, 1997
60. White WS: False confessions and the constitution: safeguards against untrustworthy evidence. Harv CR-CL L Rev 32:105-157, 1997
61. Leo R, Richman KD: Mandate the electronic recording of police interrogations. Crime Public Policy 6:791-798, 1997