Strategies for Preventing False Confessions and Their Consequences

Practical Psychology for Forensic Investigations and Prosecutions

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 121-149

  Davis, Deborah ^a   Leo, Richard ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Escalating public pressure; FBI profiler; Juvenile records; Medical student; Multiple perpetrators

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350651261     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470713389.ch7     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 US 279 (1991).
2. Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.
3. Bedau, H.A. & Radelet, M.L. (1987). Miscarriages of justice in potentially capital cases. Stanford Law Review, 40.
4. Bull, R. & Milne, B. (2004). Attempts to improve the police interviewing of suspects. In G.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 182-196). New York: Kluwer Academic.
5. California v. Bradley Page, 2 Cal. App. 4th 161 (1991).
6. Conlon, E. (2004). Blue blood. New York: Riverhead Books.
7. Connery, D.S. (1977). Guilty until proven innocent. New York: Putnam's Sons.
8. Connors, E., Lundregan, T., Miller, N. & McEwen, T. (1996). Convicted by juries, exonerated by science: Case studies in the use of DNA evidence to establish innocence after trial. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
9. Davis, D. (2004, February). The road to perdition. Paper presented at the California Attorneys for Criminal Justice, Monterey, CA.
10. Davis, D. & Follette, W.C. (2002). Rethinking probative value of evidence: Base rates, intuitive profiling and the postdiction of behavior. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 133-158.
11. Davis, D. & Follette, W.C. (2003). Toward an empirical approach to evidentiary ruling. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 661-684.
12. Davis, D. & Friedman, R.D. (in press). Memory for conversation: The orphan child of eyewitness researchers. In M.P. Toglia, J.D. Read, D.R. Ross and R.C.L. Lindsay (Eds), Handbook of eyewitness memory (Vol. 1): Memory for events. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Davis, D., Kemmelmeier, M. & Follette, W.C. (2005). Conversational memory on trial. In Y.I. Noy and W. Karwowski (Eds), Handbook of human factors in litigation (pp. 12-29). New York: CRC Press.
14. Davis, D., Leo, R., Knaack, D. & Bailey, D. (2006). Sympathetic detectives with time limited offers: Effects on perceived consequences of confession. Association for Psychological Science, New York, NY.
15. Davis, D. & Loftus, E.F. (in press). Internal and external sources of distortion in adult witness memory. In M.P. Toglia, J.D. Read, D.R. Ross and R.C.L. Lindsay (Eds), Handbook of eyewitness memory (Vol. 1): Memory for events. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Davis, D.&O'Donahue,W. (2004). The road to perdition: Extreme influence tactics in the interrogation room. In W. O' Donahue (Ed.), Handbook of forensic psychology (pp. 897-996). San Diego: Academic Press.
17. Drizin, S. & Colgan, B. (2004). Tales from the juvenile front: A guide to how standard police interrogation tactics can produce coerced and false confessions from juvenile suspects. In G.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 127-162). New York: Kluwer Academic.
18. Drizin, S.A. & Leo, R.A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891-1007.
19. Drizin, S.A. & Reich, M.J. (2004). Heeding the lessons of history: The need for mandatory recording of police interrogations to accurately assess the reliability and voluntariness of confessions. Drake Law Review, 52, 619-646.
20. Forrest, K.D.,Wadkins, T.A. & Miller, R.L. (2002). The role of preexisting stress on false confessions: An empirical study. Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology. 3, 23-45.
21. Geller,W.A. (1993). Videotaping interrogations and confessions. National Institute of Justice: Research in Brief. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
22. Grisso, T. (1998a). Forensic evaluation of juveniles. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources.
23. Grisso, T. (1998b). Instruments for assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda rights. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resources.
24. Gudjonsson, G.H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
25. Hartwig, M., Granhag, P.A., Strömwall, L.A. & Vrij, A. (2004). Police officers' lie detection accuracy: Interrogating freely vs observing video. Police Quarterly, 7, 429-456.
26. Holmberg, U. & Christianson, S.A. (2002). Murderers' and sexual offenders' experiences of police interviews and their inclination to admit and deny crimes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 20, 31-45.
27. Horselenberg, R., Merckelbach, H. & Josephs, S. (2003). Individual differences and false confessions: A conceptual replication of Kassin and Keichel (1996). Psychology, Crime and Law, 9, 1-8.
28. Inbau, F.E., Reid, J.E., Buckley, J.P. & Jayne, B. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions (4th ed.). Maryland: Aspen Publishers.
29. Jayne, B.C. & Buckley, J.P. (1992). Criminal interrogation techniques on trial. Security Management, 36, 64-67.
30. Kamisar, Y. (1980). Police interrogation and confessions: Essays in law and policy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
31. Kamisar, Y., LaFave,W., Israel, J. & King, N.J. (2005). Modern criminal procedure:Cases, comments and questions (11th ed.). St Paul, MN: West.
32. Kassin, S.M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52(3), 221-233.
33. Kassin, S.M. (2002, November 1). False confessions and the jogger case. The New York Times.
34. Kassin, S. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215-228.
35. Kassin, S.M. & Fong, C.T. (1999). "I'm innocent!": Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 499-516.
36. Kassin, S.M. & Gudjonsson, G.H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.
37. Kassin, S.M. & Kiechel, K.L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions:Compliance, internalization & confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125-128.
38. Kassin, S.M. & McNall, K. (1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233-251.
39. Kassin, S.M. & Norwick, R.J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights:The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.
40. Lassiter, G.D. & Greers, A.L. (2004a). Bias and accuracy in the evaluation of confession evidence. In G.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. New York: Kluwer Academic.
41. Lassiter, G.D. & Greers, A.L. (2004b). Evaluation of confession evidence: Effects of presentation format. InG.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment. New York: Kluwer Academic.
42. Lassiter, G.D., Greers, A.L., Munhall, P.J., Handley, I.M. & Beers, M.J. (2001). Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera? In M.P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 33, pp. 189-254). San Diego:Academic Press.
43. Leo, R.A. (1996a). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266-303.
44. Leo, R.A. (1996b). The impact of Miranda revisited. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 621-692.
45. Leo, R.A. (2001). False confessions: Causes, consequences and solutions. In S.D. Westervelt (Ed.), Wrongly convicted: Perspectives on failed justice (pp. 36-54). Newark, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
46. Leo, R.A. & Ofshe, R.J. (1998). The consequences of false confessions: Deprivations of liberty and miscarriages of justice in the age of psychological interrogation. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 88, 429-496.
47. Leo, R.A. & Ofshe, R.J. (2001). The truth about false confessions and advocacy scholarship. Criminal Law Bulletin, 37, 293-370.
48. Leo, R.A. & White, W.S. (1999). Adapting to Miranda: Modern interrogators' strategies for dealing with the obstacles posed by Miranda. Minnesota Law Review, 84, 397-472.
49. Loftus, E. and Ketcham (1991). Witness for the defense. New York: St. Martin's Press.
50. Lykken, D.T. (1998). Tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum.
51. Meissner, C.A. & Kassin, S.M. (2002). "He's guilty!": Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 469-480.
52. Meissner, C.A. & Kassin, S.M. (2004). "You're guilty, so just confess!" Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In G.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 85-106). New York: Kluwer Academic.
53. Morgan, C.A., III, Hazlett, G., Doran, A., Garrett, S., Hoyt, G., Thomas, P., et al. (2004). Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 265-279.
54. Moston, S., Stephenson, G.M. & Williamson, T.M. (1992). The effects of case characteristics on suspect behavior during questioning. British Journal of Criminology, 32, 23-40.
55. Nickerson, R.S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220.
56. Oakland Police Department (1998).
57. Ofshe, R.J. & Leo, R.A. (1997a). The social psychology of police interrogation:The theory and classification of true and false confessions. Studies in Law, Politics and Society, 16, 189-251.
58. Ofshe, R.J. & Leo, R.A. (1997b). The decision to confess falsely: Rational choice and irrational action. Denver University Law Review, 74, 979-1122.
59. O'Sullivan, M. & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. In P.A. Granhag & L.A. Strömwall (Eds), Deception detection in forensic contexts (pp. 269-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
60. Radelet, M.L., Bedau, H.A. & Putnam, C.E. (1992). In spite of innocence: Erroneous convictions in capital cases. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
61. Redlich, A.D. & Goodman, G.S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed:The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27(2), 141-156.
62. Risinger, D.M., Saks, M.J., Thompson, W.C. & Rosenthal, R. (2002). The Daubert/Kumho implications of observer effects in forensic science: Hidden problems of expectation and suggestion. California Law Review, 90, 1-56.
63. Ross, L.D. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173-220). New York: Academic Press.
64. Russano, M.B., Meissner, C.A., Narchet, F.M. & Kassin, S.M. (2005). Investigating true and false confessions within a novel experimental paradigm. Psychological Science, 16(6), 481-486.
65. Sauer, M. (2004). Former detective won't say Tuite was overlooked. Union-Tribune, p. B1.
66. Scheck, B., Neufield, P. & Dwyer, J. (2000). Actual innocence. Garden City, NY:Doubleday.
67. Senese, L.C. (2005). Anatomy of interrogation themes: The Reid technique of interviewing and interrogation. Chicago: John Reid Assoc.
68. State of New Jersey v. Patrick Free, 798 A.2d 83 (NJ 2002).
69. Sullivan, T.P. (2004). Police experiences with recording custodial interrogations. Chicago: Center on Wrongful Convictions, Northwestern University School of Law.
70. Tracey, P. (2003). Who killed Stephanie Crowe? Dallas: Brown.
71. United States v. Hall, 93 F.3d 1337 (7th Cir. 1996).
72. United States v. Hall, 974 F. Supp. 1198 (1997).
73. Vanous, S. & Davis, D. (2002). Murder scripts: Perceived motives and means for spouse murder. Salt Lake City: Rocky Mountain Psychological Association.
74. Vrij, A. (2000). Detecting lies and deceit: The psychology of lying and the implications for professional practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
75. Vrij, A. (2004). Why professionals fail to catch liars and how they can improve. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 9, 159-181.
76. Vrij, A. & Mann, S. (2001). Who killed my relative? Police officers' ability to detect real-life high stakes lies. Psychology, Crime and Law, 7, 119-132.
77. Warden, R. (2003). The role of false confessions in Illinois: Wrongful murder convictions since 1970. Chicago: Center on Wrongful Convictions, Northwestern University School of Law.
78. White, W.S. (2001a). Miranda's waning protections. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
79. White, W.S. (2001b). Miranda's failure to restrain pernicious interrogation practices. Michigan Law Review, 99, 1211-1247.