Algebraic multilevel preconditioner for the Helmholtz equation in heterogeneous media

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 3781-3805

  Bollhöfer, Matthias ^a   Grote, Marcus J ^b   Schenk, Olaf ^b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Algebraic multilevel preconditioning; Graph pivoting; Helmholtz equation; Inhomogeneous media; Inverse based pivoting; Symmetric indefinite matrix

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

ALGEBRAIC MULTILEVEL PRECONDITIONING; GRAPH-PIVOTING; HELMHOLTZ'S EQUATIONS; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA; INHOMOGENEOUS MEDIUM; INVERSE-BASED PIVOTING; MULTILEVEL PRECONDITIONERS; MULTILEVEL PRECONDITIONING; MULTILEVELS; SYMMETRIC INDEFINITE MATRIXES;

HELMHOLTZ EQUATION;

EID: 70350470442     PISSN: 10648275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/080725702     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. T. Airaksinen, E. Heikkola, A. Pennanen, and J. Toivanen, An algebraic multigrid based shifted-Laplacian preconditioner for the Helmholtz equation, J. Comput. Phys., 226 (2007), pp. 1196-1210.
2. J. I. Aliaga, M. Bollhöfer, A. F. Martín, and E. S. Quintana-Ortí, Parallelization of multilevel preconditioners constructed from inverse-based ILUs on shared-memory multiprocessors, in Parallel Computing: Architectures, Algorithms and Applications, Vol. 38, C. Bischof, M. Bücker, P. Gibbon, G. R. Joubert, T. Lippert, B. Mohr, and F. Peters, eds., IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2008, pp. 287-294.
3. F. Aminzadeh, J. Brac, and T. Kunz, 3-D Salt and Overthrust Models, SEG/EAGE 3-D Modeling Series 1, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, 1997.
4. I. M. Babuska and S. A. Sauter, Is the pollution effect of the FEM avoidable for the Helmholtz equation considering high wave numbers?, SIAM Rev., 42 (2000), pp. 451-484.
5. R. E. Bank, A comparison of two multilevel iterative methods for nonsymmetric and indefinite elliptic finite element equations, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 18 (1981), pp. 724-743.
6. A. Bayliss, C. I. Goldstein, and E. Turkel, An iterative method for the Helmholtz equation, J. Comput. Phys., 49 (1983), pp. 443-457.
7. A. Bayliss, C. I. Goldstein, and E. Turkel, On accuracy conditions for the numerical computation of waves, J. Comput. Phys., 59 (1985), pp. 396-404.
8. J.-D. Benamou and B. Després, A domain decomposition method for the Helmholtz equation and related optimal control problems, J. Comput. Phys., 136 (1997), pp. 62-82.
9. M. Benzi, J. C. Haws, and M. Tuma, Preconditioning highly indefinite and nonsymmetric matrices, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 22 (2000), pp. 1333-1353.
10. M. Bollhöfer and Y. Saad, Multilevel preconditioners constructed from inverse-based ILUs, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 27 (2006), pp. 1627-1650. (Pubitemid 44418654)
11. A. Brandt and I. Livshits, Wave-ray multigrid method for standing wave equations, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 6 (1997), pp. 162-181. (Pubitemid 38870910)
12. J. R. Bunch and L. Kaufman, Some stable methods for calculating inertia and solving symmetric linear systems, Math. Comp., 31 (1977), pp. 163-179.
13. X.-C. Cai, M. A. Casarin, Jr., F. W. Elliott, and O. B. Widlund, Overlapping Schwarz algorithms for solving Helmholtz's equation, Contemp. Math., 218 (1998), pp. 391-399.
14. X.-C. Cai and O. B. Widlund, Domain decomposition algorithms for indefinite elliptic problems, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 13 (1992), pp. 243-258.
15. A. K. Cline, C. B. Moler, G. W. Stewart, and J. H. Wilkinson, An estimate for the condition number of a matrix, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 16 (1979), pp. 368-375.
16. F. Collino, S. Ghanemi, and P. Joly, Domain decomposition method for harmonic wave propagation: A general presentation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 184 (2000), pp. 171-211. (Pubitemid 30255215)
17. I. S. Duff and J. Koster, The design and use of algorithms for permuting large entries to the diagonal of sparse matrices, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 20 (1999), pp. 889-901. (Pubitemid 129330049)
18. I. S. Duff and S. Pralet, Strategies for scaling and pivoting for sparse symmetric indefinite problems, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., 27 (2005), pp. 313-340.
19. H. C. Elman, O. G. Ernst, and D. P. O'Leary, A multigrid method enhanced by Krylov subspace iteration for discrete Helmholtz equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 23 (2001), pp. 1291-1315.
20. Y. A. Erlangga, C. W. Oosterlee, and C. Vuik, A novel multigrid based preconditioner for heterogeneous Helmholtz problems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 27 (2006), pp. 1471-1492. (Pubitemid 44077336)
21. Y. A. Erlangga, C. Vuik, and C. W. Oosterlee, On a class of preconditioners for solving the Helmholtz equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 50 (2004), pp. 409-425.
22. C. Farhat and J. Li, An iterative domain decomposition method for the solution of a class of indefinite problems in computational structural dynamics, Appl. Numer. Math., 54 (2005), pp. 150-166. (Pubitemid 40710175)
23. C. Farhat, A. Macedo, and M. Lesoinne, A two-level domain decomposition method for the iterative solution of high frequency exterior Helmholtz problems, Numer. Math., 85 (2000), pp. 283-308.
24. D. G. Feingold and R. S. Varga, Block diagonally dominant matrices and generalization of the gershgorin circle theorem, Pacific J. Math., 12 (1962), pp. 1241-1250.
25. R. Freund and F. Jarre, A QMR-based interior-point algorithm for solving linear programs, Math. Program. Ser. B, 76 (1997), pp. 183-210. (Pubitemid 127417010)
26. R. Freund and N. Nachtigal, Software for simplified Lanczos and QMR algorithms, Appl. Numer. Math., 19 (1995), pp. 319-341.
27. M. J. Gander, F. Magoul̀es, and F. Nataf, Optimized Schwarz methods without overlap for the Helmholtz equation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2002), pp. 38-60.
28. A. George, Nested dissection of a regular finite element mesh, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 10 (1973), pp. 345-363.
29. A. Gupta and L. Ying, A Fast Maximum-Weight-Bipartite-Matching Algorithm for Reducing Pivoting in Sparse Gaussian Elimination, Technical report RC 21576 (97320), IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, 1999.
30. M. Hagemann and O. Schenk, Weighted matchings for preconditioning of symmetric indefinite linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 28 (2006), pp. 403-420. (Pubitemid 46422098)
31. G. Karypis and V. Kumar, A fast and high quality multilevel scheme for partitioning irregular graphs, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 20 (1998), pp. 359-392. (Pubitemid 128689516)
32. S. Kim, Parallel multidomain iterative algorithms for the Helmholtz wave equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 17 (1995), pp. 411-429.
33. S. Kim and S. Kim, Multigrid simulations for high-frequency solutions of the Helmholtz problem in heterogeneous media, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24 (2002), pp. 684-701.
34. H. W. Kuhn, The Hungarian method for solving the assignment problem, Naval Res. Logist. Quart., 2 (1955), pp. 83-97.
35. A. L. Laird and M. B. Giles, Preconditioned Iterative Solution of the 2D Helmholtz Equation, Technical report 02/12, Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Oxford, 2002.
36. B. Lee, T. A. Manteuffel, S. F. McCormick, and J. Ruge, First-order system least-squares for the Helmholtz equation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 21 (2000), pp. 1927-1949.
37. X. S. Li and J. W. Demmel, SuperLU DIST: A scalable distributed-memory sparse direct solver for unsymmetric linear systems, ACM Trans. Math. Software, 29 (2003), pp. 110-140. (Pubitemid 40001447)
38. M. M. M. Made, Incomplete factorization based preconditionings for solving the Helmholtz equation, Internat. J. Numer. Methods Engrg., 50 (2001), pp. 1077-1101. (Pubitemid 32258669)
39. C. D. Meyer, Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra, SIAM, Philadelphia, 2000.
40. J. Munkres, Algorithms for the assignment and transportation problems, J. SIAM, 5 (1957), pp. 32-38.
41. M. Olschowka and A. Neumaier, A new pivoting strategy for Gaussian elimination, Linear Algebra Appl., 240 (1996), pp. 131-151. (Pubitemid 126362926)
42. C. D. Riyanti, Y. A. Erlangga, R.-E. Plessix, W. A. Mulder, C. Vuik, and C. Oosterlee, A new iterative solver for the time-harmonic wave equation, Geophysics, 71 (2006), pp. E57-E63. (Pubitemid 44419902)
43. C. D. Riyanti, A. Kononov, Y. A. Erlangga, C. Vuik, C. W. Oosterlee, R.-E. Plessix, and W. A. Mulder, A parallel multigrid-based preconditioner for the 3d heterogeneous high-frequency Helmholtz equation, J. Comput. Phys., 224 (2007), pp. 431-448.
44. P. R. Amestoy, I. S. Duff, D. Ruiz, and B. Ucar, A parallel matrix scaling algorithm, in High Performance Computing for Computational Science, VECPAR 2008, Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci. 5336, Springer, Berlin, 2008, pp. 301-313.
45. Y. Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems, 2nd ed., SIAM, Philadelphia, 2003.
46. A. H. Schatz, An observation concerning Ritz-Galerkin methods with indefinite bilinear forms, Math. Comp., 28 (1974), pp. 959-962.
47. O. Schenk, M. Bollhöfer, and R. A. Römer, On large-scale diagonalization techniques for the Anderson model of localization, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 28 (2006), pp. 963-983. (Pubitemid 46785411)
48. O. Schenk, M. Bollhöfer, and R. A. Römer, On large-scale diagonalization techniques for the Anderson model of localization, SIAM Rev., 50 (2008), pp. 91-112. (Pubitemid 351386906)
49. O. Schenk and K. Gärtner, On fast factorization pivoting methods for symmetric indefinite systems, Electron. Trans. Numer. Anal., 23 (2006), pp. 158-179. (Pubitemid 46092256)
50. O. Schenk, S. Röllin, and A. Gupta, The effects of unsymmetric matrix permutations and scalings in semiconductor device and circuit simulation, IEEE Trans. Computer-Aided Design Integrated Circuits Syst., 23 (2004), pp. 400-411.
51. H. A. van der Vorst, Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant of Bi-CG for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems, SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput., 13 (1992), pp. 631-644.
52. M. B. van Gijzen, Y. A. Erlangga, and C. Vuik, Spectral analysis of the discrete Helmholtz operator preconditioned with a shifted Laplacian, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 29 (2007), pp. 1942-1958.