The sum of the parts detracts from the intended whole: Competencies and in-training assessments

Medical Education

Volumn 43, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 741-748

  Zibrowski, Elaine M ^a   Singh, Indu ^a   Goldszmidt, Mark A ^a   Watling, Christopher J ^a   Kenyon, Cynthia F ^a   Schulz, Valerie ^a   Maddocks, Heather L ^b   Lingard, Lorelei ^c  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL EXPERT; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PHYSICIAN; RESIDENT;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; ONTARIO; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 70350339771     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: 13652923     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03404.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ten Cate O, Scheele F. Competency-based postgraduate training: can we bridge the gap between theory and clinical practice? Acad Med 2007;82 (6):542-547.
2. Norman G. Outcomes, objectives, and the seductive appeal of simple solutions. Adv Health Sci Educ 2006;11:217-220.
3. Grant J. The incapacitating effects of competence: a critique. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 1999;4:271-277.
4. Huddle TS, Heudebert GR. Taking apart the art: the risk of anatomising clinical competence. Acad Med 2007;82 (6):536-541.
5. ten Cate O. Trust, competence, and the supervisor's role in postgraduate training. BMJ 2006;333 (7571):748-751.
6. Frank JR, ed. The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa, ON: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada 2005.
7. Chou S, Cole G, McLaughlin K, Lockyer J. CanMEDS evaluation in Canadian postgraduate training programmes: tools used and programme director satisfaction. Med Educ 2008;42:879-886.
8. Freiman A, Natsheh A, Barakin B, Shear NH. Dermatology postgraduate training in Canada: CanMEDS competencies. Dermatol Online J 2006;12:6.
9. Verma S, Flynn L, Seguin R. Faculty's and residents' perceptions of teaching and evaluating the role of Health Advocate: a study at one Canadian university. Acad Med 2005;80:103-108.
10. Kostelnick C. From pen to print: the new visual landscape of professional communication. J Bus Tech Comm 1994;8:91-117.
11. Rosner M. Theories of visual rhetoric: looking at the human genome. J Tech Writ Comm 2001;31 (4):391-413.
12. Barry AM. Visual Intelligence: Perception, Image, and Manipulation in Visual Communication. Albany, NY: SUNY Press 1997.
13. Kress G, van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: the Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge 2000.
14. Varpio L, Spafford MM, Schryer CF, Lingard L. Seeing and listening: a visual and social analysis of optometric record-keeping practices. J Bus Tech Comm 2007;21:343-375.
15. Lingard LA, Haber RJ. What do we mean by 'relevance'? A clinical and rhetorical definition with implications for teaching and learning the case-presentation format. Acad Med 1999;74 (10 Suppl):124-126.
16. Haber RJ, Lingard LA. Learning oral presentation skills. A rhetorical analysis with pedagogical and professional implications. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:308-314.
17. Watling CJ, Kenyon C, Zibrowski E, Schulz V, Goldszmidt M, Singh I, Maddocks H, Lingard L. Rules of engagement: residents' perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Acad Med 2008;83 (Suppl 10):97-100.
18. Kennedy T, Lingard L. Making sense of grounded theory. Med Educ 2006;40 (2):101-108.
19. Kogan JR, Bellini LM, Shea JA. Have you had your feedback today? Acad Med 2000;75 (10):1041.
20. Richards BK. Feedback. Acad Emerg Med 2004;11 (12):1283.