Approaches to dispute resolution in additional support needs in Scotland

European Journal of Special Needs Education

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 355-369

  Riddell, Sheila ^a   Weedon, Elisabet ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Additional support needs; Adjudication; Alternative dispute resolution; Mediation; Parents' rights; Tribunal

Indexed keywords

ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION; ARTICLE; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN RIGHTS; LAW; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PARENTAL ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONALISM; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 70350337328     PISSN: 08856257     EISSN: 1469591X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08856250903223047     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adler, M., and J. Gulland. 2003. Tribunal Users' Experiences, Perceptions and Expectations: A Literature Review (London: Council on Tribunals).
2. Davis, G. 2004. 'A research perspective' in Family Mediation: Past, present and future, ed. Westcott, 59-69. Bristol, UK: Jordan Publishing.
3. Department of Constitutional Affairs. 2004. Transforming public services: Complaints, redress and tribunals. London: The Stationery Office.
4. Department for Education and Science. 1978. Special educational needs. The Warnock report. London: HMSO.
5. Genn, H. 1999. Paths to justice: What do people do and think about going to law? Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.
6. Genn, H., B. Lever, L. Gray, and N. Balmer. 2006. Tribunals for diverse users. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs.
7. Harris, N. 2005. Empowerment and state education: Rights of choice and participation. The Modern Law Review 98, no. 6: 925-7.
8. Her Majesty's Inspectorate for Education. 2007. Report on the implementation of the education (additional support for learning) (Scotland) Act 2004. Livingston, UK: HMIe.
9. Kane, J., G. Lloyd, G. McCluskey, S. Riddell, J. Stead, and E. Weedon. 2007. An evaluation of restorative practices in schools: Issues in implementation. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Executive Education Department.
10. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
11. Riddell, S. 2006. Special educational needs, policy and practice: Additional support for learning. Edinburgh, UK: Dunedin Academic Press.
12. Riddell, S., M. Adler, N. Farmakopoulou, and E. Mordaunt. 2000. Special needs and competing policy frameworks in England and Scotland. Journal of Education Policy 15, no. 6: 621-35.
13. Riddell, S., M. Adler, E. Mordaunt, and A. Wilson. 2003. Procedural justice and special educational needs assessments in England and Scotland. International Journal of Inclusive Education 7, no. 3: 201-22.
14. Riddell, S.I., E. Mordaunt, A. Wilson, and M. Adler. 2002. Parents, professionals and SEN policy frameworks in England and Scotland. Policy and Politics 30, no. 3: 411-27.
15. Scottish Executive. 2005. Supporting children's learning: Code of practice. Edinburgh, UK: The Stationery Office.
16. Scottish Government. 2007. The Crerar review: The report of the Independent Review of Regulation, Audit, Inspection and Complaints Handling of Public Services in Scotland. Edinburgh: The Scottish Government.
17. Tennant, R., M. Callanan, D. Snape, I. Palmer, and J. Read. 2008. Special educational needs disagreement resolution services: National evaluation research report DCSF-RR054. London: DCSF.
18. Vincent, C., and S. Tomlinson. 1997. Home-school relationships: The swarming of disciplinary mechanisms. British Educational Research Journal 23, no. 3: 361-77.