Extending quality in use to provide a framework for usability measurement

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5619 LNCS, Issue , 2009, Pages 13-22

  Bevan, Nigel ^a  

^a Professional Usability Services   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Measurement; Quality in use; Requirements; Safety; Standards; Usability

Indexed keywords

OPERATIONAL USE; QUALITY IN USE; REQUIREMENTS; SAFETY; USABILITY;

EID: 70350241807     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. ANSI: Common industry format for usability test reports (ANSI-NCITS 354-2001). ANSI (2001)
2. Berger, N., Arent, M., Arnowitz, J., Sampson, F.: Effective Prototyping with Excel: A practical handbook for developers and designers. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2009)
3. Bevan, N.: Quality in use: meeting user needs for quality. Journal of Systems and Software 49(1), 89-96 (1999)
4. Bevan, N., Claridge, N., Maguire, M., Athousaki, M.: Specifying and evaluating usability requirements using the Common Industry Format: Four case studies. In: Proceedings of IFIP 17th World Computer Congress, Montreal, Canada, August 25-30, pp. 133-148. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2002)
5. Brooke, J.: SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189-194. Taylor and Francis, Abington (1996)
6. Carver, C.S., Scheier, M.F.: On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)
7. CEC: Minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment Directive (90/270/EEC). Official Journal of the European Communities No L 156, 21/6/90 (1990)
8. Cockton, G.: Putting Value into E-valuation. In: Law, E.L., Hvannberg, E.T., Cockton, G. (eds.) Maturing Usability. Quality in Software, Interaction and Value. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
9. Hassenzahl, M.: The effect of perceived hedonic quality on product appealingness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13, 479-497 (2002)
10. Hassenzahl, M.: The thing and I: Understanding the relationship between user and product. In: Blythe, M., Overbeeke, C., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 31-42. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2003)
11. Hassenzahl, M.: AttrakDiff(tm), http://www.attrakdiff.de
12. Hornbæk, K.: Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64, 79-102 (2006)
13. ISO/IEC 9126: Software engineering - Product quality. ISO (1991)
14. ISO/IEC 9126-1: Software engineering - Product quality - Part 1: Quality model. ISO (2001)
15. ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) Part 11: Guidance on Usability. ISO (1998)
16. ISO 9241-171: Ergonomics of human-system interaction - Part 171: Guidance on software accessibility. ISO (2008)
17. ISO/IEC CD 25010.3: Systems and software engineering - Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Software product quality and system quality in use models. ISO (2009)
18. ISO/IEC 25062: Software Engineering - Software product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE)-Common Industry Format (CIF) for Usability Test Reports. ISO (2006)
19. Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A.M., Drury, C.G.: Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of cognitive Ergonomics 4(1), 53-71 (2000)
20. Kirakowski, J.: The Software Usability Measurement Inventory: Background and Usage. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor and Francis, Abington (1996)
21. National Audit Office: United Kingdom Passport Agency: The passport delays of Summer 1999. Publication HC 812 1998-1999 (1999)
22. Nielsen, J.: Usability Engineering. Academic Press, London (1993)
23. Norman, D.: Emotional design: Why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, New York (2004)
24. Norman, K., Alm, H., Wigaeus Tornqvist, E., Toomingas, A.: Reliability of a questionnaire and an ergonomic checklist for assessing working conditions and health at call centres. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 12, 53-68 (2006)
25. Theofanos, M., Stanton, B., Bevan, N.: A practical guide to the CIF: Usability Measurements. Interactions 18(6), 34-37 (2006)
26. Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI): Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/