Durability of resistance in tomato and pepper to xanthomonads causing bacterial spot

Annual Review of Phytopathology

Volumn 47, Issue , 2009, Pages 265-284

  Stall, Robert E ^a   Jones, Jeffrey B ^a   Minsavage, Gerald V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial effectors; Hypersensitive resistance; Quantitative trait resistance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GENE; GENETICS; IMMUNOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; PEPPER; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT DISEASE; PLANT GENE; TOMATO; XANTHOMONAS;

CAPSICUM; GENES, BACTERIAL; GENES, PLANT; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PLANT DISEASES; PLANTS; XANTHOMONAS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; XANTHOMONAS;

EID: 70350241356     PISSN: 00664286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081752     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Alexander LJ, Lincoln RE, Wright V. 1942. A survey of the genus Lycopersicon for resistance to the important tomato diseases occurring in Ohio and Indiana. Plant Dis. Reptr. Suppl. 136:51-85
2. 2. Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Davis MJ, Bonas U, Jones JB. 2000. Resistance of tomato and pepper to T3 strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria is specified by a plant-inducible avirulence gene. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 13:911-921 (Pubitemid 30648039)
3. 3. Astua-Monge G, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Vellejos CE, Davis MJ, Jones JB. 2000. Xv4-avrXv4a: a new gene-for-gene interaction identified between Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria race T3 and the wild tomato relative Lycopersiconpennellii. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 13:1346-1355 (Pubitemid 30948133)
4. 4. Ballvora A, Pierre M, Van Den Ackerveken G, Schornack S, Rossier O, et al. 2001. Genetic mapping and functional analysis of the tomato Bs4 locus governing recognition of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria AvrBs4 protein. Mol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 14:629-638 (Pubitemid 32333383)
5. 5. Bonas U, Conrads-Strauch J, Balboa I. 1993. Resistance in tomato to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria is determined by alleles of the pepper-specific avirulence gene avrBs3. Mol. Gen. Genet. 238:261-269 (Pubitemid 23130658)
6. Bonas U, Stall RE, Staskawicz BJ. 1989. Genetic and structural characterization of the avirulence gene avrBs3 from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Mol. Gen. Genet. 218:127-136
7. Bongiolo Neto A, Reifschneider FJB, Takatsu A. 1986. Levantamento de grupos de Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria no Brazil. Fitopatol. Bras. 11:881-889
8. Burkholder WH, Li CC. 1941. Variations in Phytomonas vesicatoria. Phytopathology 31:753-755
9. Canteros BI, Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Stall RE. 1995. Diversity of plasmids in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Phytopathology 85:1482-1486
10. Canteros BI, Minsavage GV, Bonas U, Pring D, Stall RE. 1991. A gene from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria that determines avirulence in tomato is related to avrBs3. Mol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 4:628-632
11. Conover RA, Gerhold NR. 1981. Mixtures of copper and maneb or mancozeb for control of bacterial spot of tomato and their compatibility for control of fungus diseases. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 94:154-156
12. Cook AA. 1973. Characterization of hypersensitivity in Capsicum annuum induced by the tomato strain of Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Phytopathology 63:915-918
13. Cook AA. 1984. Florida XVR 3-25 bell pepper. HortScience 19:735
14. Cook AA, Guevara YG. 1984. Hypersensitivity in Capsicum chacoense to race 1 of the bacterial spot pathogen of pepper. Plant Dis. 68:329-330
15. Cook AA, Stall RE. 1963. Inheritance of resistance in pepper to bacterial spot. Phytopathology 53:1060-1062
16. Cook AA, Stall RE. 1969. Differentiation of pathotypes among isolates of Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Plant Dis. Reptr. 53:617-619
17. Cook AA, Stall RE. 1982. Distribution of races of Xanthomonas vesicatoria pathogenic on pepper. Plant Dis. 66:388-389
18. Cox RS. 1966. The role of bacterial spot in tomato production in south Florida. Plant Dis. Reptr. 50:699-700
19. Cox RS, Conover RA, Sowell G Jr. 1956. Symptomology of bacterial spot of tomato and pepper in southern Florida. Phytopathology 46:582-584
20. Coyne DP, Schuster ML. 1967. A source of tolerance and reaction of tomato species and varieties to bacterial spot pathogen. Plant Dis. Reptr. 51:25-28
21. Grill P, Jones JP, Burgis DS. 1972. Relative susceptibility of some tomato genotypes to bacterial spot. Plant Dis. Reptr. 56:504-507
22. Dahlbeck D, Stall RE. 1979. Mutations for change of race in cultures of Xanthomonas vesicatoria. Phytopathology 69:634-636
23. Doidge EM. 1920. A tomato canker. Ann. Appl. Biol. 7:407-430
24. Eshed Y, Zamir D. 1994. A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79:175-179
25. Flor HH. 1955. Host-parasite interactions in flaxrust-Its genetics and other implications. Phytopathology 45:680-685
26. Francis DM, Miller SA. 2005. Ohio 9834 and Ohio 9816: Processing tomato breeding lines with partial resistance to race T1 of bacterial spot. HortScience 40:1566-1568
27. Gardner MW, Kendrick JB. 1921. Bacterial spot of tomato. J. Agric. Res. 21:123-162
28. Gardner MW, Kendrick JB. 1923. Bacterial spot of tomato and pepper. Phytopathology 13:307-315
29. 29. Gassman W, Dahlbeck D, Chesnokova O, Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Staskawicz BJ. 2000. Molecular evolution of virulence in natural field strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. J. Bacterial. 182:7053-7059 (Pubitemid 32259610)
30. Goode MJ, Sasser M. 1980. Prevention-the key to controlling bacterial spot and bacterial speck of tomato. Plant Dis. 64:831-834
31. Herbers K, Conrads-Strauch J, Bonas U. 1992. Race-specificity of plant resistance to bacterial spot disease determined by repetitive motifs in a bacterial avirulence protein. Nature (Land.) 356:172-174
32. Hibberd AM, Bassett MJ, Stall RE. 1987. Allelism tests of 3 dominant genes for hypersensitive resistance to bacterial spot of pepper. Phytopathology 77:1304-1307
33. Hibberd AM, Stall RE, Bassett MJ. 1987. Different phenotypes associated with incompatible races and resistance genes in bacterial spot of pepper. Plant Dis. 71:1075-1078
34. Hibberd AM, Gillespie D. 1982. Heritability of field resistance to bacterial leaf spot disease in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Sci. entia Hort. 17:301-309
35. Hibberd AM, Stall RE, Bassett MJ. 1988. Quantitatively assessed resistance to bacterial spot in pepper that is simply inherited. Phytopathology 78:607-612
36. Higgins BB. 1922. The bacterial spot of pepper. Phytopathology 12:501-517
37. Horsfell JG, McDonald ADM. 1940. Variety susceptibility of pepper to bacterial spot. Plant Dis. Reptr. 24:34-36
38. Jones JB, Bouzar H, Somodi GC, Stall RE, Pernezney K, et al. 1988. Evidence for the preemptive nature of tomato race3 of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in Florida. Phytopathology 88:33-38
39. 39. Jones JB, Lacy GH, Bouzar H, Stall RE, Schaad NW. 2004. Reclassification of the xanthomonads associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper. System. Appl. Microbiol. 27:755-762 (Pubitemid 39593388)
40. Jones JB, Minsavage GV, Roberts PD, Johnson RR, Kousik CS, et al. 2002. A non-hypersensitive resistance in pepper to the bacterial spot pathogen is associated with two recessive genes. Phytopathology 92:273-277
41. Jones JB, Pohronezney KL, Stall RE, Jones JP. 1986. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in Florida on tomato crop residue, weeds, seeds, and volunteer plants. Phytopathology 76:430-434
42. Jones JB, Scott JW. 1986. Hypersensitive response in tomato to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Dis. 80:337-339
43. Jones JB, Stall RE. 1998. Diversity among xandiomonads pathogenic on pepper and tomato. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 36:41-58
44. 44. Jordan T, Romer P, Meyer A, Szczesny R, Pierre M, et al. 2006. Physical delimitation of the pepper Bs3 resistance gene specifying recognition of the AvrBs3 protein from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Theor. Appl, Genet. 133:895-905 (Pubitemid 44272980)
45. 45. Kay S, Hahn S, Marois E, Hause G, Bonas U. 2007. A bacterial effector acts as a transcription factor and induces cell size regulators. Science 318:648-651 (Pubitemid 350014839)
46. 46. Kearney B, Staskawicz BJ. 1990. Characterization of IS476 and its role in bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper. J. Bacterial. 172:143-148 (Pubitemid 20016825)
47. 47. Kearney B, Staskawicz BJ. 1990. Widespread distribution and fitness contribution of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria avirulence gene avrBs2. Nature (Land.) 346:385-386 (Pubitemid 20226047)
48. Kim BS, Hartmann RW. 1985. Inheritance of a gene (Bs3) conferring hypersensitive resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in pepper (Capsicum annuum). Plant Dis. 69:233-235
49. Kimura O, Robbs CF, Ribiero RLD, Akiba F, Sudo S. 1972. Identification of pathotypes of Xanthomonas vesicatoria (Doidge) Dowson occurring in the central-south region of Brazil. Arq. Inst. Biol., Sao Paulo 39:43-49
50. Klement Z, Farcas GL, Lovrekovidi L. 1964. Hypersensitive reaction induced by phytopathogenic bacteria in tobacco leaf. Phytopathology 54:474-477
51. 51. Kousik CS, Ritchie DR. 1998. Response of bell pepper cultivars to bacterial spot pathogen races that individually overcome major resistance genes. Plant Dis. 82:181-186 (Pubitemid 28065715)
52. Kousik CS, Ritchie DR. 1996. Race shift in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria within a season in field-grown pepper. Phytopathology 86:952-958
53. Kousik CS, Ritchie DF. 1996. Disease potential of pepper bacterial spot pathogen races that overcome the Bs2 gene for resistance. Phytopathology 86:1336-1343
54. Kousik CS, Ritchie DF. 1995. Isolation of pepper races 4 and 5 of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria from diseased peppers in southeastern U. S. fields. Plant Dis. 79:540
55. Lawson VF, Summers WL. 1984. Disease reaction of diverse sources of Lycopersicon to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria pepper strain race2. Plant Dis. 68:117-119
56. Leben C. 1963. Multiplication of Xanthomonas vesicatoria on tomato seedlings. Phytopathology 53:778-781
57. McGuire RG, Jones JB, Stanley CD, Cszinsky AA. 1991. Epiphytic populations of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria and bacterial spot of tomato as influenced lay nitrogen and potassium fertilization. Phytopathology 81:656-660
58. Marco GM, Stall RE. 1983. Control of bacterial spot of pepper initiated by strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria that differ in sensitivity to copper. Plant Dis. 67:779-781
59. Matthee FN, Daines RH. 1968. Effects of soil types and substrate aeration on stomatal activity, water diffusion pressure deficit, water congestion, and bacterial infection of peach and pepper foliage. Phytopathology 58:1298-1301
60. Mendes de Souza MF, Rodrigues R, Teixeira do Amaral A Jr, Sidre CP. 2008. Resistance to Xanthomonas spp. In tomato: Diallel analysis and gene effects estimative in a breeding programme carried out in Brazil. J. Phytopathol. 156:660-667
61. Minsavage GV, Dahlbeck D, Whalen MC, Kearney B, Bonas U, et al. 1990. Gene-for-gene relationships specifying disease resistance in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria-pepper interactions. Mol. PlantMicrobe Interact. 3:41-47
62. Minsavage GV, Jones JB, Stall RE, Miller S, Ritchie. 1999. Hypersensitive resistance in Capsicumpubescens PI 23047 to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria elicited by avrBs3-2. Phytopathology 89:S53 (absttact)
63. Mundt CC. 2002. Use of multiline cultivars and cultivar mixtures for disease management. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 40:381-410
64. Nagai H, Sugimori MIL 1986. Suscetibilidade dos tomateiros 'H7998' a 'C-28' a pustule bacteriana (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria) em Sao Paulo. Hort. Bras. 4:62. (Absttact)
65. Nayudu MV, Walker JC. 1960. Bacterial spot of tomato as influenced by temperawre and by age and nutrition of the host. Phytopathology 50:360-364
66. Nino-Liu DO, Ronald PC, Boganove AJ. 2006. Xanthomonas oryzae pathovars, model pathogens of a model crop. Mol. Plant Pathol. 7:303-324
67. Orton WA. 1909. The development of farm crops resistant to disease. 17. S. Depart. Agrie. Yearbook 1908:453-464
68. Pernezny K, Collins J. 1999. A serious outbreak of race 6 of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria on pepper in southern Florida. Plant Dis. 83:79
69. Pohronezny K, Schuster DJ, Sonoda RM. 1986. Integrated pest management for Florida tomatoes. Plant Dis. 70:96-102
70. Pohronezny K, Moss MA, Dankers W, Schenk J. 1990. Dispersal and management of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria during thinning of direct-seeded tomato. Plant Dis. 74:800-805
71. Pohronezny K, Stall RE, Canteros BI, Kegley M, Datnoff LE, Subramanya R. 1992. Sudden shift in the prevalent race of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in pepper in southern Florida. Plant Dis. 76:118-20
72. Ritchie DF, Kousik CS, Paxton TC. 1998. Response of bacterial spot pathogen strains to four major resistance genes in pepper. Proc. Natl. Pepper Conf., San Antonio, 1998. p 14.
73. Riva EM, Rodrigues R, Pereira MG, Sudre CP, Karasawa R. 2004. Inheritance of bacterial spot disease in Capsicum annuum L. Crop Breeding Appl. Biotechnol. 4:490-494
74. Riva EM, Rodrigues R, Sudre CP, Karasawa. M, Pereira MG. 2004. Three recessive genes controlling bacterial spot resistance in pepper. In Proc. 17th Intern. Pepper Conf, ed. G McAvoy, p. 21. Univ. FIa. IFAS Ext. (abstract)
75. 75. Roden J, Eardley L, Hotson A, Cao Y, Mudgett MB. 2004. Characterization of the Xanthomonas AvrXv effector, a SUMO protease translocated into plant cells. Mol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 17:633-643 (Pubitemid 38642207)
76. Rodrigues R, Stall RE, Minsavage GV, Jones JB. 2004. Hypersensitive response to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria race 6 in Capsicum chinense and C. baccatum. In Proc. 17th Intern. Pepper Conf, ed. G McAvoy. Univ. Fla. IEAS Ext., p. 21. (abstract)
77. 77. Romer P, Hahn S, Jordan T, Strauss T, Bonas U, Lahaye T. 2007. Plant pathogen recognition mediated by promoter activation of the Bs3 resistance gene. Science 318:645-648 (Pubitemid 350014838)
78. Romero AM, Kousik CS, Ritchie DF. 1996. Characteristics of race 3 strains of bacterial spot pathogen isolated from pepper. In Proc. Natl. Pepper Conf 1996, ed. D Maynard, pp. 61-62. Citrus & Veg. Mag. Tampa, FL
79. Ronald PC, Staskawicz BJ. 1988. The avirulence gene avrBsl from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria encodes a 50-kD protein. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 5:191-198
80. 80. Rowell B, Jones RT, Nesmith W, Satanek A, Snyder JC. 2001. Bacterial spot resistance, yield, and quality of bell and specialty peppers. HortTechnology 11:648-654 (Pubitemid 32974465)
81. 81. Sabin F, Miller SA. 1996. Characterization of Ohio strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, causal agent of bacterial spot of pepper. Plant Dis. 80:773-778 (Pubitemid 126754650)
82. 82. Sahin F, Miller SA. 1998. Resistance in Capsicum pubescens to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria pepper race 6. Plant Dis. 82:794-799 (Pubitemid 28417775)
83. 83. Schornack S, Bellvora A, Gurlebeck D, Peart J, Ganal M, et al. 2004. The tomato resistance protein Bs4 is a predicted non-nuclear TIR-NB-LRR protein that mediates defense responses to severely ttuncated derivatives of the AvrBs4 and overexpressed AvrBs3. Plant J. 37:46-60 (Pubitemid 38078264)
84. 84. Schornack S, Meyer A, Romer P, Jordan T, Lahaye T. 2006. Gene-for-gene-mediated recognition of nuclear-targeted avrBs3-like bacterial effector proteins. J. Plant Physiol. 163:256-272 (Pubitemid 43112081)
85. 85. Schornack S, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Jones JB, Lahaye T. 2008. Characterization of AvrHah1, a novel AvrBs3 -like effector from Xanthomonas gardneri with virulence and avirulence activity. New Phytol. 179:546-556 (Pubitemid 351991429)
86. Scott W, Hutton, Hones JB, Francis DM, Miller SA. 2006. Resistance to bacterial spot race T4 and breeding for durable, broad spectrum resistance to other races. Tomato Genetics Coop. 56:33-36
87. Scott JW, Jones JB. 1989. Inheritance of resistance to foliar bacterial spot of tomato incited by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114:111-114
88. 88. Scott JW, Miller SA, Stall RE, Jones JB, Somodi GC, et al. 1997. Resistance to race T2 of the bacterial spot pathogen in tomato. HortScience 32:724-727 (Pubitemid 27439659)
89. Scott JW, Stall RE, Jones JB, Somodi GC. 1996. A single gene controls the hypersensitive response of Hawaii 7981 to race 3 of the bacterial spot pathogen. Tomato Genetic Coop. 46:16
90. 90. Somodi GC, Jones JB, Scott JW, Wang J-F, Stall RE. 1996. Relationship between the hypersensitive reaction and field resistance to tomato race 1 of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Dis. 80:1151-1154 (Pubitemid 26369237)
91. Sowell G Jr. 1960. Bacterial spot resistance of introduced peppers. Plant Dis. Reptr. 44:587-590
92. Sowell G Jr, Dempsey AH. 1977. Additional sources of resistance to bacterial spot of pepper. Plant Dis. Reptr. 61:684-686
93. Stall RE. 1981. Selection for components of horizontal resistance to bacterial spot of pepper. In Proc. Fifth Intern. Conf. on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, ed. JC Lozano, pp. 511-517 Cali, Columbia: CIAT. 640 pp.
94. 94. Stall RE, Beaulieu C, Egel D, Hodge NC, Leite RP, et al. 1994. Two genetically diverse groups of strains are included in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Int. J. Syst. Bacterial. 44:47-53 (Pubitemid 24023653)
95. Stall RE, Cook AA. 1966. Multiplication of Xanthomonas vesicatoria and lesion development in resistant and susceptible pepper. Phytopathology 56:1152-1154
96. Stall RE, Minsavage GV. 1996. Method for screening for bacterial spot resistance genes Bs1, Bs2, and Bs3 in a single pepper plant. In Proc. Natl. Pepper Conf 1996, ed. D Maynard, pp. 63-64. Citrm & Veg. Mag. Tampa, FL
97. Stall RE, Loschke DC, Jones JB. 1986. Linkage of copper resistance and avirulence loci on a selftransmissible plasmid in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Phytopathology 76:240-243
98. Stall RE, Thayer PL. 1962. Streptomycin resistance of the bacterial spot pathogen and control with stteptomycin. Plant Dis. Reptr. 45:389-392
99. Swanson J, Kearney B, Dahlbeck D, Staskawicz BJ. 1988. Cloned avirulence gene of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria complements spontaneous race-change mutants. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1:5-9
100. Swarup S, De Feyter R, Brlansky RH, Gabriel DW. 1991. A pathogenicity locus from Xanthomonas citri enables strains from several pathovars of X. campestris to form cankerlike lesions on cittus. Phytopathology 81:802-809
101. 101. Swords KM, Dahlbeck D, Kearney B, Roy M, Staskawicz BJ. 1996. Spontaneous and induced mutations in a single open reading frame alter both virulence and avirulence in Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria avrBs2. J. Bacteriol. 178:4661-4669 (Pubitemid 26262256)
102. Tai T, Dahlbeck D, Clark FT, Gajiwala P, Pasion R, Whalen MC, et al. 1999. Expression of the Bs2 pepper gene confers resistance to bacterial spot disease in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:14153-14158
103. Thayer PL, Stall RE. 1962. A survey of Xanthomonas vesicatoria resistance to stteptomycin. Fl. State Hort. Soc. 75:163-165
104. 104. Thieme F, Koebnik R, Bekel T, Berger C, Boch J, et al. 2005. Insights into genome plasticity and pathogenicity of the plant pathogenic bacterium Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria revealed by the complete genome sequence. J. Bacteriol. 187:7254-7266 (Pubitemid 41507782)
105. Timmer LW, Marois JJ, Achor D. 1987. Growth and survival of xanthomonads under conditions nonconductive to disease development. Phytopathology 77:1341-1345
106. 106. Tudor-Nelson S, Minsavage GV, Stall RE, Jones JB. 2003. Bacteriocin-like substances from tomato race 3 strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Phytopathology 93:1415-1421 (Pubitemid 37332225)
107. Wang J-F. 1992. Resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in tomato. PhD dissertation. Univ. Fla., Gainesville. 166 pp.
108. Wang J-F, Stall RE, Vallejos CE. 1994. Genetic analysis of a complex hypersensitive reaction to bacterial spot in tomato. Phytopathology 84:126-132
109. Wang J-F, Jones JB, ScottJW, Stall RE. 1994. Several genes in Lycopersicon esculentum control hypersensitivity to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Phytopathology 84:702-706
110. Whalen MC, Stall RE, Staskawicz BJ. 1988. Characterization of a gene from a tomato pathogen determining hypersensitive resistance in non-host species and genetic analysis of this resistance in bean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. . USA 85:6743-6747
111. Whalen MC, Wang J-F, Garland FM, Heiskell M, Dahlbeck D, et al. 1993. Avirulence gene avrRxv from Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria specifies resistance on tomato line Hawaii 7998. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 6:616-627
112. 112. Wichmann G, Bergelson J. 2004. Effector genes of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria promote transmission and enhance other fitness traits in the field. Genetics 166:693-706 (Pubitemid 38391735)
113. Wichmann G, Ritchie D, Kousik CS, Bergelson. 2005. Reduced genetic variation occurs among genes of the highly clonal plant pathogen Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria, including the effector gene avrBs2. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:2418-2432
114. 114. Yang W, Sacks EJ, Lewis Ivey ML, Miller SA, Francis DM. 2005. Resistance in Lycopersicon esculentum intraspecific crosses to race TT strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria causing bacterial spot of tomato. Phytopathology 95:519-527 (Pubitemid 40589233)
115. Yu ZH, Wang J-F, Stall RE, Vallejos CE. 1995. Genomic localization of tomato genes that control a hypersensitive reaction to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye. Genetics 141:675-682