Resistance to race T2 of the bacterial spot pathogen in tomato

HortScience

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 724-727

  Scott, J W ^a   Miller, S A ^b   Stall, R E ^c   Jones, J B ^a   Somodi, G C ^a   Barbosa, V ^d   Francis, D L ^b   Sahin, F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^d Estacao Experimental P Prudente   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Disease resistance; Lycopersicon esculentum; Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium; Plant breeding; Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON PIMPINELLIFOLIUM; XANTHOMONAS; XANTHOMONAS CAMPESTRIS PV. VESICATORIA;

EID: 0030870716     PISSN: 00185345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.32.4.724     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bouzar, H., J.B. Jones, R.E. Stall, N.C. Hodge, G.V. Minsavage, A.A. Benedict, and A.M. Alvarez. 1994. Physiological, chemical, serological, and pathogenic analyses of a worldwide collection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria strains. Phytopathology 84:663-671.
2. Cox, R.S. 1966. The role of bacterial spot in tomato production in south Florida. Plant Dis. Rptr. 50:699-700.
3. El-Morsy, G.A., G.C. Somodi, J.W. Scott, R.E. Stall, and J.B. Jones. 1994. Aggressiveness of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria tomato race 3 (T3) strains over tomato race 1 (T1) strains: Evidence for antagonism. Phytopathology 84:1094. (Abstr.)
4. Horsfall, J.G. and R.W. Barratt. 1945. An improved system for measuring plant disease. Phytopathology 36:655. (Abstr.)
5. Jones, J.B. and J.W. Scott. 1986. Hypersensitive response in tomato to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Dis. 70:337-339.
6. Jones, J.B., R.E. Stall, J.W. Scott, G.C. Somodi, H. Bouzar, and N.C. Hodge. 1995. A third tomato race of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Plant Dis. 79:395-398.
7. Nayudu, M.V. and J.C. Walker. 1960. Bacterial spot of tomato as influenced by temperature and by age and nutrition of the host. Phytopathology 50:360-364.
8. Pohronezny, Ken and R.B Volin. 1983. The effect of bacterial spot on yield and quality of fresh market tomatoes. HortScience 18:69-70.
9. Rouamba, A., H. Laterrot, and A. Moretti. 1988. A case of relation between resistances to Pseudomonas solanacearum and Verticillium pathotype 2. Rpt. Tomato Genet. Coop. 38:43-44.
10. Scott, J.W. and J.B. Jones. 1985. Evaluation of Lycopersicon sp. accessions for resistance to bacterial spot [Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Doidge) Dye]. Fla. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bul. 855.
11. Scott, J.W., J.B. Jones, and G. Cameron Somodi. 1991. Disease severity of tomato hybrids heterozygous or homozygous for resistance to bacterial spot: Commercial outlook. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 104:259-262.
12. Scott, J.W., J.B. Jones, G.C. Somodi, and R.E. Stall. 1995. Screening tomato accessions for resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, race T3. HortScience 30:579-581.
13. Wang, J-F. 1992. Resistance to Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria in tomato. PhD Diss., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville.
14. Wang, J-F., J.B. Jones, J.W. Scott, and R.E. Stall. 1990. A new race of the tomato group of strains of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Phytopathology 80:1070. (Abstr.)