Between critique and accommodation: Reflections on an EAP course for Masters of Architecture students

English for Specific Purposes

Volumn 20, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2001, Pages 439-458

  Swales, John M ^a   Barks, Debbie ^a   Ostermann, Ana Cristina ^a   Simpson, Rita C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0347081474     PISSN: 08894906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00020-5     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ackerman, J., & Oates, S. (1995). Image, text and power in architectural design and workplace writing. In A. Duin, & C. Hansen (Eds.), Multidisciplinary research in workplace writing settings: challenging the boundaries (pp. 81-121). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Agar, M. (1985). Institutional discourse. Text, 5, 147-168.
3. Ahrentzen, S., & Anthony, K. H. (1993). Sex, stars and studios: a look at the gendered educational practices in architecture. Journal of Architectural Education, 47, 11-29.
4. Anthony, K. (1987). Private reactions to public criticism: students, faculty, and practicing architects state their views on design juries in architectural education. Journal of Architectural Education, 40, 2-11.
5. Anthony, K. H. (1991a). Design juries on trial: the renaissance of the design studio. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
6. Anthony, K. H. (1991b). Juries on trial: design juries. Architectural Record, 179, 77-8 (July).
7. Argyris, C. (1976). Teaching and learning in design studios. In W. L. Porter, & M. Kilbridge (Eds.), Architectural education study (pp. 551-660). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
8. Barks, D. & Watts, P. (2001) Textual borrowing strategies for graduate student ESL writers. In D. Belcher & A. Hirvela (Eds.) Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading-writing connections, (pp. 246-267). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
9. Belcher, D. (1994). The apprenticeship approach to advanced academic literacy: graduate students and their mentors. English for Specific Purposes, 13, 23-34.
10. Benesch, S. (1996). Needs analysis and curriculum development in EAP: an example of a critical approach. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 723-738.
11. Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. Hermes, 19, 227-239.
12. Briggs, S. (1987). When course success varies from discourse success. English for Specific Purposes, 6, 153-156.
13. Casanave, C. (1992). The writing assignments and writing problems of doctoral students: faculty perceptions, pedagogical issues, and needed research. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 33-49.
14. Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals: European Union research grants. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 47-62.
15. Dinham, S. M. (1986). Architectural education: is jury criticism a valid technique? Architectural Record(November), 51-53.
16. Drew, P., & Heritage, J. (1992). Analyzing talk at work: an introduction. In P. Drew, & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 3-65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Fleming, J., Honour, H., & Pevsner, N. (1991). The Penguin dictionary of architecture (4th ed). London: Penguin Books.
18. Frederickson, M. P. (1990). Design juries: a study in lines of communication. Journal of Architectural Education, 43, 22-27.
19. Groat, L., & Ahrentzen, S. (1996). Reconceptualizing architectural education for a more diverse future: perceptions and visions of archiectural students. Journal of Architectural Education, 49, 166-183.
20. Gunnarsson, B.-L. (1997). The writing process from a sociolinguistic view point. Written Communication, 14, 139-188.
21. Hirvela, A. (1997). Disciplinary portfolios and EAP writing instruction. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 83-100.
22. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.
23. Jacoby, S. (1977). Rethinking EST: what can indigenous assessment tell us about the communication culture of science? Paper presented at the International Conference on Pragmatics and Language Learning, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
24. Jacoby, S. (1998). How can ESP practitioners tap into situated discourse research - and why should we? ESPNews-TESOL, 7(1), 9-10.
25. Johns, A. M. (1993). Too much on our plates: a response to Terry Santos' "Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL". Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 83-88.
26. Johns, A. M. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 181-190.
27. Luebs, M., Fredrickson, K. M., Hyon, S., & Samraj, B. (1998). John Swales as mentor: the view from the doctoral group. English for Specific Purposes, 17, 67-86.
28. Medway, P. (1996). Virtual and material buildings: construction and constructivism in architecture and writing. Written Communication, 13, 473-514.
29. Northcott, J. (2001). Towards an ethnography of the MBA classroom: a consideration of the role of interactive lecturing styles within the context of one MBA programme. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 15-37.
30. Ostermann, A. C. (1998a). Drawing on words and words on drawings: construction of identity and negotiation of expertise in design juries in the school of architecture. Paper presented at the AAAL98-American Association for Applied Linguistics Conference, Seattle.
31. Ostermann, A. C. (1998b). Ideological constraints in the construction of identity and negotiation of expertise in design juries in the school of architecture. Paper presented at the 6th InPra - International Pragmatics Conference, Reims, France.
32. Pennycook, A. (1994). Critical pedagogical approaches to research. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 690-693.
33. Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 16, 253-269.
34. Poos, D. & Simpson R. C. (in press). Cross-disciplinary comparisons of hedging: some findings from the Michigan Corpus of Academic spoken English. In D. Biber et al. (Eds.) Using corpora for social and educational purposes.
35. Prior, P. (1995). Redefining the task: an ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher, & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic writing in a second language: essays on research and pedagogy (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Santos, T. (1992). Ideology in composition: L1 and ESL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 1-15.
37. Scott, M. (1999). Wordsmith tools. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Seliman, S. (1996). The genre of engineering presentations: insights for innovations and future directions in ESP/EST. ESP Malaysia, 4, 29-39.
39. Sung, C-I. (2000). Investigating rounded academic success: the influence of English language proficiency, academic performance and socioacademic interaction for Taiwanese doctoral students in the United States. Ph.D dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
40. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today's research world: a writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
42. Tracy, K. (1997). Colloquium: dilemmas of academic discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
43. Vandrick, S. (1995). Privileged ESL university students. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 375-381.
44. Wodak, R. (1995). Critical linguistics and the study of institutional communication. In P. Stevenson (Ed.), The German language and the real world (pp. 205-230). Oxford: Clarendon Press.