Fresh cut mango fruits: Evaluation of edible coatings

Acta Horticulturae

Volumn 820, Issue , 2009, Pages 761-767

  Ducamp Collin, M N ^a   Reynes, M ^a   Lebrun, M ^a   Freire, M ^b  

^a CIRAD   (France)

^b EMBRAPA AGROINDÚSTRIA DE ALIMENTOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Chitosan; Coatings; Edible films; Mangifera indica L. fresh cut

Indexed keywords

MANGIFERA INDICA; SOLANUM TUBEROSUM;

EID: 70350105395     PISSN: 05677572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2009.820.95     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Abe, K. and Watada, A.E. 1991. Ethylene absorbent to maintain quality of lightly processed fruits and vegetables. J. Food Sci. 56:1589-1592.
2. Allong, R., Wickham, L.D. and Mohammed, M. 2000. The effect of cultivar, fruit ripeness, storage temperature and duration on quality of fresh-cut mango. Acta Hort. 509, p. 487-494.
3. Beaulieu, J.C. and Lea, J.M. 2003. Volatile and quality changes in fresh-cut mangos prepared from firm-ripe and soft-ripe fruit, stored in clamshell containers and passiveMAP. Postharvest Biology and Technology 30: 15-28.
4. Brecht, J.K. 1995. Physiology of lightly processed fruits and vegetables. HortSci. 30:18-22.
5. Du, J., Gemma, H. and Iwahori, S. 1997. Effect of Chitosan Coating on the Storage of Peach, Japanese Pear and Kiwifruit. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 66: 15-22.
6. El Ghaouth, A., Arul, J. and Ponnampalam, R. 1991a. Use of Chitosan Coating to Reduce Water Loss and Maintain Quality of Cucumber and Bell Pepper Fruits. J. Food Proc. Preserv. 15: 359-368.
7. El Ghaouth, A., Arul, J., Ponnampalam, R. and Boulet, M. 1991b. Chitosan Coating Effect on Storability and Quality of Fresh Strawberries. J. Food Sci. 56: 1618-1620.
8. El Ghaouth, A., Ponnampalam, R., Castaigne, F. and Arul, J. 1992. Chitosan coating to extend the storage life of tomatoes. Hortsci. 27: 1016-1018.
9. Gorny, J.R. 2001. A summary of CA and MA requirements and recommendations for fresh-cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables. p. 95-145. Postharvest Hort. Series No. 22A, Univ. California, Davis.
10. Huxsoll, C.C., Bolin, H.R. and King Jr, A.D. 1989. Physiological changes and treatments for lightly processed fruits and vegetables. In: J.J. Jen (ed.), Quality factors of fruits and vegetables: Chemistry and technology" ACS Symposium Series 405:203-215.
11. Kader, A.A., and Ben-Yehoshua, S. 2000. Effects of superatmospheric oxygen levels on postharvest physiology and quality of fresh fruits and vegetables, Postharvest Biol. Tech. 20:1-13.
12. King, A.D., and Bolin, H.R. 1989. Physiological and microbiological storage stability of minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Food Tech. 43(2):132-135; 139.
13. Kittur, F.S., Kumar, K.R. and Tharanathan, R.N. 1998. Functional Packaging Properties of Chitosan Films. Z Lesbensm. Unters Forsch. A. 206: 44-47.
14. Limbanyen, A., Brecht, J.K., Sargent, S.A. and Bartz, J.A. 1998. Fresh-cut mango fruit slices. HortSci. 33:457.
15. Lizada, C. 1993. Mango. p. 255-272. In: G.B. Seymour, J.E. Taylor and G.A. Tucker (eds.), Biochemistry of fruit ripening, , Chapman and Hall, London.
16. Miller, K.S., and Krochta, J.M. 1997. Oxygen and aroma barrier properties of edible films: A review Trends Food Sci. Tech. 8:228-237.
17. Purwadaria, H.K. and Wuryani, S. 2000. Respiration model for edible coated minimally processed mango. Acta Hort. 509: 531-542.
18. Rattanapanone, N. and Watada, A.E. 2000. Respiration rate and respiratory quotient of fresh-cut mango (Mangifera indica L.) in low oxygen atmosphere. Acta Hort. 509: 471-478.
19. Rolle, R.S. and Chism, G.W. III. 1987. Physiological consequences of minimally processed fruits and vegetables. J. Food Qual. 10:157-177.
20. Saltveit, M.E. 1997. Physical and physiological changes in minimally processed fruits and vegetables. p. 205-220. In: F.A. Tomás- Barberán and R.J. Robins (eds.), Phytochemistry of fruit and vegetables. Oxford University Press, London.
21. Saltveit, M.E. 2002. Fresh-cut vegetables. p. 691-712. In: J.A. Bartz and J.K. Brecht (eds.), Postharvest physiology and pathology of vegetables. Marcel Dekker, New York.
22. Talcott, S.T. and Howard, L.R. 1999. Chemical and sensory quality of processed carrot puree as influenced by stress-induced phenolic compounds. J. Agr. Food Chem. 47:1362-1366.
23. Varoquaux, P. and Wiley, R.C. 1994. Biological and biochemical changes in minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. p. 226-268. In: R.C. Wiley (ed.), Minimally processed refrigerated fruits and vegetables. Chapman & Hall, New York-London.
24. Varoquaux, P., Gouble, B., Ducamp, M.N. and Self, G. 2002. Procedure to optimize modified atmosphere packaging for fruit. Fruits 57(5-6): 313-322.
25. Watada, A.E., Ko, N.P. and Minott, D.A. 1996. Factors affecting quality of fresh-cut horticultural products. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 9:115-125.
26. Watada, A.E., and Qi, L. 1999. Quality of fresh-cut produce. Postharvest Biol. Tech. 15:201-205.
27. Yahia, E. and Vasquez, L. 1993. Responses of mango to insecticidal oxygen and carbon dioxide atmospheres. Food Sci. Tech. (Lebens. Wiss. Technol.), 26: 42-48.