Te role of role-play: Managing activity ambiguities in simulated doctor consultation in medical education

Communication and Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 83-93

  Thomassen, Gøril ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Activity type; Communication skills; Framing; Hy bridity; Medical education; Simulated consultation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; ROLE PLAYING; VIDEORECORDING;

COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; ROLE PLAYING; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 70350068044     PISSN: 16121783     EISSN: 16133625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cam.v6i1.83     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aspegren, K. (1999). BEME Guide No.2: teaching and learning communication skills in medicine - a review with quality grading of articles. Medical Teacher 21 (6): 563-570. doi:10.1080/01421599978979
2. Aspegren, K. Lønberg-Madsen, P. (2005). Which basic skills in medicine are learnt spontaneously and which need to be taught and learned? Medical Teacher 27 (6): 539-543. doi:10.1080/01421590500136501 (Pubitemid 41600722)
3. Bearman, M., Cesnik, B. and Liddell, M. (2001). Random comparison of 'virtual patient' models in the context of teaching clinical communication skills. Medical Education 35 (9): 824-832. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00999.x (Pubitemid 34212143)
4. Bradley, P. (2006). The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education 40 (3): 254-262. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006. 02394.x
5. Cegala, D. J. and Broz, S. L. (2002). Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Medical Education 36 (11): 1004-1016. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01331.x (Pubitemid 35340935)
6. Clark, H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dammers, J., Spencer, J. and Tomas, M. (2001). Using real patients in problem-based learning: students' comments on the value of using real, as opposed to paper cases, in problem-based learning module in general practice. Medical Education 35 (1): 27-34. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2001.00841.x (Pubitemid 32055613)
8. Drew, P. (1998). An exercise in the comparative analysis of talk-in-interaction in different (institutional) settings: the case of 'formulations'. In, H. Lehti-Eklund (ed.) Samtalsstudier 29-42. Department of Nordic Language and Nordic Literature: University of Helsingfors.
9. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
11. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Heritage, J. and Maynard, D. W. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annual Review of Sociology 32: 351-374. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.082905.093959 (Pubitemid 44474125)
13. Kurtz, S., Silverman, J. and Draper, J. (2005). Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine (second edition). Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.
14. Levinson, S. (1992). Activity types and language. In P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds.) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings 66-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Linell, P. and Tunqvist, D. P. (2003). Moving in and out of framings: Activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project. Journal of Pragmatics 35 (3): 409-434. doi:10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00143- 1 (Pubitemid 36184958)
16. Lowe, M., Kerridge, I., McPhee, J and Hart, C. (2008). Do patients have an obligation to participate in student teaching? Medical Education 42 (3): 237-241. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02948.x (Pubitemid 351230166)
17. Maguire, P. and Pitceathly, C. (2002). Key communication skills and how to acquire them. British Medical Journal 325 (7366): 697-700. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7366.697
18. McHugh, P. (1968). Defining the Situation: The Organization of Meaning in Social Interaction. Indianapolis, IN: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.
19. Pendleton, D., Schofield, T., Tate, T. and Havelock, P. (1984). The Consultation: An Approach to Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Peräkylä, A. and Vehvilainen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the stocks of interactional professional knowledge. Discourse & Society 14 (6): 727-750. doi: 10.1177/09579265030146003 (Pubitemid 37421913)
21. Roberts, C., Wass, V., Jones, R., Sarangi, S. and Gillett, A. (2003). A discourse analysis study of 'good' and 'poor' communication in OSCE: a proposed new framework for teaching students. Medical Education 37 (3): 192-201. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01443.x (Pubitemid 36359667)
22. Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (2005). Teme-oriented discourse analysis of medical encounters. Medical Education 39 (6): 632-640. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929. 2005.02171.x (Pubitemid 40776351)
23. Roter, D. L. and Larson, S. (2002). The Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interaction. Patient Education and Counselling 46 (4): 243-251. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00012-5 (Pubitemid 34258047)
24. Roter, D. L, Larson, S., Shinitzky, H., Chernoff, R., Serwint, JR., Adamo, G. and Wissow, L. (2004). Use of an innovative feedback technique to enhance communication skills training. Medical Education 38 (2): 145-157. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01754.x (Pubitemid 38299669)
25. Sandvik, M., Eide, H., Lind, M., Graugaard, P. K., Torper, J. and Finset, A. (2002). Analyzing medical dialogues: strength and weakness of Roters' interaction analysis system (RIAS). Patient Education and Counselling 46 (4): 235-241. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00014-9 (Pubitemid 34258046)
26. Sarangi, S. (2000). Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counselling. In S. Sarangi and M. Coulthard (eds) Discourse and Social Life 1-28. London, New York: Longman.
27. Sarangi, S. (2001) Interactional hybridity in gatekeeping discourse. In S. Cigada, S. Gilardoni and M. Matthey (eds) Communicare in Ambiente Professionale Plurilingue 47-71. Lugano: Universita della Svizzera Italiana.
28. Sarangi, S. (2005). The conditions and consequences of professional discourse studies. Journal of Applied Linguistics 2 (3): 371-394.
29. Sarangi, S. (in press). Practising discourse analysis in healthcare settings. In I. Bourgeault, R. Devries, and R. Dingwall (eds) Qualitative Methods in Health Research, London: Sage.
30. Seale, C., Butler, C., Hutchby, I., Kinnersley, P. and Rollnick, S. (2007). Negotiating frame ambiguity: A study of simulated encounters in medical education. Communication & Medicine 4 (2): 177-187. doi:10.1515/CAM. 2007.021 (Pubitemid 350223108)
31. Silverman, J., Kurtz, S. and Draper, J. (2005). Skills for Communicating with Patients. Abingdon, Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press.
32. Skelton, J. R. (2005). Everything you were afraid to ask about communication skills. British Journal of General Practice 55 (510): 40-46.
33. Stillman, P. L. (1980). Arizona clinical interview medical rating scale. Medical Teacher 2 (5): 248-251. doi: 10.3109/01421598009081200
34. Tomassen, G. (2005). Den flerbunnete treningssamtalen: En studie av samtaler mellom pasient og student fra sykepleieog medisinerutdanning [Te Double-Barreled Training Talk: A Study of Talks between Patients and Students from Nurse and Physician Education]. Un-published doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Technology and Science: Trondheim.
35. Wynn, R. (1999). Provider-Patient Interaction. Kris-tiansand: Høyskoleforlaget.