Moving in and out of framings: Activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 409-434

  Linell, Per ^a   Thunqvist, Daniel Persson ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Activity; Context; Conversation analysis; Frame; Hybridity; Job interview; Simulation; Unemployment; Youth

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037363870     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00143-1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adelswärd, Viveka, 1988. Styles of success: on impression management as collaborative action in job interviews. (Linkop̈ing Studies in Arts and Science, 23). Linköping: Department of Theme Research.
2. Adelswärd, Viveka, 1989. Laughter and dialogue: the social significance of laughter in institutional discourse. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12, 107-136.
3. Allwood, Jens, 1976. Linguistic Communication as Action and Cooperation. (Gothenburg Monographs in Linguistics, 2). Department of Linguistics, Göteborg.
4. Allwood, Jens, 2000. An activity-based approach to pragmatics. In: Bunt, H., Black, B. (Eds.), Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue: Studies in Computational Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 47-80.
5. Auer, Peter, 1998. Learning how to play the game: an investigation of role-played job interviews in East Germany. Text 18, l7-38.
6. Bateson, Gregory, 1972. Steps to an ecology of mind. Ballantine, New York.
7. Billig, Michael, 1999. Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in Conversation Analysis. Discourse and Society 10 543-558.
8. Cedersund, Elisabet, 1992. Talk, text and institutional order: a study of communication in social welfare bureaucracies. (Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 78). Department of Theme Research, Linköping.
9. Cicourel, Aaron, 1981. Notes on the integration of micro- and macro-levels of analysis. In: Knorr-Cetina, K., Cicourel, A. (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and macro-sociologies. Routledge and Kegan, Boston Paul, pp. 51-80.
10. Clark, Herbert H., 1996. Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Coupland, Justine, Robinson, Jeffrey D., Coupland, Nikolas, 1994. Frame negotiation in doctor-elderly patient consultations. Discourse and Society 5, 89-124.
12. Duranti, Alessandro, Goodwin, Charles (Eds.), 1992. Rethinking Context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Engestrom, Yrjö, 2000. From individual action to collective activity and back: developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In: Lu., P., Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J. (Eds.), Workplace Studies: Recovering Work Practice and Informing System Design. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 150-166.
14. Fairclough, Norman, 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Cambridge.
15. Goffman, Erving, 1974. Frame Analysis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
16. Goffman, Erving, 1981. Forms of Talk. Blackwell, Oxford.
17. Gonäs, Lena, 1989. En fråga om kön: Kvinnor och män i Strukturomvandlingens Spår. ("A Question of Gender: Women and Men in the Wake of Structural Change"). Arbetslivscentrum, Stockholm.
18. Goodwin, Charles, 2000. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32, 1489-1522.
19. Gumperz, John, 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
20. Heritage, John, 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Polity Press, Cambridge.
21. Hester, Stephen, Francis, David, 2000. Ethnomethodology, conversational analysis and 'institutional talk'. Text 20, 391-413.
22. Layder, Derek, 1994. Understanding Social Theory. Sage, London.
23. Levinson, Stephen, 1979. Activity types and language. Linguistics 17, 365-399 Reprinted in Drew P., Heritage, J. Eds., Talk at Work, pp. 66-100. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
24. Linell, Per, 1998a. Approaching Dialogue: Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
25. Linell, Per, 1998b. Discourse across boundaries: on recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse. Text 18, 143-157.
26. Linell, Per, Fredin, Erik, 1995. Negotiating terms in social welfare office talk. In: Firth, A. (Ed.), Negotiation in Workplaces: Discourse and Interactional Perspectives. Pergamon, New York, pp. 299-318.
27. MacLachlan, Gail, Reid, Ian, 1994. Framing and Interpretation. Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Victoria.
28. Mäkitalo, Åsa, 2002. Categorizing Work: Knowing, arguing, and social dilemmas in vocational guidance (Göteborg Studies in Educational Sciences, 177). Göteborg.
29. Mäkitalo, Åsa, Säljö, Roger, 2002. Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: categories as situated practices. Text 22, 57-82.
30. Persson Thunqvist, Daniel, 2001. Kommunala utvecklingsprojekt som kommunikativa verksamheter ("Municipal Development Projects as Communicative Activities"). Ms. Department of Communication Studies, Linköping.
31. Rogoff, Barbara, Lave, Jean, 1984. Everyday Cognition: its Development in Social Context. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
32. Sarangi, Srikant, 2000. Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: the case of genetic counseling. In: Sarangi, S., Coulthard, M. (Eds.), Discourse and social life. Longman, Harlow, pp. 1-27.
33. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1991. Reflections on talk and social structure. In: Boden, D., Zimmerman, D. (Eds.), Talk and Social Structure: Studies in Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. Polity Press, Oxford, pp. 44-70.
34. Schegloff, Emanuel A., 1992. In another context. Duranti, A., Goodwin, C. (Eds.), Rethinking Context. pp. 191-227.
35. Scheglo., Emanuel A., 1997. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society 8, 165-187.
36. Scheglo., Emanuel A., 1999. 'Schegloff's texts' as 'Billig's data': a critical reply. Discourse and Society 10, 558-572.
37. Schutz, Alfred, 1962. Collected papers, vol. 1. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.
38. Sennett, Richard, 1998. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. W.W. Norton, New York.
39. Tannen, Deborah, Wallat, Cynthia, 1999. Interactive frames and knowledge schemas in interaction: examples from a medical examination/interview. In: Jaworski, A., Coupland, A.N. (Eds.), The Discourse Reader. [1987]Routledge, London, pp. 346-366. [Originally published in Social Psychology Quarterly 50: 205-216.].
40. Tracy, Karen, 1998. Analyzing context: framing the discussion.. Research on Language and Social Interaction 31, 1-28.
41. Wetherell, Margaret, 1998. Positioning and interpretative repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society 9, 387-412.
42. Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1958. Philosophical Investigations (G.E.M. Anscombe, trans.), second ed.. Blackwell, Oxford.
43. Zimmerman, Don, 1998. Identity, context and interaction. In: Antaki, C., Widdicombe, S. (Eds.), Identities in Talk. Sage, London, pp. 87-106.