Marsh Tit Poecile palustris territories in a British broad-leaved wood

Ibis

Volumn 148, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 744-752

  Broughton, Richard K ^a   Hinsley, Shelley A ^a   Bellamy, Paul E ^a   Hill, Ross A ^a   Rothery, Peter ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREEDING POPULATION; BROAD-LEAVED FOREST; MAPPING; PASSERINE; SPECIES RICHNESS; TERRITORY;

CAMBRIDGESHIRE; ENGLAND; EURASIA; EUROPE; MONKS WOOD; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

PARUS PALUSTRIS;

EID: 33750184841     PISSN: 00191019     EISSN: 1474919X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00583.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Baillie, S.R., Marchant, J.H., Crick, H.Q.P., Noble, D.G., Balmer, D.E., Beaven, L.P., Coombes, R.H., Downie, I.S., Freeman, S.N., Joys, A.C., Leech, D.I., Raven, M.J., Robinson, R.A. & Thewlis, R.M. 2005. Breeding Birds in the Wider Countryside: Their Conservation Status 2004. BTO Research Report no. 385. Thetford: BTO, http://www.bto.org/birdtrends.
2. van den Berg, L.J.L., Bullock, J.M., Clarke, R.T., Langston, R.H.W. & Rose, R.J. 2001. Territory selection by the Dartford Warbler (Sylvia undata) in Dorset, England: the role of vegetation type, habitat fragmentation and population size. Biol. Conserv. 101: 217-228.
3. Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A. & Mustoe, S.H. 2000. Bird Census Techniques, 2nd edn. London: Academic Press.
4. Bradbury, R.B., Hill, R.A., Mason, D.C., Hinsley, S.A., Wilson, J.D., Balzter, H., Anderson, G.Q.A., Whittingham, M.J., Davenport, I.J. & Bellamy, P.E. 2005. Modelling relationships between birds and vegetation structure using airborne LiDAR data: a review with case studies from agricultural and woodland environments. Ibis 147: 443-452.
5. Broughton, R.K. 2006. An example of polygyny in the Marsh Tit. Br. Birds 99: 211-212.
6. Cramp, S. & Perrins, C.M. (eds) 1993. The Birds of the Western Palearctic, Vol. 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Fuller, R.J. 1995. Bird Life of Woodland and Forest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Fuller, R.J., Noble, D.G., Smith, K.W. & Vanhinsbergh, D. 2005. Recent declines in populations of woodland birds in Britain: a review of possible causes. Br. Birds 98: 116-143.
9. Gardener, C. & Sparks, T. (eds) 2005. Ten years of change: woodland research at Monks Wood NNR, 1993-2003. Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Symposium. English Nature Research Report 613.
10. Gaveau, D.L.A. & Hill, R.A. 2003. Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data. Can. J. Rem. Sens. 29: 650-657.
11. Glue, D.E. 1973. Breeding birds of a New Forest valley. Br. Birds 66: 461-472.
12. Goławski, A. & Dombrowski, A. 2002. Habitat use of Yellow-hammers Emberiza citrinella, Ortolan Buntings E. hortulana, and Corn Buntings Miliaria calandra in farmland of east-central Poland. Orn. Fenn. 79: 164-172.
13. Gregory, R.D., Wilkinson, N.I., Noble, D.G., Robinson, J., Brown, A.F., Hughes, J., Procter, D., Gibbons, D.W. & Galbraith, C.A. 2002. The population status of birds in the United Kingdom, Channel Islands and Isle of Man: an analysis of conservation concern 2002-2007. Br. Birds 95: 410-448.
14. Haftorn, S. 1997. One Norwegian territory of the Marsh Tit Parus palustris during 35 years. Ibis 139: 379-381.
15. Hill, R.A., Gaveau, D.L.A. & Spendlove, M. 2002. Accuracy issues in the assessment of deciduous woodland canopy height by airborne laser scanning: a case study. In Proceedings of Forestsat: Operational Tools in Forestry Using Remote Sensing Technology, 5-9 August 2002. Edinburgh: Heriot Watt University [CD-ROM].
16. Hill, R.A., Hinsley, S.A., Bellamy, P.E. & Balzter, H. 2003. Ecological applications of airborne laser scanner data: modelling woodland bird habitats. In Proceedings of Scandlaser: Scientific Workshop on Airborne Laser Scanning of Forests, 3-4 September 2003. Umeå, Sweden.
17. Hill, R.A. & Thomson, A.G. 2005. Mapping woodland species composition and structure using airborne spectral and LiDAR data. Int. J. Rem. Sens. 26: 3763-3779.
18. Hinde, R.A. 1952. The behaviour of the Great Tit (Parus major) and some other related species. Behaviour 2 (Suppl.): 1-201.
19. Hinsley, S.A., Bellamy, P.E. & Wyllie, I. 2005. The Monks Wood avifauna. In Gardener, C. & Sparks, T. (eds) Ten Years of Change: Woodland Research at Monks Wood NNR, 1993-2003. Proceedings of the 50th Anniversary Symposium. English Nature Research Report 613.
20. Hinsley, S.A., Hill, R.A., Gaveau, D.L.A. & Bellamy, P.E. 2002. Quantifying woodland structure and habitat quality for birds using airborne laser scanning. Funct. Ecol. 16: 851-857.
21. Hodder, K.H., Kenward, R.E., Walls, S.S. & Clarke, R.T. 1998. Estimating core ranges: a comparison of techniques using the Common Buzzard (Buteo buteo). J. Raptor Res. 32: 82-89.
22. King, J.R. & Muddeman, J.L. 1995. Ageing and sexing Marsh Tits Parus palustris. Ring. Migr. 16: 172-177.
23. Lefsky, M.A., Cohen, W.B., Parker, G.G. & Harding, D.J. 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 52: 19-30.
24. Ludescher, F.B. 1973. Sumpfmeise (Parus p. palustris) und Weidenmeise (P. montanus salicarius Br.) als sympatrische Zwillingsgarten. J. Ornithol. 114: 3-56.
25. Manly, B.F.J. 1991. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. London: Chapman & Hall.
26. Mennill, D.J., Ramsay, S.M., Boag, P.T. & Ratcliffe, L.M. 2004. Patterns of extrapair mating in relation to male dominance status and female next placement in black-capped chickadees. Behav. Ecol. 15: 757-765.
27. Morley, A. 1953. Field observations on the biology of the Marsh Tit. Br. Birds 46: 32-346.
28. Nilsson, J.A. 1989. Causes and consequences of natal dispersal in the marsh tit, Parus palustris. J. Anim. Ecol. 58: 619-636.
29. Nilsson, J.A. & Smith, H.G. 1985. Early fledgling mortality and the timing of juvenile dispersal in the Marsh Tit Parus palustris. Orn. Scand. 16: 293-298.
30. Nilsson, J.A. & Smith, H.G. 1988. Effects of dispersal date on winter flock establishment and social dominance in marsh tits Parus palustris. J. Anim. Ecol. 57: 917-928.
31. Patenaude, G., Hill, R.A., Milne, R., Gaveau, D.L.A., Briggs, B.B.J. & Dawson, T.P. 2004. Quantifying forest above ground carbon content using LiDAR remote sensing. Rem. Sens. Env. 93: 368-380.
32. Perrins, C.M. 1979. British Tits. London: Collins.
33. Perrins, C.M. 2003. The status of Marsh and Willow Tits in the UK. Br. Birds 96: 418-426.
34. Sellers, R.M. 2002. Marsh Tit Parus palustris. In Wernham, C., Toms, M., Marchant, J., Clark, J., Siriwardena, G. & Baillie, S. (eds) The Migration Atlas: Movements of the Birds of Britain and Ireland: 592-593. London: Christopher Helm.
35. Siriwardena, G.M. 2001. Why are 'brown tits' declining? BTO News 235: 23-24.
36. Siriwardena, G.M. 2004. Possible roles of habitat, competition and avian nest predation in the decline of the Willow Tit Parus montanus in Britain. Bird Study 51: 193-202.
37. Southern, H.N. & Morley, A. 1950. Marsh-Tit territories over six years. Br. Birds 43: 33-47.
38. Steele, R.C. & Welch, R.C. (eds) 1973. Monks Wood, a Nature Reserve Record. Huntingdon: Natural Environment Research Council.
39. Svensson, L. 1992. Identification Guide to European Passerines. Stockholm: Svensson.
40. Tomiałojć, L. & Wesołowski, T. 2004. Diversity of the Bialowie&a Forest avifauna in space and time. J. Ornithol. 145: 81-92.
41. Tomiałojć, L., Wesołowski, T. & Walankiewicz, W. 1984. Breeding bird community of a primeval temperate forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Acta Orn. 20: 241-310.
42. Tye, A. 1992. Assessment of territory quality and its effects on breeding success in a migrant passerine, the Wheatear Oenanthe oenanthe. Ibis 134: 273-285.
43. Wesołowski, T. 1996. Natural nest sites of Marsh Tit in a primaeval forest (Białowieża National Park, Poland). Vogelwarte 38: 235-249.
44. Wesołowski, T. 1998. Timing and synchronisation of breeding in a Parus palustris population from a primaeval forest. Ardea 86: 89-100.