Snag density and use by cavity-nesting birds in managed stands of the Black Hills National Forest

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 214, Issue 1-3, 2005, Pages 40-52

  Spiering, David J ^a,b   Knight, Richard L ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Black Hills; Cavity nesting birds; Managed forests; Pinus ponderosa; Ponderosa pine; Snags

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DATA ACQUISITION; SURVEYS;

CAVITY-NESTING BIRDS; SNAG DENSITY; SNAG VARIABLES;

FORESTRY;

BIRD; HABITAT USE; SNAG;

BIRDS; FORESTRY; PINUS PONDEROSA;

BLACK HILLS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

AVES; PARUS ATRICAPILLUS; PICOIDES VILLOSUS; PINUS PONDEROSA; POECILE ATRICAPILLUS; SITTA CANADENSIS;

EID: 21444438480     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.054     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. S.H. Anderson, and B.J. Crompton The effects of shelterwood logging on bird community composition in the Black Hills, Wyoming For. Sci. 48 2002 365 372
2. Anderson, T., 2003. Conservation assessment of the woodpeckers in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota and Wyoming. USDA For. Serv., Black Hills National Forest, Custer, SD.
3. Balda, R.P., 1975. The relationship of secondary cavity-nesters to snag densities in western coniferous forests. USDA For. Serv. Wildlife Habitat Tech. Bull. No. 1, Albuquerque, NM.
4. J.J. Ball, and P.R. Schaefer Case no. 1: one hundred years of forest management J. For. 98 2000 4 10
5. S.T. Buckland, D.R. Anderson, K.P. Burnham, J.L. Laake, D.L. Borchers, and L. Thomas Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations 2001 Oxford University Press New York, NY
6. K.P. Burnham, and D.R. Anderson Model Selection and Multimodel-inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach 2nd ed. 2002 Springer-Verlag New York, NY
7. R.F. Buttery, and B.C. Gillam Forested ecosystems R.L. Hoover D.L. Wills Managing Forested Lands for Wildlife. Colorado Division of Wildlife in cooperation with USDA For. Serv. 1987 USDA For. Serv., Rocky Mountain Region Denver, CO
8. M. Cary Birds of the Black Hills Auk 18 1901 231 238
9. Cunningham, J.B., Balda, R.B., Gaud, W.S., 1980. Selection and use of snags by secondary cavity-nesting birds of the ponderosa pine forest. USDA For. Serv. Research Paper RM-222. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
10. Davis, J.W., 1983. Snags are for wildlife. In: Davis, J.W., Goodwin, G.A., Ockenfels, R.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Symposium on Snag Habitat Management. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-99, Flagstaff, AZ, pp. 4-9.
11. J.G. Dickson, R.N. Conner, and H. Williamson Snag retention increase bird use of a clear-cut J. Wildlife Manage. 47 1983 799 804
12. J.L. Ganey Snag density and composition of snag populations on two National Forests in northern Arizona For. Ecol. Manage. 117 1999 169 178
13. H.S. Graves The Black Hills Forest Reserve Proceedings of the 19th Annual Report of the Survey, 1897-1898. Part V. Forest Reserves Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC 1899 67 164
14. Hoffman, G.R., Alexander, R.R., 1987. Forest vegetation of the Black Hills National Forest of South Dakota and Wyoming: a habitat type classification. USDA For. Serv. Research Paper RM-276. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
15. D.W. Hosmer, and S. Lemeshow Applied Logistic Regression 2nd ed. 2000 Wiley New York
16. L. Imbeau, and A. Desrochers Foraging ecology and use of drumming trees by three-toed woodpeckers J. Wildlife Manage. 66 2000 222 231
17. Lentile, L., Smith, F.W., Shepperd, W., 2000. Final Report-Snag populations of the Black Hills National Forest. USDA For. Serv., Black Hills National Forest, Custer, SD.
18. Ludlow, W., 1875. Report of a reconnaissance of the Black Hills of Dakota, made the summer of 1874, Washington Government Printing Office.
19. R.W. Mannan, E.C. Meslow, and H.M. Wright Use of snags by birds in Douglas-fir forests, western Oregon J. Wildlife Manage. 44 1980 787 797
20. B.R. McClelland, and S.S. Frissell Identifying forest snags useful for hole-nesting birds J. For. 73 1975 414 417
21. B.R. McClelland, S.S. Frissell, W.C. Fischer, and C.H. Halvorson Habitat management for hole-nesting birds in forests of western larch and Douglas-fir J. For. 77 1979 480 483
22. P. McCullagh, and J.A. Nelder Generalized Linear Models 2nd ed. 1989 Chapman & Hall New York, NY
23. T.R. Mills, M.A. Rumble, and L.D. Flake Habitat of birds in ponderosa pine and aspen/birch forest in the Black Hills, South Dakota J. Field Ornith. 71 2000 187 384
24. Mills, T.R., Rumble, M.A., Flake, L.D., 2000b. Optimum timeframes for detecting songbird vocalizations in the Black Hills. USDA For. Serv. Research Paper RMRS-RP-21. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.
25. Mohren, S.R., 2002. Habitat evaluation and density estimates for the black-backed woodpecker (Picoides arcticus) and northern three-toed woodpecker (Picoides tridactylus) in the Black Hills National Forest. Thesis. University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY.
26. Panjabi, A., 2001. Monitoring the birds of the Black Hills: year 1. Annual report submitted to Black Hills National Forest. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO.
27. Panjabi, A., 2003. Monitoring the birds of the Black Hills: year 2. Annual report submitted to the Black Hills National Forest. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO.
28. Panjabi, A., 2004. Monitoring the birds of the Black Hills: year 3. Annual report submitted to the Black Hills National Forest. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO.
29. Parrish, J.B., Herman, D.J., Reyher, D.J., 1996. A century of change in the Black Hills forest and riparian ecosystems. USDA For. Serv., South Dakota Agriculture Experiment Station B 722, South Dakota State Univeristy, Brooking, SD.
30. M.G. Raphael, and M. White Use of snags by cavity-nesting birds in the Sierra Nevada Wildlife Monogr. 86 1984 1 66
31. R.T. Reynolds, J.M. Scott, and R.A. Nussbaum A variable circular-plot method for estimating bird numbers Condor 82 1980 309 313
32. Reynolds, R.T., Linkhart, B.D., Jeanson. J., 1985. Characteristics of snags and trees containing cavities in a Colorado conifer forest. USDA For. Serv. Research Note RM-455. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, CO.
33. S.S. Rosenstock, D.R. Anderson, K.M. Giesen, T. Leukering, and M.F. Carter Landbird counting techniques: current practices and an alternative Auk 119 2002 46 53
34. SAS SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 8.2 2001 SAS Institute Cary, NC
35. L.A. Schreiber, and D.S. deCalesta The relationship between cavity-nesting birds and snags on clearcuts in western Oregon For. Ecol. Manage. 50 1992 299 316
36. Scott, V.E., Evens, K.E., Patton, D.R., Stone, C.P., 1977. Cavity-nesting birds of North American forests. USDA For. Serv. Agricultural Handbook No. 511.
37. V.E. Scott Characteristics of ponderosa pine snags used by cavity-nesting birds in Arizona J. For. 76 1978 26 28
38. V.E. Scott Bird response to snag removal in ponderosa pine J. For. 77 1979 26 28
39. Shepperd, W.D., Battaglia, M.A., 2002. Ecology, silviculture, and management of Black Hills ponderosa pine. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Report RMRS-GTR-97. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO.
40. South Dakota Ornithologists' Union The Birds of South Dakota 2nd ed. 1991 The Union Aberdeen, SD
41. Spiering, D.J., 2004. Wildlife use of snags in managed ponderosa pine stands in the Black Hills National Forest, South Dakota. Thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
42. Thomas, J.W., Anderson, R.G., Maser, C., Bull, E.L., 1979. Snags. In: Thomas, J.W. (Tech. Ed.), Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests: the Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 553.
43. Thomas, L., Laake, J.L., Strindberg, S., Marques, F.F.C., Buckland, S.T., Borchers, D.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Hedley, S.L., Pollard, J.H., 2003. DISTANCE 4.1 Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK.
44. USDA Forest Service, 1997. Revised Black Hills National Forest Land and Resources Management Plan. USDA For. Serv., Black Hills National Forest, Custer, SD.
45. USDA Forest Service, 2001. Black Hills National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan Phase I Amendment 2001 environmental assessment.
46. J.H. Zar Biostatistical Analysis 4th ed. 1999 Prentice-Hall New Jersey
47. J.E. Zarnowitz, and D.E. Manuwal The effects of forest management on cavity-nesting birds in northwestern Washington J. Wildlife Manage. 49 1985 255 263