Post-pollination mechanisms in Nicotiana longiflora and N. plumbaginifolia: Pollen tube growth rate, offspring paternity and hybridization

Sexual Plant Reproduction

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 187-196

  Figueroa Castro, Dulce M ^a,b   Holtsford, Timothy P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Competitive pollinations; Cryptic self incompatibility; Paternity success; Sympatry

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREEDING; CROSS BREEDING; FLOWER; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HYBRIDIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLEN TUBE; POLLINATION; TOBACCO;

BREEDING; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENOTYPE; GERM CELLS, PLANT; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; POLLEN TUBE; POLLINATION; TOBACCO;

NICOTIANA LONGIFLORA;

EID: 70349984566     PISSN: 09340882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00497-009-0103-6     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aizen MA, Searcy KB, Mulcahy DL (1990) Among- and within-flower comparisons of pollen tube growth following self- and cross-pollinations in Dianthus chinensis (Caryophyllaceae). Am J Bot 77:671-676.
2. Baker AM, Shore JS (1995) Pollen competition in Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Am J Bot 82:717-725.
3. Bateman AJ (1956) Cryptic self-incompatibility in the wall-flower: Cheiranthus cheiri L. Heredity 10:257-261.
4. Bernasconi G, Ashman T-L, Birkhead TR, Bishop JDD, Grossniklaus U, Kubli E, Marshall DL, Schmid B, Skogsmyr I, Snook RR, Taylor D, Till-Bottraud I, Ward PI, Zeh DW, Hellriegel B (2004) Evolutionary ecology of the prezygotic stage. Science 303:971-975.
5. Bertin RI, Sullivan M (1988) Pollen interference and cryptic self-fertility in Campsis radicans. Am J Bot 75:1140-1147.
6. Bowman RN (1987) Cryptic self-incompatibility and the breeding system of Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 74:471-476.
7. Broyles SB (2002) Hybrid bridges to gene flow: a case study in milkweeds (Asclepias). Evolution 56:1943-1953.
8. Carney SE, Cruzan MB, Arnold ML (1994) Reproductive interactions between hybridizing irises: analyses of pollen-tube growth and fertilization success. Am J Bot 81:1169-1175.
9. Casper BB (1985) Self-compatibility in distylous Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae). New Phytol 99:149-154.
10. Casper BB, Sayigh LS, Lee SS (1988) Demonstration of cryptic incompatibility in distylous Amsinckia douglasiana. Evolution 42:248-253.
11. Charlesworth D (1988) Evidence for pollen competition in plants and its relationship to progeny fitness: a comment. Am Nat 132:298-302.
12. Chase MW, Knapp S, Cox AV, Clarkson JJ, Butsko Y, Joseph J, Savolainen V, Parokonny AS (2003) Molecular systematics, GISH and the origin of hybrid taxa in Nicotiana (Solanaceae). Ann Bot 92:107-127.
13. Clarkson JJ, Knapp S, Garcia VF, Olmstead RG, Leitch AR, Chase MW (2004) Phylogenetic relationships in Nicotiana (Solanaceae) inferred from multiple plastid DNA regions. Mol Phylogenet Evol 33:75-90.
14. Cruzan MB (1989) Pollen tube attrition in Erythronium grandiflorum. Am J Bot 76:562-570.
15. Cruzan MB (1990) Pollen-pollen and pollen-style interactions during pollen tube growth in Erythronium grandiflorum (Liliaceae). Am J Bot 77:116-122.
16. Cruzan MB, Barrett SCH (1993) Contribution of cryptic incompatibility to the mating system of Eichornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 47:925-934.
17. de Nettancourt D (2001) Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
18. Diaz A, Macnair MR (1999) Pollen tube competition as a mechanism of prezygotic reproductive isolation between Mimulus nasutus and its presumed progenitor M. guttatus. New Phytol 144:471-478.
19. East EM (1916) Studies on size inheritance in Nicotiana. Genetics 1:164-176.
20. Eckert CG, Allen M (1997) Cryptic self-incompatibility in tristylous Decodon verticillatus (Lythraceae). Am J Bot 84:1391-1397.
21. Emms SK, Hodges SA, Arnold ML (1996) Pollen-tube competition, siring success, and consistent asymmetric hybridization in Louisiana irises. Evolution 50:2201-2206.
22. Erbar C (2003) Pollen tube transmitting tissue: place of competition of male gametophytes. Int J Plant Sci 164:S265-S277.
23. Fenster CB, Sork VL (1988) Effect of crossing distance and male parent on in vivo pollen tube growth in Chamaecrista fasciculata. Am J Bot 75:1898-1903.
24. Figueroa-Castro DM (2008) Mating systems in Nicotiana longiflora and N. plumbaginifolia: the effect of interspecific interactions. Dissertation, University of Missouri.
25. Franklin-Tong VE, Franklin FCH (2003) The different mechanisms of gametophytic self-incompatibility. Philos T Roy Soc B 358:1025-1032.
26. Goodspeed TH (1954) The genus Nicotiana. Origins, relationships and evolution of its species in the light of their distribution morphology and cytogenetics. Chronica Botanica Company, Waltham, Massachussets.
27. Haileselassie T, Mollel M, Skogsmyr I (2005) Effects of nutrient level on maternal choice and siring success in Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitaceae). Evol Ecol 19:275-288.
28. Hessing MB (1989) Differential pollen tube success in Geranium caespitosum. Bot Gaz 150:404-410.
29. Ippolito A (2000) Systematics, floral evolution and speciation in Nicotiana. Dissertation, University of Missouri.
30. Ippolito A, Fernandes GW, Holtsford TP (2004) Pollinator preferences for Nicotiana alata, N. forgetiana, and their F1 hybrids. Evolution 58:2634-2644.
31. Jones KN (1994) Nonrandom mating in Clarkia gracilis (Onagraceae): a case of cryptic self-incompatibility. Am J Bot 81:195-198.
32. Kho YO, Baer J (1968) Observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Euphytica 17:299-302.
33. Kruszewski LJ, Galloway LF (2006) Explaining outcrossing rate in Campanulastrum americanum (Campanulaceae): geitonogamy and cryptic self-incompatibility. Int J Plant Sci 167:455-461.
34. Lankinen A, Skogsmyr I (2002) Pollen competitive ability: the effect of proportion in two-donor crosses. Evol Ecol Res 4:687-700.
35. Lee CB, Page LE, McClure BA, Holtsford TP (2008) Post-pollination hybridization barriers in Nicotiana section Alatae. Sex Plant Reprod 21:183-195.
36. Lim KY, Kovarik A, Matyasek R, Chase MW, Knapp S, McCarthy E, Clarkson JJ, Leitch AR (2006) Comparative genomics and repetitive sequence divergence in the species of diploid Nicotiana section Alatae. Plant J 48:907-919.
37. Marshall DL (1988) Postpollination effects on seed paternity: mechanisms in addition to microgametophyte competition operate in wild radish. Evolution 42:1256-1266.
38. Marshall DL (1991) Nonrandom mating in wild radish: variation in pollen donor success and effects of multiple paternity among one- to six-donor pollinations. Am J Bot 78:1404-1418.
39. Marshall DL, Diggle PK (2001) Mechanisms of differential pollen donor performance in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae). Am J Bot 88:242-257.
40. Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1985) Proximal causes of multiple paternity in wild radish, Raphanus sativus. Am Nat 126:596-605.
41. Marshall DL, Ellstrand NC (1986) Sexual selection in Raphanus sativus: experimental data on nonrandom fertilization, maternal choice, and consequences of multiple paternity. Am Nat 127:446-461.
42. Marshall DL, Oliveras DM (2001) Does differential seed siring success change over time or with pollination history in wild radish, Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae)? Am J Bot 88:2232-2242.
43. Marshall DL, Folsom MW, Hatfield C, Bennett T (1996) Does interference competition among pollen grains occur in wild radish? Evolution 50:1842-1848.
44. Marshall DL, Shaner MGM, Oliva J-P (2007) Effects of pollen load size on seed paternity in wild radish: the roles of pollen competition and mate choice. Evolution 61:1925-1937.
45. Martin NH, Willis JH (2007) Ecological divergence associated with mating system causes nearly complete reproductive isolation between sympatric Mimulus species. Evolution 61:68-82.
46. Montalvo AM (1992) Relative success of self and outcross pollen comparing mixed- and single-donor pollinations in Aquilegia caerulea. Evolution 46:1181-1198.
47. Rigney LP, Thomson JD, Cruzan MB, Brunet J (1993) Differential success of pollen donors in a self-compatible lily. Evolution 47:915-924.
48. Shaner MGM, Marshall DL (2003) Under how wide a set of conditions will nonrandom mating occur in Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae)? Am J Bot 90:1604-1611.
49. Skogsmyr I, Lankinen A (1999) Selection on pollen competitive ability in relation to stochastic factors influencing pollen deposition. Evol Ecol Res 1:971-985.
50. Snow AA, Spira TP (1991) Differential pollen-tube growth rates and nonrandom fertilization in Hibiscusmoscheutos (Malvaceae). Am J Bot 78:1419-1426.
51. Soule JW (2007) Heterochrony of floral and mating system characters between Nicotiana longiflora and N. plumbaginifolia. Master thesis, University of Missouri.
52. Travers SE, Mazer SJ (2000) The absence of cryptic self-incompatibility in Clarkia unguiculata (Onagraceae). Am J Bot 87:191-196.
53. Walsh NE, Charlesworth D (1992) Evolutionary interpretations of differences in pollen tube growth rates. Q Rev Biol 67:19-37.
54. Weller SG, Ornduff R (1989) Incompatibility in Amsinckia grandiflora (Boraginaceae): distribution of callose plugs and pollen tubes following inter- and intramorph crosses. Am J Bot 76:277-282.
55. Weller SG, Ornduff R (1991) Pollen tube growth and inbreeding depression in Amsinckia grandiflora (Boraginaceae). Am J Bot 78:801-804.
56. Wendt T, Ferreira CMB, Gelli FAP, Iglesias RR (2001) Reproductive biology and natural hybridization between two endemic species of Pitcairnia (Bromeliaceae). Am J Bot 88: 1760-1767.
57. Williams EG, Rouse JL (1990) Relationships of pollen size, pistil length and pollen tube growth rates in Rhododendron and their influence on hybridization. Sex Plant Reprod 3:7-17.