A phylogenetic mixture model for the evolution of gene expression

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2363-2372

  Eng, Kevin H ^a,b   Bravo, Héctor Corrada ^a   Kele, Sündüz ^a,b  

^a University of Wisconsin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene expression; Likelihood ratio test; Mixture model; Natural selection; Phylogenetic correction

Indexed keywords

ABC TRANSPORTER; ADENOSINE DIPHOSPHATE RIBOSE; ALPHA GLUCOSIDASE; GLUCOSE TRANSPORTER; GUANINE NUCLEOTIDE BINDING PROTEIN; HELICASE; PERMEASE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE;

ARTICLE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TAXON;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 70349934563     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msp149     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Blomberg SP, Garland TG, Ives AR. 2003. Testing for phyloge-netic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
2. Cheverud JM, Dow MM, Leutenegger W. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
3. Christman MC, Jernigan RW, Culver D. 1997. A comparison of two models for estimating phylogenetic effect on trait variation. Evolution 51:262-266.
4. Corrada Bravo H, Wright S, Eng KH, Keleş S, Wahba G. 2009. Machine learning for Tracking. In: van Dyk D, Welling M, editors. Estimating tree structured covariance matrices via mixed-integer programming. Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics (AISTATS). JMLR: W&CP 5, Clearwater Beach, Florida, April 16-18, 2009, pp. 41-48.
5. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc. 39:185-197.
6. Eng KH, Keleş S, Wahba G. 2008. A linear mixed effects clustering model for multi-species time course gene expression data. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Statistics. Report No.: 1143.
7. Everitt BS, Hand DJ. 1981. Finite mixture distributions. London: Chapman and Hall.
8. Fay JC, Wittkopp PJ. 2008. Evaluating the role of natural selection in the evolution of gene regulation. Heredity 100: 191-199.
9. Felsenstein J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat. 125:1-15.
10. Felsenstein J. 1988. Phylogenies and the quantitative characters. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 19:447-471.
11. Felsenstein J. 2008. Comparative methods with sampling error and within-species variation: contrasts revisited and revised. Am Nat. 171:713-725.
12. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat. 160:712-726.
13. Garland T Jr, Bennett AF, Rezende EL. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J Exp Biol. 208:3015-3035.
14. Gu X. 2004. Statistical framework for phylogenomic analysis of gene family expression profiles. Genetics 167:531-542.
15. Guo H, Weiss RE, Gu X, Suchard M. 2007. Time squared: repeated measures on phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 24:352-362.
16. Harvey PH, Pagel MD. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Housworth EA, Martins EP, Lynch M. 2004. The phylogenetic mixed model. Am Nat. 163:84-96.
18. Hulsenbeck JP, Rannala B. 1997. Phylogenetic methods come of age: testing hypotheses in an evolutionary context. Science 276:227-232.
19. Ives AR, Midford PE, Garland T Jr. 2007. Within-species variation and measurment error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst Biol. 56:252-270.
20. Lynch M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45:1065-1080.
21. Martins EP, Garland T Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
22. Martins EP, Hansen TF. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat. 149:646-667.
23. Martins EP, Housworth EA. 2002. Phylogeny shape and the phy-logenetic comparative method. Syst Biol. 51:873-880.
24. Nuzhdin SV, Wayne ML, Harmon K, McIntyre LM. 2004. Common pattern of evolution of gene expression level and protein sequence in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1308-1317.
25. Oakley TH, Gu Z, Abouheif E, Patel NH, Li WH. 2005. Comparative methods for the analysis of gene-expression evolution: an example using yeast functional genomic data. Mol Biol Evol. 22:40-50.
26. http://www. lifesci.ucsb.edu/eemb/labs/oakley/pubs/MBE2005data/.
27. Available from: http://www. lifesci.ucsb.edu/eemb/labs/oakley/pubs/ MBE2005data/. Pagel M. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
28. Purvis A, Garland T Jr. 1993. Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Syst Biol. 42:596-1575
29. Rifkin SA, Kim J, White KP. 2003. Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Nat Genet. 33:138-144.
30. Rohlf FJ. 2006. A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution 60:1509-1515.
31. Saitou N. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 4:406-425.
32. Thornton JW, DeSalle R. 2000. Gene family evolution and ho-mology: genomics meets phylogenetics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 1:41-73.
33. Whitehead A, Crawford DL. 2006. Neutral and adaptive variation in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.