An effect of referential scene constraint on search implies scene segmentation

Visual Cognition

Volumn 17, Issue 6-7, 2009, Pages 1004-1028

  Zelinsky, Gregory J ^a   Schmidt, Joseph ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aerial images; Eye movements; Region segmentation; Scene context; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

EID: 70349933573     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280902764315     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Antes, J., & Penland, J. (1981). Picture context effects on eye movement patterns. In D. Fisher, R. Monty, & J. Senders (Eds.) Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 157-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Bar, M. (2004). Visual objects in context. Nature Neuroscience Reviews, 5, 617-629.
3. Bar, M., & Aminoff, E. (2003). Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron, 38, 347-358.
4. Biederman, I. (1981). On the semantics of a glance at a scene. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.) Perceptual organization (pp. 213-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Boyce, S. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1989). Effect of background information on object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 556-566.
6. Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.) Approaches to studying world-situated language use: Bridging the language-as-product and language-action traditions (pp. 95-129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition: The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106, 1465-1477.
8. Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cueing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 699-706.
9. Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99-108.
10. Brown-Schmidt, S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2006). Watching the eye when talking about size: An investigation of message formulation and utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 592-609.
11. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 753-763.
12. Chen, X., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Research, 46, 4118-4133.
13. Chun, M. M. (2000). Contextual cueing of visual attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 170-178.
14. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 27-71.
15. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
16. Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(3), 453-459.
17. De Graf, P., de Troy, A., & d'Ydewalle, G. (1992). Local and global contextual constraints on the identification of objects in scenes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 489-508.
18. Eckstein, M. P., Beutter, B. R., & Stone, L. S. (2001). Quantifying the performance limits of human saccadic targeting during visual search. Perception, 30, 1389-1401.
19. Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973-980.
20. Eckstein, M. P., Shimozaki, S. S., & Abbey, C. K. (2002). The footprints of visual attention in the Posner cueing paradigm revealed by classification images. Journal of Vision, 2, 25-45.
21. Einhäuser, W., & König, P. (2003). Does luminance-contrast contribute to a saliency map for overt visual attention? European Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1089-1097.
22. Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (1990). Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. Science, 247, 721-723.
23. Foulsham, T., & Underwood, G. (2007). How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception? Perception, 36, 1123-1138.
24. Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.
25. Geisler, W. S., Perry, J. S., & Najemnik, J. (2006). Visual search: The role of peripheral information measured using gaze-contingent displays. Journal of Vision, 6, 858-873.
26. Goffaux, V., Jacques, C., Mouraux, A., Oliva, A., Rossion, B., & Schyns, P. G. (2005). Diagnostic colours contribute to early stages of scene categorization: Behavioural and neurophysiological evidences. Visual Cognition, 12, 878-892.
27. Green, D., & Swets, J. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Krieger.
28. Henderson, J. M. (2003). Human gaze control in real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 498-504.
29. Henderson, J. M. (2005). Introduction to real-world scene perception. Visual Cognition, 12, 849-851.
30. Henderson, J. M. (2007). Regarding scenes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 219-222.
31. Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 210-228.
32. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2005). Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition, 96, B23-B32.
33. Hummel, J. E., & Biederman, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
34. Intraub, H. (1989). Illusory conjunctions of forms, objects, and scenes during rapid serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 98-109.
35. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
36. Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20, 1254-1259.
37. Kersten, D., Mamassian, P., & Yuille, A. (2004). Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 271-304.
38. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S. J., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Does contextual cueing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 816-828.
39. Li, F. F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 99, 9596-9601.
40. Loftus, G., & Mackworth, N. (1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565-572.
41. Logan, G. D. (1995). Linguistic and conceptual control of visual spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 103-174.
42. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: Freeman.
43. Najemnik, J., & Geisler, W. S. (2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387-391.
44. Neider,M. B., Chen, X., Dickinson, C., Brennan, S. E., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2005). Sharing eyegaze is better than speaking in a time-critical consensus task. In Abstracts of the 46th annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society (Vol. 10, No. 72). Toronto, Canada: Psychonomic Society.
45. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006a). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research, 46, 614-621.
46. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006b). Searching for camouflaged targets: Effects of targetbackground similarity on visual search. Vision Research, 46, 2217-2235.
47. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Exploring set size effects in scenes: Identifying the objects of search. Visual Cognition, 16, 1-10.
48. Oliva, A., & Schyns, P. G. (1997). Coarse blobs or fine edges? Evidence that information diagnosticity changes the perception of complex visual stimuli. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 107-772.
49. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42, 145-175.
50. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2006). Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research: Visual Perception, 155, 23-36.
51. Oliva, A., Torralba, A., Castelhano, M., & Henderson, J. M. (2003). Top-down control of visual attention in object detection. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, 1, 253-256.
52. Palmer, J., Ames, C., & Lindsey, D. (1993). Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 108-130.
53. Palmer, S. E. (1975). Visual perception and world knowledge: Notes on a model of sensorycognitive interaction. In D. A. Norman & D. E. Rumelhart (Eds.) Explorations in cognition (pp. 279-307). San Francisco: Freeman.
54. Potter, M. C. (1976). Short term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 509-522.
55. Potter, M. C., Staub, A., & O'Connor, D. H. (2004). Pictorial and conceptual representation of glimpsed pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 478-489.
56. Sanocki, T. (2003). Representation and perception of scenic layout. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 43-86.
57. Schyns, P. G., & Oliva, A. (1994). From blobs to boundary edges: Evidence for time - and spatialscale-dependent scene recognition. Psychological Science, 5, 195-200.
58. Shaw, M. (1982). Attending to multiple sources of information. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 353-409.
59. Tanenhaus,M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration f visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634.
60. Tatler, B. W., Baddeley, R. J., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2005). Visual correlates of fixation selection: Effects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45, 643-659.
61. Theeuwes, J. (2004). Top down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 65-70.
62. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
63. Torralba, A. (2003). Modeling global scene factors in attention. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 20, 1407-1418.
64. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of attention in natural scenes: The role of global features on object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
65. Turano, K. A., Geruschat, D. R., & Baker, F. H. (2003). Oculomotor strategies for direction of gaze tested with a real-world activity. Vision Research, 43(3), 333-346.
66. Underwood, G., & Foulsham, T. (2006). Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1931-1945.
67. Vincent, B. T., Troscianko, T., & Gilchrist, I. D. (2007). Investigating a space-variant weighted salience account of visual selection. Vision Research, 47, 1809-1820.
68. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
69. Zelinsky, G. J. (1999). Precueing target location in a variable set size "nonsearch" task: Dissociating search-based and interference-based explanations for set size effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 875-903.
70. Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115(4), 787-835.
71. Zelinsky, G. J., Rao, R., Hayhoe, M., & Ballard, D. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8, 448-453.
72. Zelinsky, G. J., Zhang, W., Yu, B., Chen, X., & Samaras, D. (2006). The role of top-down and bottom-up processes in guiding eye movements during visual search. In Y. Weiss, B. Scholkopf, & J. Platt (Eds.) Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 18, pp. 1609-1616). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.