Invasive breast cancers detected by screening mammography: A detailed comparison of computer-aided detection-assisted single reading and double reading

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 442-449

  Cawson, J N ^a,b   Nickson, C ^b,c   Amos, A ^d   Hill, G ^a,b   Whan, A B ^e   Kavanagh, A M ^b,c  

^a ST VINCENT S HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c Key Ctr for Women's Hlth in Soc   (Australia)

^d ECHO (Extending the Capacity of Healthcare Organisations)   (Australia)

^e GEELONG HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast cancer; CAD; Double reading; Sensitivity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X RAY FILM;

AGED; AUSTRALIA; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 70349785612     PISSN: 17549477     EISSN: 17549485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02100.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE, Gad A, Grontoft O. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 1992 30 (1 187 210.
2. Kini VR, Vicini FA, Victor SJ, Dmuchowski CF, Rebner M, Martinez AA. Impact of the mode of detection on outcome in breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy. Am J Clin Oncol 1999 22 (5 429 435.
3. Thurfjell EL, Lernevall KA, Taube AA. Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994 191 (1 241 244.
4. Anderson ED, Muir BB, Walsh JS, Kirkpatrick AE. The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. Clin Radiol 1994 49 (4 248 251.
5. Warren RM, Duffy SW. Comparison of single reading with double reading of mammograms, and change in effectiveness with experience. Br J Radiol 1995 68 (813 958 962.
6. Thurfjell E, Thurfjell MG, Egge E, Bjurstam N. Sensitivity and specificity of computer-assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening. Acta Radiol 1998 39 (4 384 388.
7. Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001 219 (1 192 202.
8. Brem RF, Schoonjans JM. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol 2001 56 (2 150 154.
9. Huo Z, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Metz CE. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. Radiology 2002 224 (2 560 568.
10. Zheng B, Shah R, Wallace L, Hakim C, Ganott MA, Gur D. Computer-aided detection in mammography: an assessment of performance on current and prior images. Acad Radiol 2002 9 (11 1245 1250.
11. Ciatto S, Del Turco MR, Risso G et al. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency test of screening mammography. Eur J Radiol 2003 45 (2 135 138. (Pubitemid 36092135)
12. Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001 220 (3 781 786.
13. Destounis SV, DiNitto P, Logan-Young W, Bonaccio E, Zuley ML, Willison KM. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology 2004 232 (2 578 584.
14. Warren Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D'Orsi CJ et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000 215 (2 554 562.
15. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M et al. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003 181 (3 687 693.
16. Taylor P, Champness J, Given-Wilson R, Johnston K, Potts H. Impact of computer-aided detection prompts on the sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography. Health Technol Assess 2005 9 (6 iii, 1 58.
17. Garvican L, Field S. A pilot evaluation of the R2 image checker system and users' response in the detection of interval breast cancers on previous screening films. Clin Radiol 2001 56 (10 833 837.
18. Ciatto S, Rosselli Del Turco M, Burke P, Visioli C, Paci E, Zappa M. Comparison of standard and double reading and computer-aided detection (CAD) of interval cancers at prior negative screening mammograms: blind review. Br J Cancer 2003 89 (9 1645 1649.
19. Ikeda DM, Birdwell RL, O'Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Brenner RJ. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography. Radiology 2004 230 (3 811 819.
20. Birdwell RL, Bandodkar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005 236 (2 451 457.
21. Dean JC, Ilvento CC. Improved cancer detection using computer-aided detection with diagnostic and screening mammography: prospective study of 104 cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 (1 20 8.
22. Cupples TE, Cunningham JE, Reynolds JC. Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 185 (4 944 950.
23. Morton MJ, Whaley DH, Brandt KR, Amrami KK. Screening mammograms: interpretation with computer-aided detection - prospective evaluation. Radiology 2006 239 (2 375 383.
24. Gilbert FJ, Astley SM, McGee MA et al. Single reading with computer-aided detection and double reading of screening mammograms in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program. Radiology 2006 241 (1 47 53.
25. Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 (6 1483 1491.
26. Fenton JJ, Taplin SH, Carney PA et al. Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography. N Engl J Med 2007 356 (14 1399 1409.
27. Gur D, Sumkin JH, Rockette HE et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96 (3 185 190. (Pubitemid 38263177)
28. Khoo LA, Taylor P, Given-Wilson RM. Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. Radiology 2005 237 (2 444 449.
29. Georgian-Smith D, Moore RH, Halpern E et al. Blinded comparison of computer-aided detection with human second reading in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 189 (5 1135 1141.
30. Taplin SH, Rutter CM, Lehman CD. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006 187 (6 1475 1482.
31. Malich A, Sauner D, Marx C et al. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system. Radiology 2003 228 (3 851 856.
32. Giles GG, Amos A. Evaluation of the organised mammographic screening programme in Australia. Ann Oncol 2003 14 (8 1209 1211.
33. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS), 2nd edn. American College of Radiology, Reston, VA, 1995.
34. Alberdi E, Povykalo A, Strigini L, Ayton P. Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography. Acad Radiol 2004 11 (8 909 918.
35. Balleyguier C, Kinkel K, Fermanian J et al. Computer-aided detection (CAD) in mammography: does it help the junior or the senior radiologist? Eur J Radiol 2005 54 (1 90 6.
36. Feig SA, Sickles EA, Evans WP, Linver MN. Re: changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004 96 (16 1260 1261 author reply 1261.
37. Hukkinen K, Vehmas T, Pamilo M, Kivisaari L. Effect of computer-aided detection on mammographic performance: experimental study on readers with different levels of experience. Acta Radiol 2006 47 (3 257 263.
38. Ellis RL, Meade AA, Mathiason MA, Willison KM, Logan-Young W. Evaluation of computer-aided detection systems in the detection of small invasive breast carcinoma. Radiology 2007 245 (1 88 94.
39. Brem RF, Hoffmeister JW, Rapelyea JA et al. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005 184 (2 439 444.
40. Malich A, Fischer DR, Bottcher J. CAD for mammography: the technique, results, current role and further developments. Eur Radiol 2006 16 (7 1449 1460.
41. Chiarelli AM, Kirsh VA, Klar NS et al. Influence of patterns of hormone replacement therapy use and mammographic density on breast cancer detection. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006 15 (10 1856 1862.