Does social capital affect residents' propensity to move from restructured neighbourhoods?

Housing Studies

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 629-651

  Kleinhans, Reinout ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Propensity to move; Residential mobility; Social capital; The Netherlands; Urban restructuring

Indexed keywords

HOUSING PROJECT; LOGISTICS; NEIGHBORHOOD; PERCEPTION; POLICY STRATEGY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESIDENTIAL MOBILITY; SOCIAL CAPITAL; URBAN PLANNING;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; ROTTERDAM; SOUTH HOLLAND; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 70349750099     PISSN: 02673037     EISSN: 14661810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02673030903085784     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Amerigo, M. & Aragones, J. (1997) A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17, pp. 47-57.
2. Bellair, P. (1997) Social interaction and community crime: examining the importance of neighbor networks, Criminology, 35, pp. 677-703.
3. Blokland, T. (2003) Urban Bonds. Social Relationships in an Inner City Neighbourhood (Cambridge: Polity Press).
4. Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital, in: J. G. Richardson (Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for Sociology of Education, pp. 241-258 (New York: Greenwood Press).
5. Brehm, J. & Rahn, W. (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital, American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), pp. 999-1023.
6. Bridge, G. (2002) The Neighbourhood and Social Networks. Centre for Neighbourhood Research Paper 4. Available at http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk
7. Briggs, X. S. (1998) Brown kids in white suburbs: housing mobility and the many faces of social capital, Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), pp. 177-221.
8. Brown, B., Perkins, D. & Brown, G. (2003) Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: individual and block levels of analysis, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp. 259-271.
9. Carpiano, R. (2007) Neighborhood social capital and adult health: an empirical test of a Bourdieu-based model, Health and Place, 13, pp. 639-655.
10. CFV (2008) Sectorbeeld realisaties woningcorporaties verslagjaar 2008 (Sector Picture Housing Associations' Performances 2008) (Naarden: Centraal Fonds Volkshuisvesting).
11. Clampet-Lundquist, S. (2004) HOPE VI relocation: moving to new neighbourhoods and building new ties, Housing Policy Debate, 15(2), pp. 415-448.
12. Clark, W. & Dieleman, F. (1996) Households and Housing. Choice and Outcomes in the Housing Market (New Brunswick, NY: Center for Urban Policy Research).
13. Clark, W., Deurloo, M. & Dieleman, F. (2006) Residential mobility and neighbourhood outcomes, Housing Studies, 21(3), pp. 323-342.
14. Coleman, J. (1988) Social capital and the creation of human capital, American Journal of Sociology, 94(Supplement), pp. S95-S120.
15. Connerly, C. (1986) The impact of neighborhood social relations on prospective mobility, Social Science Quarterly, March, pp. 187-194.
16. Crawford, A. (2006) 'Fixing broken promises?' Neighbourhood wardens and social capital, Urban Studies, 43(5/6), pp. 957-976.
17. Crow, G., Allan, G. & Summers, M. (2002) Neither busybodies nor nobodies: managing proximity and distance in neighbourly relations, Sociology, 36(1), pp. 127-145.
18. DaVanzo, J. (1981) Repeat migration, information costs, and location-specific capial, Population and Environment, 4, pp. 45-73.
19. Dawkins, C. (2006) Are social networks the ties that bind families to neighborhoods? Housing Studies, 21(6), pp. 867-881.
20. De Groot, C., Manting, D. & Mulder, C. (2007) Intentions to move and actual moving behaviour in the Netherlands. Paper presented at the annual ENHR Conference, Rotterdam, 25-28 June.
21. Dekker, K. (2007) Social capital, neighbourhood attachment and participation in distressed urban areas. A case study in The Hague and Utrecht, The Netherlands, Housing Studies, 22(3), pp. 355-379.
22. Dekker, K. & Bolt, G. (2005) Social cohesion in post-war estates in the Netherlands: differences between socioeconomic and ethnic groups, Urban Studies, 42(13), pp. 2447-2470.
23. Dieleman, F. & Mulder, C. (2002) The geography of residential choice, in: J. Aragonés, G. Francescato & T. Gärling (Eds) Residential Environments: Choice, Satisfaction and Behavior, pp. 35-54 (Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey).
24. DiPasquale, D. & Glaeser, E. (1999) Incentives and social capital: are homeowners better citizens, Journal of Urban Economics, 45(2), pp. 354-384.
25. Duncan, G. & Newman, S. (1976) Expected and actual residential mobility, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 42, pp. 174-186.
26. Ekström, M. (1994) Elderly people's experiences of housing renewal and forced relocation: social theories and contextual analysis in explanations of emotional experiences, Housing Studies, 9, pp. 369-391.
27. Elias, N. & Scotson, J. L. (1965) The Established and the Outsiders: A Sociological Enquiry into Community Problems (London: Frank Cass).
28. Ellaway, A., Macintyre, S. & Kearns, A. (2001) Perceptions of place and health in socially contrasting neighbourhoods, Urban Studies, 38(12), pp. 2299-2316.
29. Field, J. (2003) Social Capital (London: Routledge).
30. Fine, B. (2001) Social Capital versus Social Theory: Political Economy and Social Science at the Turn of the Millennium (London: Routledge).
31. Fisher, C. (1982) To Dwell Among Friends: Personal Networks in Town and City (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press).
32. Flint, J. & Kearns, A. (2006) Housing, neighbourhood renewal and social capital: the case of registered social landlords in Scotland, European Journal of Housing Policy, 6(1), pp. 31-54.
33. Foley, M. & Edwards, B. (1999) Is it time to disinvest in social capital? Journal of Public Policy, 19, pp. 141-173.
34. Forrest, R. & Kearns, A. (1999) Joined-up Places? Social Cohesion and Neighbourhood Regeneration (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
35. Forrest, R. & Kearns, A. (2001) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38(12), pp. 2125-2143.
36. Goetz, E. (2002) Forced relocation vs. voluntary mobility: the effects of dispersal programmes on households, Housing Studies, 17, pp. 107-123.
37. Grannis, R. (1998) The importance of trivial streets: residential streets and residential segregation, American Journal of Sociology, 103(6), pp. 1530-1564.
38. Granovetter, M. (1973) The strength of weak ties, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp. 1360-1380.
39. Green, G., Grimsley, M. & Stafford, B. (2005) The Dynamics of Neighbourhood Sustainability (York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
40. Grootaert, C., Narayan, D., Nyhan-Jones, V. & Woolcock, M. (2002) Integrated questionnaire for measurement of social capital. The World Bank, Social Capital Thematic Group. Available at http://poverty.worldbank.org/library.
41. Halpern, D. (2005) Social Capital (Cambridge: Polity Press).
42. Henning, C. & Lieberg, M. (1996) Strong ties or weak ties? Neighbourhood networks in a new perspective, Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 13, pp. 3-26.
43. Kan, K. (1999) Expected and unexpected residential mobility, Journal of Urban Economics, 53, pp. 72-96.
44. Kan, K. (2007) Residential mobility and social capital, Journal of Urban Economics, 61, pp. 436-457.
45. Kasarda, J. & Janowitz, M. (1974) Community attachment in mass society, American Sociological Review, 39, pp. 328-339.
46. Kearns, A. (2004) Social capital, regeneration and urban policy. Centre for Neighbourhood Research Paper 25. Available at http://www.neighbourhoodcentre.org.uk
47. Kearns, A. & Parkinson, M. (2001) The significance of neighbourhood, Urban Studies, 38(12), pp. 2103-2110.
48. Kleinhans, R. (2003) Displaced but still moving upwards in the housing career? Implications of forced residential relocation in the Netherlands, Housing Studies, 18(4), pp. 473-499.
49. Kleinhans, R. (2004) Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: a review of recent literature, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, pp. 367-390.
50. Kleinhans, R., Priemus, H. & Engbersen, G. (2007) Understanding social capital in recently restructured neighbourhoods. Two case studies in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, Urban Studies, 44(5/6), pp. 1069-1091.
51. Lelieveldt, H. (2004) Helping citizens help themselves. Neighborhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust and norms on neighborhood-oriented forms of participation, Urban Affairs Review, 39(5), pp. 531-551.
52. Lofland, L. (1985) A World of Strangers (Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press).
53. Lu, M. (1998) Analyzing migration decision-making: relationships between residential satisfaction, mobility intentions, and moving behavior, Environment and Planning A, 30(8), pp. 1473-1495.
54. Lu, M. (1999) Do people move when they say they will? Inconsistencies in individual migration behaviour, Population and Environment, 20(5), pp. 467-488.
55. Middleton, A., Murie, A. & Groves, R. (2005) Social capital and neighbourhoods that work, Urban Studies, 42(10), pp. 1711-1738.
56. Ministerie van VROM (1997) Nota Stedelijke Vernieuwing (Policy Memorandum Urban Renewal) (The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment).
57. Ministerie van VROM (2000) Mensen Wensen Wonen: Wonen in de 21ste eeuw (What People Want, Where People Live: Housing in the 21st Century) (The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment).
58. Ministerie van VROM (2004) Leefbaarheid van wijken (Liveability of Neighbourhoods) (The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment).
59. Morris, E., Crull, S. & Winter, W. (1976) Housing norms, housing satisfaction and the propensity to move, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38(2), pp. 309-320.
60. Mulder, C. & Hooimeijers, P. (1999) Residential relocations in the life course, in: L. van Wissen & P. Dykstra (Eds) Population Issues: An Interdisciplinary Focus, pp. 159-186 (New York: Kluwer/Plenum).
61. Parkes, A. & Kearns, A. (2003) Residential perceptions and housing mobility in Scotland: an analysis of the longitudinal Scottish House Condition Survey 1991-1996, Housing Studies, 18(5), pp. 673-701.
62. Parkes, A., Kearns, A. & Atkinson, R. (2002) What makes people dissatisfied with their neighbourhoods? Urban Studies, 39(13), pp. 2413-2438.
63. Pevalin, D. & Rose, D. (2003) Social Capital for Health. Investigating the Links Between Social Capital and Health (Colchester: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex).
64. Portes, A. (1998) Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, 24, pp. 1-24.
65. Portes, A. & Landolt, P. (1996) The downside of social capital, American Prospect, 26, pp. 18-21.
66. Priemus, H. (2004) The path to successful urban renewal: current policy debates in The Netherlands, Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(3), pp. 199-209.
67. Putnam, R. (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
68. Putnam, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon & Schuster).
69. Ross, C., Mirowsky, J. & Pribesh, S. (2001) Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: neighbourhood disadvantage, disorder and mistrust, American Sociological Review, 66, pp. 568-591.
70. Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S. & Earls, F. (1997) Neighbourhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy, Science, 277, pp. 918-924.
71. Silverman, E., Lupton, R. & Fenton, A. (2005) A Good Place for Children? Attracting and Retaining Families in Inner Urban Mixed Income Communities (Coventry/York: Chartered Institute of Housing/Joseph Rowntree Foundation).
72. Skifter Andersen, H. (2008) Why do residents want to leave deprived neighbourhoods? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 23, pp. 79-101.
73. Speare, A., Goldstein, S. & Frey, W. (1975) Residential Mobility, Migration and Metropolitan Change (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger).
74. Stevens, J. (1996) Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
75. Temkin, K. & Rohe, W. (1998) Social capital and neighbourhood stability: an empirical investigation, Housing Policy Debate, 9(1), pp. 66-68.
76. van Beckhoven, E. & van Kempen, R. (2003) Social effects of urban restructuring: a case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, The Netherlands, Housing Studies, 18(6), pp. 853-875.
77. van Bergeijk, E., Kokx, A., Bolt, G. & van Kempen, R. (2008) Helpt herstructurering? Effecten van herstructu- rering op wijken en bewoners (Does Urban Restructuring Help? Effects of Restructuring on Neighbourhoods and Residents) (Delft: Eburon).
78. van der Flier, K. & Thomsen, A. (2006) Life cycle of dwellings and demolition by Dutch housing associations, in: V. Gruis, H. Visscher & R. Kleinhans (Eds) Sustainable Neighbourhood Transformation, pp. 67-92 (Amsterdam: IOS Press).
79. van Ham, M. & Feijten, P. (2008) Who wants to leave the neighbourhood? The effect of being different from the neighbourhood population on wishes to move, Environment & Planning A, 40, pp. 1151-1170.
80. VROM-Raad (2006) Stad en stijging (City and Upward Social Mobility) (The Hague: The Netherlands Council of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment).
81. Wassenberg, F., Arnoldus, M., Goetgeluk, R., Penninga, F. & Reinders, L. (2006) Hoe breed is de buurt? (How Big is the Neighbourhood?) (The Hague: Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment).
82. Woolcock, M. (1998) Social capital and economic development. Towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework, Theory and Society, 27, pp. 151-208.