Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes of dual-rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: Comparison with single-rod constructs

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 20, 2006, Pages 2322-2328

  Hurford, Robert K ^a   Lenke, Lawrence G ^a   Lee, Stanley S ^a   Cheng, Ivan ^a   Sides, Brenda ^a   Bridwell, Keith H ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Anterior spinal fusion; Dual rod constructs; Single rod constructs; Spinal deformity

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; INSTRUMENTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSEUDARTHROSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BONE NAILS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748854996     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000238966.75175.2b     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Moe JH, Purcell GA, Bradford DS. Zielke instrumentation (VDS) for the correction of spinal curvature. Analysis of results in 66 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1983;180:133-53.
2. Ogilvie JW. Anterior spine fusion with Zielke instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. Orthop Clin North Am 1988;19:313-7.
3. Kohler R, Galland O, Mechin H, et al. The Dwyer procedure in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. A 10-year follow-up review of 21 patients. Spine 1990;15:75-80.
4. Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, et al. New anterior instrumentation for the management of thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Application of the Kaneda two-rod system. Spine 1996;21:1250-61.
5. Kaneda K, Shono Y, Satoh S, et al. Anterior correction of thoracic scoliosis with Kaneda anterior spinal system. A preliminary report. Spine 1997;22:1358-68.
6. Otani K, Saito M, Sibasaki K. Anterior instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis: A minimum follow-up of 10 years. Int Orthop 1997;21:4-8.
7. Hammerberg KW, Rodts MF, DeWald RL. Zielke instrumentation. Orthopedics 1988;11:1365-71.
8. Halm HF, Liljenqvist U, Niemeyer T, et al. Halm-Zielke instrumentation for primary stable anterior scoliosis surgery: Operative technique and 2-year results in ten consecutive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients within a prospective clinical trial. Eur Spine J 1998;7:429-34.
9. Bernstein RM, Hall JE. Solid rod short segment anterior fusion in thoracolumbar scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop B 1998;7:124-31.
10. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Maintaining lumbar lordosis with anterior single solid-rod instrumentation in thoracolumbar and lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:1655-62.
11. Sweet FA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:1956-65.
12. Lowe TG, Alongi PR, Smith DA, et al. Anterior single rod instrumentation for thoracolumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without the use of structural interbody support. Spine 2003;28:2232-41.
13. Lowe TG, Betz R, Lenke L, et al. Anterior single-rod instrumentation of the thoracic and lumbar spine: saving levels. Spine 2003;28:S208-16.
14. Saraph VJ, Krismer M, Wimmer C. Operative treatment of scoliosis with the Kaneda anterior spine system. Spine 2005;30:1616-20.
15. Betz RR, Harms J, Clements DH III, et al. Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999;24:225-39.
16. Betz RR, Shufflebarger H. Anterior versus posterior instrumentation for the correction of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:1095-100.
17. Fricka KB, Mahar AT, Newton PO. Biomechanical analysis of anterior scoliosis instrumentation: Differences between single and dual rod systems with and without interbody structural support. Spine 2002;27:702-6.
18. Lowe TG, Enguidanos ST, Smith DA, et al. Single-rod versus dual-rod anterior instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: A biomechanical study. Spine 2005;30:311-7.
19. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83-A:1169-81.
20. O'Brien M, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM, et al. Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc., Memphis, TN; 2004.
21. Gogus A, Talu U, Akman S, et al. Anterior instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Int Orthop 2001;25:317-21.
22. Brodner W, Mun Yue W, Moller HB, et al. Short segment bone-on-bone instrumentation for single curve idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2003;28:S224-33.
23. Polly DW Jr, Cunningham BW, Kuklo TR, et al. Anterior thoracic scoliosis constructs: Effect of rod diameter and intervertebral cages on multi-segmental construct stability. Spine 2003;3:213-9.