Idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: Evaluation 10 years after surgery

Spine

Volumn 32, Issue 19, 2007, Pages 2103-2110

  Bjerkreim, Ingjald ^a   Steen, Harald ^a,b   Brox, Jens Ivar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Cotrel Dubousset; EQ 5D; Health related quality of life; Long term follow up; Prospective; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BACKACHE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COTREL DUBOUSSET INSTRUMENTATION; DISABILITY; EUROQOL QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSWESTRY DISABILITY INDEX; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIODIAGNOSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BACK PAIN; CHILD; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC FIXATION DEVICES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SCOLIOSIS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34548394952     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318145a54a     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Back pain and function 23 years after fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Part II. Spine 2003;28:E373-83.
2. Remes V, Helenius I, Schlenzka D, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) or Universal Spine System (USS) instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): comparison of midterm clinical, functional, and radiologic outcomes. Spine 2004;29:2024-30.
3. Cotrel Y, Dubousset J, Guillaumat M. New universal instrumentation in spinal surgery. Clin Orthop 1988;227:10-23.
4. Dubousset J, Cotrel Y. Application technique of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for scoliosis deformities. Clin Orthop 1991;264:103-10.
5. Asher M, Lai SM, Burton D, et al. Safety and efficacy of Isola instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: two- to 12-year follow-up. Spine 2004;29:2013-23.
6. Kuklo TR, Lenke LG, Won DS, et al. Spontaneous proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:1966-75.
7. King HA, Moe JH, Bradford DS, et al. The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1983;65:1302-13.
8. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr Course Lect 1948;5:261-75.
9. Perdriolle R. In: Maloine SA, ed. La scoliose. Paris: 1979.
10. Denis F. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988;19:291-311.
11. King HA. Selection of fusion levels for posterior instrumentation and fusion in idiopathic scoliosis. Orthop Clin North Am 1988;19:247-55.
12. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, et al. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2006;31:1240-6.
13. Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, et al. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis: evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1990;72:320-7.
14. Holm I, Friis A, Storheim K, et al. Measuring self-reported functional status and pain in patients with chronic low back pain by postal questionnaires: a reliability study. Spine 2003;28:828-33.
15. Fairbank JCT, Davis J, Couper J, et al. Oswestry disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
16. Hägg O, Fritzell P, Romberg K, et al. The General Function Score: a useful tool for measurement of physical disability: validity and reliability. Eur Spine J 2001;10:203-10.
17. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy 1990;16:199-208.
18. Tosteson ANA. Preference-based health outcome measures in low back pain. Spine 2000;25:3161-6.
19. Solberg TK, Olsen JA, Ingebrigtsen T, et al. Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery. Eur Spine J 2005;14:1000-7.
20. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 1983;8:576-84.
21. Goshi K, Boachie-Adjei O, Moore C, et al. Thoracic scoliosis fusion in adolescent and adult idiopathic scoliosis using posterior translational corrective techniques (Isola): is maximum correction of the thoracic curve detrimental to the unfused lumbar curve? Spine J 2004;4:192-201.
22. Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Baldus C, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992;74:1056-67.
23. de Junge T, Dubousset JF, Illes T. Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:754-60.
24. Willers U, Transfeldt EE, Hedlund R. The segmental effect of Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation on vertebral rotation, rib hump and the thoracic cage in idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 1996;5:387-93.
25. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Cho SK, et al. Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2004;29:2040-8.
26. Luk KD, Lu DS, Cheung KM, et al. A prospective comparison of the coronal deformity correction in thoracic scoliosis using four different instrumentations and the fulcrum-bending radiograph. Spine 2004;29:560-3.
27. Puno RM, Grossfeld SL, Johnson JR, et al. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1992;17(suppl):258-62.
28. Thompson JP, Transfeldt EE, Bradford DS, et al. Decompensation after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1990;15:927-31.
29. Takahashi S, Delecrin J, Passuti N. Surgical treatment of idiopathic scoliosis in adults: an age-related analysis of outcome. Spine 2002;27:1742-8.
30. Rinella A, Bridwell K, Kim Y, et al. Late complications of adult idiopathic scoliosis primary fusions to L4 and above: the effect of age and distal fusion level. Spine 2004;29:318-25.
31. Richards BR, Emara KM. Delayed infections after posterior TSRH spinal instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis: revisited. Spine 2001;26:1990-6.
32. Danielsson AJ, Nachemson AL. Childbearing, curve progression, and sexual function in women 22 years after treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Spine 2001;26:1449-56.
33. Brox JI, Sørensen R, Friis A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lumbar instrumented fusion and cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic low back pain and disc degeneration. Spine 2003;28:1913-21.
34. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, et al. 2001 Volvo award winner in clinical studies. Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 2001;26:2521-32.
35. Fairbank J. Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ 2005;330:1485.
36. Brox JI, Reikeras O, Nygaard O, et al. Lumbar instrumented fusion compared with cognitive intervention and exercises in patients with chronic back pain after previous surgery for disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Pain 2006;122:145-55.
37. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, et al. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;316:736-41.
38. Helenius I, Remes V, Yrjonen T, et al. Harrington and Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: long-term functional and radiographic outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:2303-9.