From conceptual to perceptual reality: Trust in digital repositories

Library Review

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 593-606

  Prieto, Adolfo G ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communities; Digital storage; Stakeholder analysis; Trust; User studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349656558     PISSN: 00242535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00242530910987082     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. American Council of Learned Societies (2006), Our cultural commonwealth: the report of the American Council of Learned Societies Commission on Cyberinfrastructure for the Humanities and Social Sciences, available at: www.acls.org/cyberinfrastructure/OurCulturalCommonwealth.pdf (accessed 1 November 2008).
2. Atkins, D.E. et al. (2003), Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Panel on Cyberinfrastructure,available at: www.nsf.gov/cise/sci/reports/atkins.pdf (accessed 5 November 2008).
3. Beall, J. (2005), Metadata and data quality problems in the digital library, Journal of Digital Information, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 1-20, available at: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/65/68 (accessed 1 November 2008).
4. Bedi, P. and Banati, H. (2006), Assessing user trust to improve web usability, Journal of Computer Science, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 283-7.
5. Berman, F. et al. (2007), The need for formalized trust in digital repository collaborative infrastructure, paper presented at the National Science Foundation (NSF)/Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) Repositories Workshop, Phoenix, AZ, available at: www.sis.pitt.edu/~repwkshop/papers/berman_schottlaender.pdf (accessed 31October 2008).
6. Borgman, C.L. (1999), What are digital libraries? Competing visions, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 227-43.
7. Borgman, C.L. (2007), Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Borgman, C.L. et al. (2007), Drowning in data: digital library architecture to support scientific use of embedded sensor networks, paper presented at the 7th Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)/Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, available at: http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/cborgman/pubs/JCDL07_117_fin.pdf (accessed 5 November 2008).
9. Brown, P.O. et al. (2003), Bethesda statement on open access publishing, available at: www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed 3 November 2008).
10. Brown, L., Griffiths, R. and Rascoff, M. (2007), University publishing in a digital age: highlights of the Ithaka Report, ARL: A Bimonthly Report, Nos. 252-253, pp. 1-5, available at: www.arl.org/bm~doc/arl-br-252-253-ithaka.pdf (accessed 3 November 2008).
11. Corritore, C.L., Kracher, B. and Wiedenbeck, S. (2003), On-line trust: concepts, evolving themes, a model, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 58 No. 6, pp. 737-58.
12. Couzin, J. (2006), Don't pretty up that picture just yet, Science, Vol. 314 No. 5807, pp. 1866-68.
13. Crow, R. (2002), The case for institutional repositories: a SPARC position paper, ARL: A Bimonthly Report, No. 223, pp. 1-4, available at: www.arl.org/bm~doc/instrepo.pdf (accessed 5 November 2008).
14. Digital Curation Centre (2005), Digital curation and preservation: defining the research agenda for the next decade, Report of the Warwick Workshop, Warwick, available at: www.dcc.ac.uk/events/warwick_2005/Warwick_Workshop_report.pdf (accessed 3 November 2008).
15. Digital Curation Centre (2007), What is a digital repository?, available at: www.dcc.ac.uk/tools/digital-repository (accessed 4 November 2008).
16. Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M. and Gurrea, R. (2006), The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty, Information and Management, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 1-14.
17. Foster, N.F. and Gibbons, S. (2005), Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11 No. 1, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html (accessed 4 November 2008).
18. Gierveld, H. (2006), Considering a marketing and communications approach for an institutional repository, Ariadne, No. 49, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue49/gierveld (accessed 4 November 2008).
19. Griffiths, N. (2006), Enhancing peer-to-peer collaboration using trust, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 849-58.
20. Hank, C. (2006), Digital curation and trusted repositories, seeking success: JCDL 2006 workshop report, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 12, Nos. 7/8, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/july06/hank/07hank.html (accessed 3 November 2008).
21. Hey, T. and Trefethen, A. (2003), The data deluge: an e-science perspective, in Berman, F., Fox, G. and Hey, A.J.G. (Eds), Grid Computing: Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality, John Wiley, Chichester, pp. 809-24, available at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/cmsweb/downloads/rcuk/research/esci/datadeluge.pdf (accessed 5 November 2008).
22. Jantz, R. and Giarlo, M.J. (2005), Digital preservation: architecture and technology for trusted digital repositories, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 11 No. 6, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/june05/jantz/06jantz.html (accessed 1 November 2008).
23. Johnson, R.K. (2002), Institutional repositories: partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 8 No. 11, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html (accessed 4 November 2008).
24. Jøsang, A., Ismail, R. and Boyd, C. (2007), A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 618-44.
25. Khoo, M. (2004), The use of visual artifacts in the user-informed development of an educational digital library collection, Journal of Digital Information, Vol. 5 No. 3, available at: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/142/140 (accessed 7 November 2008).
26. Kim, J. (2007), Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories, Journal of Digital Information, Vol. 8 No. 2, available at: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/193/177 (accessed 4 November 2008).
27. Klang, M. (2001), Who do you trust? Beyond encryption, secure e-business, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 31 No. 3, pp. 293-301.
28. Kollock, P. (1999), The production of trust in online markets, in Lawler, E.J. et al. (Eds), Advances in Group Processes, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, Vol. 16, pp. 99-123, available at: www.sscnet.ucla.edu/soc/faculty/kollock/papers/online_trust.htm (accessed 31October 2008).
29. Lawson, D. and Spies, P.B. (2004), Developing a trusted digital repository: the OCLC experience, VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 27-32.
30. McKay, D. (2007), Institutional repositories and their 'other' users: usability beyond authors, Ariadne, No. 52, available at: www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue52/mckay (accessed 4 November 2008).
31. Magnan, S.S. (2007), Commentary: the promise of digital scholarship in SLA research and language pedagogy, Language Learning and Technology, Vol. 11 No. 3, pp. 152-5, available at: http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num3/pdf/magnan.pdf (accessed 5 November 2008).
32. Modern Language Association (2001), Guidelines for evaluating work with digital media in the modern languages, ADFL Bulletin, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 67-8, available at: www.mla.org/guidelines_evaluation_digital (accessed 5 November 2008).
33. Murray-Rust, C. (2007), Advocating for digital scholarship: highlights of the report of the ACLS, ARL: A Bimonthly Report, No. 251, pp. 1-3, available at: www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlbr251acls.pdf (accessed 1 November 2008).
34. Online Computer Library Center and Center for Research Libraries (2007), Trustworthy repositories audit & certification: criteria and checklist, available at: www.crl.edu/PDF/trac.pdf (accessed 3 November 2008).
35. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007), OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding, available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/61/38500813.pdf (accessed 1 November 2008).
36. Pu, P. and Chen, L. (2007), Trust-inspiring explanation interfaces for recommender systems, Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 20 No. 6, pp. 542-56.
37. Research Libraries Group (2002), Trusted digital repositories: attributes and responsibilities, available at: www.oclc.org/programs/ourwork/past/trustedrep/repositories.pdf (accessed 31 October 2008).
38. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M.A. and McCarthy, J.D. (2005), The mechanics of trust: a framework for research and design, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 381-422.
39. Ross, S. and McHugh, A. (2006), The role of evidence in establishing trust in repositories, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 12 Nos. 7-8, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/july06/ross/07ross.html (accessed 7 November 2008).
40. Salo, J. and Karjaluoto, H. (2007), A conceptual model of trust in the online environment, Online Information Review, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 604-21.
41. Skogsrud, H., Benatallah, B. and Casati, F. (2004), A trust negotiation system for digital library Web services, International Journal on Digital Libraries, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 185-207.
42. Thibodeau, K. (2007), If you build it, will it fly? Criteria for success in a digital repository, Journal of Digital Information, Vol. 8 No. 2, available at: http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/197/174 (accessed 7 November 2008).
43. Van de Sompel, H. et al. (2004), Resource harvesting within the OAI-PMH framework, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 10 No.12, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/december04/vandesompel/12vandesompel.html (accessed 1 November 2008).
44. Van House, N.A. (2002), Digital libraries and practices of trust: networked biodiversity information, Social Epistemology, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 99-114.
45. Wærn, Y. and Ramberg, R. (1996), People's perception of human and computer advice, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 17-27.
46. Wallis, J.C. et al. (2007), Know thy sensor: trust, data quality, and data integrity in scientific digital libraries, paper presented at the 11th European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Budapest, available at: http://polaris.gseis.ucla.edu/cborgman/pubs/wallisetal_2007.pdf (accessed 5 November 2008).
47. Young, J.R. (2006), Book 2.0: scholars turn monographs into digital conversations, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Vol. 52 No. 47, pp. A20-4.
48. Ziegler, C. and Golbeck, J. (2007), Investigating interactions of trust and interest similarity, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 460-75.
49. Zimmerman, A.S. (2008), New knowledge from old data: the role of standards in the sharing and reuse of ecological data, Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 33 No. 5, pp. 631-52.