Control of cooperative switching of microwrinkle orientations by nanopatterns

Chaos

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Ohzono, Takuya ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOMATERIAL;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; SURFACE PROPERTY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; NANOSTRUCTURES; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 70349651751     PISSN: 10541500     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3170898     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. T. Tanaka, S. -T. Sun, Y. Hirokawa, S. Katayama, J. Kucera, Y. Hirose, and T. Amiya, Nature (London) 0028-0836 325, 796 (1987). 10.1038/325796a0
2. L. F. Hernandez and P. B. Green, Plant Cell 1040-4651 5, 1725 (1993). 10.1105/tpc.5.12.1725 (Pubitemid 2034675)
3. E. Sharon, B. Roman, M. Marder, G. -S. Shin, and H. L. Swinney, Nature (London) 0028-0836 419, 579 (2002). 10.1038/419579a
4. E. Cerda and L. Mahadevan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 90, 074302 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.074302
5. J. C. Meyer, A. K. Geim, M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, T. J. Booth, and S. Roth, Nature (London) 0028-0836 446, 60 (2007). 10.1038/nature05545 (Pubitemid 46348040)
6. J. Genzer and J. Groenewold, Soft Matter 1744-683X 2, 310 (2006). 10.1039/b516741h
7. D. Moldovan and L. Golubovic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 82, 2884 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2884
8. Z. Huang, W. Hong, and Z. Suo, Phys. Rev. E 1063-651X 70, 030601 (R) (2004). 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.030601
9. N. Uchida, Physica D 0167-2789 205, 267 (2005). 10.1016/j.physd.2005.01. 009 (Pubitemid 40753193)
10. N. Bowden, S. Brittain, A. G. Evans, J. W. Hutchinson, and G. M. Whitesides, Nature (London) 0028-0836 393, 146 (1998). 10.1038/30193 (Pubitemid 28242249)
11. W. T. S. Huck, N. Bowden, P. Onck, T. Pardoen, J. W. Hutchinson, and G. M. Whitesides, Langmuir 0743-7463 16, 3497 (2000). 10.1021/la991302l (Pubitemid 30581088)
12. P. J. Yoo and H. H. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 91, 154502 (2003). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.154502
13. S. P. Lacour, S. Wagner, Z. Huang, and Z. Suo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 0003-6951 82, 2404 (2003). 10.1063/1.1565683
14. C. M. Stafford, C. Harrison, K. L. Beers, A. Karim, E. J. Amis, M. R. Vanlandingham, H. -C. Kim, W. Volksen, R. D. Miller, and E. E. Simonyi, Nature Mater. 1476-1122 3, 545 (2004). 10.1038/nmat1175
15. K. Efimenko, M. Rackatis, E. Manias, A. Vaziri, L. Mahadevan, and J. Genzer, Nature Mater. 1476-1122 4, 293 (2005). 10.1038/nmat1342 (Pubitemid 40450208)
16. D. -Y. Khang, H. Jiang, Y. Huang, and J. A. Rogers, Science 0036-8075 311, 208 (2006). 10.1126/science.1121401 (Pubitemid 43108182)
17. H. Vandeparre, J. Ĺopold̀s, C. Poulard, S. Desprez, G. Derue, C. Gay, and P. Damman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 99, 188302 (2007). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.188302 (Pubitemid 350074459)
18. T. Ohzono and M. Shimomura, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 69, 132202 (2004) 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.132202; T. Ohzono and M. Shimomura, Langmuir 0743-7463 21, 7230 (2005) 10.1021/la0503449; T. Ohzono and M. Shimomura, Phys. Rev. E 1063-651X 73, 040601 (R) (2006). 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.040601
19. T. Ohzono, H. Watanabe, R. Vendamme, C. Kamaga, T. Kunitake, T. Ishihara, and M. Shimomura, Adv. Mater. (Weinheim, Ger.) 0935-9648 19, 3229 (2007). 10.1002/adma.200700618 (Pubitemid 350063889)
20. C. Bowman and A. C. Newell, Rev. Mod. Phys. 0034-6861 70, 289 (1998). 10.1103/RevModPhys.70.289 (Pubitemid 128022014)
21. G. Parry, J. Colin, C. Coupeau, F. Foucher, A. Cimetìre, and J. Grilh́, Appl. Phys. Lett. 0003-6951 86, 081905 (2005). 10.1063/1.1868878 (Pubitemid 40495257)
22. G. Bertotti, Hysteresis in Magnetism (Academic, San Diego, 1998).
23. J. P. Sethna, K. Dahmen, S. Kartha, J. A. Krumhansl, B. W. Roberts, and J. D. Shore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 70, 3347 (1993). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70. 3347
24. A. Magni, Phys. Rev. B 0163-1829 59, 985 (1999). 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.985
25. Since the sample is rotated, the shear strain is assumed to be negligibly small. Even if the shear strain is not negligible, the direction of the rotation of the principal strain axis due to the shear is identical to that without shear strain. Thus, the shear strain is responsible for only a small enhancement of the rotation of the principal strain axis of compression.
26. D. A. Egolf, I. V. Melnikov, and E. Bodenschatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 0031-9007 80, 3228 (1998). 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3228
27. Here, the effect of the deformation induced by the uniaxial compression is neglected because the strain is small (∼5%) and the effect causes only slight deviation in λd,n.
28. Even if we consider the effect of 5% compressive strain on the change in d, the effect is at most 5%. Thus, the effect is neglected here.
29. G. Tarjus, S. A. Kivelson, Z. Nussinov, and P. Viot, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 0953-8984 17, R1143 (2005). 10.1088/0953-8984/17/50/R01
30. B. K. Chakrabarti and M. Acharyya, Rev. Mod. Phys. 0034-6861 71, 847 (1999). 10.1103/RevModPhys.71.847
31. I. Graham and T. A. J. Duke, Phys. Rev. E 1063-651X 71, 061923 (2005). 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.061923