Teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 73, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Barnett, Candace W ^a,b   Matthews, Hewitt W ^a  

^a MERCER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MERCER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Evaluation; Survey; Teaching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLLEGE; EDUCATION; PEER REVIEW; PHARMACY STUDENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; TEACHER; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; CURRICULUM; E-MAIL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SCHOOL;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, PHARMACY; ELECTRONIC MAIL; FACULTY; HUMANS; PEER GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, PHARMACY; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; TEACHING; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 70349645708     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj7306103     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Barnett CW, Matthews HW. Current procedures used to evaluate teaching in schools of pharmacy. Am J Pharm Educ. 1998;62(4): 388-391
2. Henderson ML, Speedie S, Zanowaik P. Final report of the ad hoc committee on teacher/teaching evaluation of the council of faculties. Am J Pharm Educ. 1980;44:285-292
3. Surratt CK, Desselle SP. Pharmacy students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(1):Article 6.
4. Anderson HM, Cain J, Bird E. Online student course evaluations: review of literature and a pilot study. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005;69(1):Article 5. (Pubitemid 41602670)
5. McCollum M, Cyr T, Criner TM, et al. Implementation of a Web-based system for obtaining curricular assessment data. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67(3):Article 80. (Pubitemid 43119163)
6. Kasiar JB, Schroeder SL, Holstad SG. Comparison of traditional and Web-based course evaluation processes in a required, team-taught pharmacotherapy course. Am J Pharm Educ. 2002;66(3):268-270
7. Chisholm MA, Miller AW, Spruill WJ, et al. Influence of interactive videoconferencing on the performance of pharmacy students and instructors. Am J Pharm Educ. 2000;64(2):152-158
8. Kidd RS, Latif DA. Student evaluations: are they valid measures of course effectiveness? Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68(3):Article 61.
9. Barnett CW, Matthews HW, Jackson RA. A comparison between student ratings and faculty self-ratings of instructional effectiveness. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67(4):Article 117.
10. Hansen LB, McCollum M, Paulsen SM, et al. Evaluation of an evidence-based peer teaching assessment program. Am J Pharm Educ. 2007;71(3):Article 45. (Pubitemid 46869313)
11. Schultz KK, Latif D. The planning and implementation of a faculty peer review teaching project. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006;70(2):Article 32.