Pharmacy students' perceptions of a teaching evaluation process

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Surratt, Christopher K ^a   Desselle, Shane P ^a  

^a DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Evaluation; Questionnaire; Survey; Teaching

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHARMACIST; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STUDENT ATTITUDE; STUDENT SATISFACTION; TEACHING; VOCATIONAL EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; PERCEPTION; PHARMACY STUDENT; STANDARD; UNIVERSITY;

CURRICULUM; FACULTY; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, PHARMACY; TEACHING;

EID: 33947276358     PISSN: 00029459     EISSN: 15536467     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5688/aj710106     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Naftulin DH, Ware JE, Donnelly, FA. The Doctor Fox lecture: a paradigm of educational seduction. J Med Educ. 1973;48:630-5.
2. Feldman KA. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and external (neutral) observers. Res Higher Educ. 1989;39:137-89.
3. Murry HG, Rushton PJ, Paunonen SV. Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82:250-61.
4. Barnett CW, Matthews HW. Student evaluation of classroom teaching: a study of pharmacy faculty and effects on instructional practices. Am J Pharm Educ. 1997;61:345-50.
5. Barnett CW, Matthews HW, Jackson RA. A comparison between student ratings and faculty self-ratings of instructional effectiveness. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67:Article 117.
6. Aleamoni LM. Student rating myths versus research facts from 1924 to 1998. J Personnel Eval Educ. 1999;13:153-66.
7. Cashin WE. Student ratings of teaching: the research revisited. IDEA paper No. 32, September, 1995. Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Kansas State University. Available at http://eric.ed.gov Eric # ED402338 Accessed January 31, 2007.
8. Marsh HW, Dunkin M. Students' evaluations of university teaching: a multidimensional perspective. In: Smart JC, ed. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Vol. 8. New York: Springer; 1992:143-233.
9. Centra JA. Reflective faculty evaluation: enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
10. Centra JA, Creech FR. The relationship between student, teachers, and course characteristics and student ratings of teacher effectiveness. Project Report 76-1. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ, 1976.
11. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1978.
12. Wolfgang AP, Gupchup GV, Plake KS. Relative importance of performance criteria in promotion and tenure decisions: perceptions of pharmacy faculty members. Am J Pharm Educ. 1995;59:342-7.
13. Feldman KA. College students' views of male and female college teachers: part I - evidence from the social laboratory and experiments. Res Higher Educ. 1992;33:317-75.
14. Gaubatz NB. Is there gender bias in student evaluations of teaching? J Higher Educ. January 2000.
15. Cashin WE, Downey RG. Using global student ratings for summative evaluation. J Educ Psychol. 1992;84:563-72.
16. Williams WM, Ceci SJ. How'm I doing? Problems with student ratings of instructors and courses. Change. 1997;29:13-23.
17. Fink AA. How to Ask Survey Questions. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, Inc, 1995.
18. Schuman H, Presser S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1981.
19. Desselle SP. Construction, implementation, and analysis of summated rating attitude scales. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005;69:Article 97.
20. Emery CR, Kramer TR, Tian RG. Return to academic standards: A critique of student evaluations of teaching effectiveness. Qual Assurance Educ. 2003;11:37-46.