Dissipation in films of adsorbed nanospheres studied by quartz crystal microbalance (QCM)

Analytical Chemistry

Volumn 81, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 8167-8176

  Johannsmann, Diethelm ^a   Reviakine, Ilya ^b,c   Richter, Ralf P ^b,d  

^a CLAUSTHAL UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b CIC BIOMAGUNE   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^d MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMOLECULAR ADSORPTION; BIOMOLECULAR OBJECTS; CONTACT ZONE; DISSIPATION MECHANISM; ENERGY DISSIPATION MECHANISM; FEM CALCULATION; GLOBULAR PROTEINS; HYDRODYNAMIC INTERACTION; MEGAHERTZ FREQUENCIES; PHOSPHOLIPID VESICLES; QUANTITATIVE INTERPRETATION; SURFACE COVERAGES;

ADSORPTION; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID DYNAMICS; LIPOSOMES; OXIDE MINERALS; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; PIEZOELECTRIC DEVICES; PROTEINS; QUARTZ; SPHERES;

QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCES;

GLOBULAR PROTEIN; NANOSPHERE;

ADSORPTION KINETICS; ARTICLE; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HYDRODYNAMICS; QUARTZ CRYSTAL MICROBALANCE; VIRUS PARTICLE;

ADSORPTION; ALGORITHMS; ANNEXIN A5; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; NANOSPHERES; QUARTZ; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 70349614658     PISSN: 00032700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ac901381z     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Cooper, M. A. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2003, 377, 834.
2. Domack, A.; Prucker, O.; et al. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 56, 680.
3. Reimhult, E.; Larsson, C.; Kasemo, B.; Höök, F. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 7211.
4. Bingen, P.; Wang, G.; Steinmetz, N. F.; Rodahl, M.; Richter, R. P. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 8880.
5. Rojas, E.; Gallego, M.; Reviakine, I. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 8982.
6. Laschitsch, A.; Menges, B.; Johannsmann, D. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2000, 77, 2252.
7. Edvardsson, M.; Svedhem, S.; Wang, G.; Richter, R.; Rodahl, M.; Kasemo, B. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 349.
8. Cady, W. G. Piezoelectricity; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1946.
9. Johannsmann, D. In Piezoelectric Sensors; Steinem, C., Janshoff, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, 2006; p 49.
10. Rodahl, M.; Hook, F.; Krozer, A.; et al. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 1995, 66, 3924.
11. Martin, F.; Newton, M. I.; McHale, G.; Melzak, Ka. A.; Gizeli, E. Biosens. Bioelectr. 2004, 19, 627.
12. Gulyaev, Y. V. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 1998, 45, 935.
13. McMullan, C.; Gizeli, E.; Mehta, H.; Lowe, C. R. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2000, 33, 3053.
14. Johannsmann, D. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2008, 10, 4516.
15. The ratio of motional resistance (R1) and dissipation (D) should be constant (based on the Butterworth-van Dyke equivalent circuit). It is experimentally observed, however, that the ratio can fluctuate slightly.
16. Johannsmann, D.; Heim, L. O. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 094505.
17. Johannsmann, D.; Mathauer, K.; Wegner, G.; Knoll, W. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 46, 7808.
18. Johannsmann, D. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1999, 200, 501 (eq 13).
19. Nakamoto, T.; Moriizumi, T. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1990, 29, 963.
20. Bandey, H. L.; Martin, S. J.; Cernosek, R. W.; Hillman, A. R. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2205.
21. Lucklum, R.; Behling, C.; Hauptmann, P. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 2488.
22. Voinova, M. V.; Rodahl, M.; Jonson, M.; Kasemo, B. Phys. Scr. 1999, 59, 391.
23. Du, B. Y.; Johannsmann, D. Langmuir 2004, 20, 2809.
24. Historically, the Df ratio was first used in the context of nanotribology. For a layer of rigid spheres adsorbed to a solid surface from vacuum, the Df ratio is proportional to the momentum relaxation time or "slip time". For details, see:(a) Krim, J.; Widom, A. Phys. Rev. B 1988, 38, 12184.
25. (b) Krim, J. Nano Today 2007, 2, 38.
26. Johannsmann, D.; Reviakine, I.; Rojas, E.; Gallego, M. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 8891.
27. Tellechea, E.; Johannsmann, D.; Steinmetz, N. F.; Richter, R. P.; Reviakine, I. Langmuir 2009, 25, 5177.
28. Richter, R. P.; Brisson, A. Langmuir 2004, 20, 4609.
29. Richter, R. P.; Lai Kee Him, J.; Tessier, B.; Tessier, C.; Brisson, A. Biophys. J. 2005, 89, 3372.
30. Wolny, P.; Spatz, J. P.; Richter, R. P. Langmuir 2009, in press.
31. Höök, F.; Ray, A.; Nordén, B.; Kasemo, B. Langmuir 2001, 17, 8305.
32. Brisson, A.; Mosser, G.; Huber, R. J. Mol. Biol. 1991, 220, 199.
33. Reviakine, I.; Bergsma-Schutter, W.; Mazeres-Dubut, C.; et al. J. Struct. Biol. 2000, 131, 234.
34. Steinmetz, N. F.; Bock, E.; Richter, R. P.; Spatz, J. P.; Lomonossoff, G. P.; Evans, D. J. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 456.
35. Keller, C. A.; Kasemo, B. Biophys. J. 1998, 75, 1397.
36. Frey, W.; Scheif, W.; Vogel, V. Langmuir 1996, 12, 1312.
37. Direct evidence for 2D crystallization on SLB-coated QCM-D sensors is still missing. It may potentially be obstructed by the nanometer-scale roughness of the sensor surface, as demonstrated for other proteins; see ref 28.
38. Richter, R. P.; Maury, N.; Brisson, A. Langmuir 2005, 21, 299.
39. Reviakine, I.; Rossetti, F. F.; Morozov, A. N.; et al. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 204711.
40. Horton, M. R.; Reich, C.; Gast, A. P. Langmuir 2007, 23, 6263.
41. Roos, W. H.; Ivanovska, I. L.; Evilevitch, A.; Wuite, G. J. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007, 64, 1484.
42. Tsortos, A.; Papadakis, G.; Mitsakakis, K.; Melzak, K. A.; Gizeli, E. Biophys. J. 2008, 94, 2706-2715.
43. Tsortos, A.; Papadakis, G.; Gizeli, E. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 24, 842-847.
44. Anderson, T. L. Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 2005.
45. Sauerbrey, G. Z. Phys. 1959, 155, 206.
46. Borovikov, A. P. Instrum. Exp. Techn. 1976, 19, 223.
47. Kanazawa, K. K.; Gordon, J. G., II. Anal. Chim. Acta 1985, 99, 175.
48. Domack, A.; Prucker, O.; Rühe, J.; Johannsmann, D. Phys. Rev. E 1997, 56, 680.
49. Urbakh, M.; Daikhin, L. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 4866.
50. Oron, A.; Davis, S. H.; Bankoff, S. G. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1997, 69, 931.
51. O'Neill, M. E. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1968, 23, 1293.
52. Goldman, A. J.; Cox, R. G.; Brenner, H. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1967, 22, 637.
53. Such a dependence was found in the experiments reported in ref 25. However, these experiments were conducted on vesicles, which are much softer than the particles investigated here. In this case, the deformability of bulk of the vesicles did play a role in addition to the properties of the contact zone.
54. This calculation made use of eq 7 in ref 2.
55. Höök, F.; Vörös, J.; Rodahl, M.; Kurrat, R.; Böni, P.; Ramsden, J. J.; Textor, M.; Spencer, N. D.; Tengvall, P.; Gold, J.; Kasemo, B. Colloids Surf. B 2002, 24, 155.
56. Batchelor, G. K. An Introduction to Fluid Mechanics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, U.K., 1976.
57. Dybwad, G. L. J. Appl. Phys. 1985, 58, 2789.
58. Laschitsch, A.; Johannsmann, D. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 85, 3759.
59. Bell, J.; Köhler, T.; Woermann, T. Ber. Bunsen. Phys. Chem. 1997, 101, 879.
60. Horn, F. M.; Richtering, W.; Bergenholtz, J.; Willenbacher, N.; Wagner, N. J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2000, 225, 166.
61. Borovsky, B.; Mason, B. L.; Krim, J. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 88, 4017.
62. Edvardsson, M.; Rodahl, M.; Hook, F. Analyst 2006, 131, 822.
63. Cooper, M. A.; Dultsev, F. N.; Minson, T.; Ostanin, V. P.; Abell, C.; Klenerman, D. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 833.
64. The pressure gradient has units of N/m, because the simulation is conducted in two dimensions. Otherwise, an integrated pressure gradient would be a force.
65. Lighthill, J. J. Sound Vibr. 1978, 61, 391.
66. Richter, R. P.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Brisson, A. Biophys. J. 2003, 85, 3035.