Mapping cultural frame shifting in interaction design with blending theory

International Journal of Design

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 5-17

  Markussen, Thomas ^a   Krogh, Peter Gall ^b  

^a Designskolen Kolding   (Denmark)

^b ALEXANDRA INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Blending theory; Cognitive semiotics; Cultural aspects; Interaction design; Meaning construction; User experience

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349573657     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baerentsen, K., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. In Proceedings of the 2nd Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction (pp. 51-60). New York: ACM.
2. Caroll, J. M., & Olson, J. R. (1997). Mental models. In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp.45-65). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Coulson, S. (2006). Semantic leaps: Frame shifting and conceptual blending in meaning construction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cienki, A. (2007). Frames, idealized cognitive models, and domains. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Crary, J. (1990). Techniques of the observer: On vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Dewey, J. (1958). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn.
7. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263-287.
8. Dindler, C., Krogh, P., Beck, S., Stenfeldt, L., Nielsen, K., & Grønbæk, K. (2007). Peephole experiences-Field experiments with mixed reality hydroscopes in a marine center. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing for User eXperiences (No. 20). New York: ACM.
9. Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundation of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Dunne, A. (2006). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133-187.
13. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
14. Fillmore, C. (1975). An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In C. Cogen, H. Thomson, G. Thurgood., & K. Whistler (Eds.), Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistic Society (pp. 123-31). Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
15. Ford, G., & Gelderblom, H. (2003). The effects of culture on performance achieved through the use of human computer interaction. In Proceedings of the 2003 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on Enablement through Technology (pp. 218-230). New York: ACM.
16. Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J., & Benford, S. (2003). Ambiguity as a resource for design. In V. Bellotti & T. Erickson (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (pp. 233-240). New York: ACM.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18. Giddens, A. (1985). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19. Holland, D., & Quinn, N. (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hornecker, E. (2005). A design theme for tangible interaction: Embodied facilitation. In H. Gellersen, K. Schmidt, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, & W. E. Mackay (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 23-43). Dordrecht: Springer.
21. Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 437-446). New York: ACM.
22. Hurtienne, J., & Israel, J. H. (2007). Image schemas and their metaphorical extensions: Intuitive patterns for tangible interaction. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 127-134). New York: ACM.
23. Hutchins, E. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555-1577.
24. Jay, M. (1993). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
26. Klemmer, S., Hartmann, B., & Takayama, L. (2006). How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 140-149). New York: ACM.
27. Kövecses, Z. (2006). Language, mind, and culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Krippendorff, K. (1995). On the essential contexts of artefacts. In V. Margolin & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The idea of design (pp. 156-184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
30. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.
31. Larsen, A., Twenebowa, T. R., & Edwards, J. (2007). The feel dimension of technology interaction: Exploring tangibles through movement and touch. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 271-278). New York: ACM.
32. Markussen, T. (in press). A cognitive semiotic approach to the aesthetic interplay between form and meaning in responsive environments. In S. Vihma & T-M. Karjalainen. (Eds.), Design semiotics in use. Helsinki: University of Art and Design Helsinki.
33. McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp.211-277). New York: McGraw-Hill.
35. Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing for interactions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Norman, D. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
37. Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O., Krogh, P., & Ludvigsen, M. (2004). Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 269-276). New York: ACM.
38. Ringberg, T., & Reihlen, M. (2008). Towards a socio-cognitive approach to knowledge transfer. Journal of Management Studies 45(5), 912-935.
39. Schank, R., & Abelson, R. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.