Defining useful surrogates for user participation in online medical learning

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 567-574

  Beddy, Peter ^a   Ridgway, Paul F ^a   Beddy, David ^a   Clarke, Eric ^b   Traynor, Oscar ^b   Tierney, Sean ^a  

^a ADELAIDE AND MEATH HOSPITAL   (Ireland)

^b ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Feedback; Participation; Surgery; Web based distance learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERNET; IRELAND; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICS; TEACHING;

EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INTERNET; IRELAND; LEARNING; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; TEACHING; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70349504832     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-008-9141-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Buzzell, P., Chamberlaine, V., & Pintauro, S. (2002). The effectiveness of web-based, multimedia teaching methods of human body composition analysis. Advances in Physiology Education, 26, 21-29.
2. Debas, H. T., Bass, B. L., Brennan, M. F., et al. (2005). American Surgical Association Blue Ribbon Committee Report on Surgical Education: 2004. Annals of Surgery, 241, 1-8.
3. Erickson, S. R., Chang, A., Johnson, C. E., & Gruppen, L. D. (2003). Lecture versus web tutorial for pharmacy students' learning of MDI technique. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 37, 500-505. doi:10.1345/aph.1C374.
4. Folse, J. R. (1996). Surgical education-Addressing the challenges of change. Surgery, 120, 575-579. doi:10.1016/S0039-6060(96)80001-8.
5. Gorman, P. J., Meier, A. H., Rawn, C., & Krummel, T. M. (2000). The future of medical education is no longer blood and guts, it is bits and bytes. American Journal of Surgery, 180, 353-356. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00514-6.
6. Healy, D., Fleming, F., Gilhooley, D., et al. (2005). Electronic learning can facilitate student performance in undergraduate surgical education: A prospective observational study. BMC Medical Education, 5, 23. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-5-23.
7. Kronz, J. D., Silberman, M. A., Allsbrook, W. C., & Epstein, J. I. (2000). A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: Validation of a new medical education paradigm. Cancer, 89, 1818-1823. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(20001015)89:8<1818::AID-CNCR23>3.0.CO;2-J.
8. Moodle. (2003). http://moodle.org. Accessed 12 Mar 2008.
9. Nilsson, M., Bolinder, G., Held, C., et al. (2008). Evaluation of a web-based ECG-interpretation programme for undergraduate medical students. BMC Medical Education, 8, 25. doi:10.1186/1472-6920-8-25.
10. Ochoa, J., & Wludyka, P. (2008). Randomized comparison between traditional and traditional plus interactive web-based methods for teaching seizure disorders. Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 20, 114-117. doi:10.1080/10401330801989513.
11. Porte, M., Xeroulis, G., Reznick, R., & Dubrowski, A. (2007). Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills. American Journal of Surgery, 193, 105-110. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.03.016.
12. RCSI. (2003). http://www.rcsi.ie/postgraduate_surgery/school_for_surgeons/index. Accessed 12 Mar 2008.
13. Ridgway, P. F., Sheikh, A., Sweeney, K. J., et al. (2007). Surgical e-learning: Validation of multimedia web-based lectures. Medical Education, 41, 168-172. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02669.x.
14. Rogers, D., Regehr, G., Yeh, K., & Howdieshell, T. (1998). Computer assisted learning versus a lecture and feedback seminar for teaching a basic surgical skill. American Journal of Surgery, 175, 508-510. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00087-7.
15. Servais, E., Lamorte, W., Agarwal, S., et al. (2006). Teaching surgical decision making: an interactive, web-based approach. The Journal of Surgical Research, 134, 102-106. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2005.11.583.