Journals for computer-mediated learning: Publications of value for the online educator

International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 1-20

  Elbeck, Matt ^a   Mandernach, B Jean ^b  

^a TROY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PARK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Blended learning; Computer mediated learning; Distance learning; Distributed learning; E learning; Journal ranking; Mobile learning; Online educators; Open learning; Virtual learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349384801     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14923831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.676     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. An, L., & Qiu, J. (2003). Research on the relationships between Chinese journal impact factors and web impact factors and external web link counts. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 22(4), 398-402.
2. Baumgartner, H., & Pieters, R. (2003). The structural influence of marketing journals: A citation analysis of the discipline and its sub-areas over time. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 123-39.
3. Bollen, J., Rodriguez, M.A., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). Journal status. Scientometrics, 69(3), 669-687.
4. Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30, 107-17.
5. Cabell, D.W.E. (2006). Cabell's directory of publishing opportunities in marketing. Beaumont, CA: Cabell Publishing.
6. Cal Poly Pomona Library. (2009). Scholarly journals. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://www.csupomona.edu/~library/tutorials/scholarly_journals.html
7. Check SEO. (2009). Link popularity. Check Search Engine Optimization. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://www.check-seo.com/LinkPopularity.php
8. Chen, P., Xie, H., Maslov, S., & Redner, S. (2007). Finding scientific gems with Google. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), January, 8-15.
9. Cornell University Library. (2009). Distinguishing scholarly journals from other periodicals. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://www.library.cornell.edu/olinuris/ref/research/skill20.html
10. Czinkota, M.R. (2000). International information cross-fertilization in marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1305-14.
11. Elbeck, M., & Mandernach, B. J. (2008). Expanding the value of scholarly, open access e-journals. Library and Information Science Research, 30(4), 237-241.
12. Grewal, D., & Levy, M. (2010). Marketing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
13. Harter, S., & Ford, C. (2000). Web-based analysis of e-journal impact: Approaches, problems and issues. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(13) 1159-76.
14. Hascall, V.C., Bollen, J., & Hanson, R. (2007). Impact factor page rankled. ASBMB Today, July, 16-19.
15. Hawes, J.M., & Keillor, B. (2002). Assessing marketing journals: A mission-based approach. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 3(2) 70-86.
16. Hult, G.T.M., Neese, W.T., & Bashaw, R.E. (1997). Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education, 19(1), 37-52.
17. Jacso, P. (2005). Visualizing overlap and rank differences among web-wide search engines: Some free tools and services. Online Information Review, 29(5), 554-560. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://www.jacso.info/PDFs/jacso-visualizing-overlap.pdf
18. Jobber, D., & Simpson, P. (1988). A citation analysis of selected marketing journals, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 5(2), 137-42.
19. Kim, M.T. (1991). Ranking journals in library and information science: A comparison of perceptual and citation-based measures. College and Research Libraries, 52(1), 24-37.
20. Larson, R.R. (1996). Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web: An exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace. ASIS, 96. Retrieved on January 23, 2009, from http://sherlock.berkeley.edu/asis96/asis96.html
21. Luke, R.H., & Doke, E.R. (1987). Marketing journal hierarchies: Faculty perceptions, 1986-1987. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 15(2), 74-8.
22. Mason, P.M., Steagall, J.W., & Fabritius, M.M. (1997). Economics journal rankings by the type of school: Perceptions versus citations. Quarterly Journal of Business & Economics, 36(1), 60-79.
23. McCown, F., & Nelson, M.L. (2007). Agreeing to disagree: Search engines and their public interfaces. Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (DCDL)'07, June 18-23, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1260000/1255237/p309mccown.pdf?key1=1255237&key2=1477939321&coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&CFID=29810093&CFTOKEN=13911580
24. Meric, F., Bernstam, E.V., Mirza, N.Q., Hunt, K.K., Ames, F.C., Ross, M.I., et al. (2002). Breast cancer on the World Wide Web: Cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. British Medical Journal, 324, March, 577-81.
25. Mylonopoulos, N.A., & Theoharakis, V. (2001). Global perceptions of IS journals. Communications of the ACM, 44(9), 29-37.
26. Nisonger, T.E. (1999). JASIS and library and information science journal rankings: A review and analysis of the last half century, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(11), 1004-1020.
27. Parnell, J.A. (1997). Assessing management journal quality: A methodological critique and empirical analysis. The Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 33, March, 69-83.
28. Polonsky, M.J., Jones, G., & Kearsley, M.J. (1999). Accessibility: An alternative method of ranking marketing journals? Journal of Marketing Education, 21(3), 181-93.
29. Polonsky, M.J., & Whitelaw, P. (2005). What are we measuring when we evaluate journals? Journal of Marketing Education, 27(2) 189-201.
30. Polonsky, M.J., Garma, R., & Mittelstaedt, J.D. (2006). An examination of the globalization of authorship in publishing in 20 leading marketing journals. European Business Review, 18(6), 437-56.
31. Rice, B.A., & Stankus, T. (1983). Publication quality indicators for tenure or promotion decisions: What can the librarian ethically report? College and Research Libraries, 44, March, 173-8.
32. R&R Web design. (2008). Top global search engines December 2008 - market share. Retrieved April 11, 2009, from http://r-rwebdesign.com/blog/?p=353
33. Rogers, I. (2002). The Google Pagerank algorithm and how it works. Retrieved on January 27, 2009 from http://www.ianrogers.net/google-page-rank/
34. Rosenstreich, D. & Wooliscroft, B. (2006). How international are the top academic journals? The case of marketing. European Business Review, 18(6), 422-36.
35. Search Engine Watch.com (2007). Major search engines and directories. Retrieved January 29, 2009, from http://searchenginewatch.com/2156221
36. Shugan, S.M. (2003). Journal rankings: Save the outlets for your research. Marketing Science, 22(4), 437-41
37. Top25Web. (2009). Google PageRank report. Retrieved April 9, 2009, from http://www.top25web.com/pagerank.php
38. Vaughan, L., & Hysen, K. (2002). Relationship between links to journal web sites and impact factors. Aslib Proceedings, 54(6), 356-61
39. Vaughan, L., & Thelwall, M. (2003). Scholarly use of the web: What are the key inducers of links to journal web sites? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 54(1), 29-38.