Engaging with the learning object economy

Reusing Online Resources: A Sustainable Approach to E-learning

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 35-45

  Campbell, Lorna M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85138912839     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203465677-12     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. ADL—Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative (2001) Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) version 1.2: The SCORM Overview, http://adlnet.org/Scorm/downloads.cfm#spec
2. Campbell, L, Littlejohn, A and Duncan, C (2001) Share and share alike: Encouraging the reuse of academic resources through the Scottish electronic Staff Development Library, ALT-J, 9, 2
3. CanCore (2002) Canadian Core learning Resource Metadata Application Profile FAQ, http://www.cancore.ca/faq.html
4. Gordon, J, Graham, G and Thomas, M (2002) Learning objects—The Compelling Proposition, symposium hosted by Learning and Teaching Scotland
5. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (1990) IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries, IEEE, New York
6. IEEE Learning Technology Standardization Committee (2002) Draft standard for learning object Metadata, version 6.4, http://ltsc.ieee.org/doc/wg12/LOM_WD6_4.pdf
7. IMS (2001) Learning Resource Meta-data Information Model, XML Binding Specification and Best Practices and Implementation Guide, Version 1.2.1, Final Specification, http://www.imsproject.org/metadata/index.html
8. IMS (2002) Digital Repositories Interoperability Information Model, XML Binding Specification and Best Practices and Implementation Guide, Version 1.0, Base documents JISC (2002) Exchange for Learning Programme (X4L), Circular 2/02, http://www.jisc.ac.uk/pub02/c02_02.html
9. Koper E J R (2001) Modelling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML, document prepared for the IMS Learning Design Working Group, http://eml.ou.nl/introduction/docs/pedmetamodel.pdf
10. MERLOT (2000) Evaluation Standards for Learning Materials in MERLOT, http://taste.merlot.org/eval.html
11. Naeve, A (1999) Conceptual Navigation and Multiple Scale Narration in a Knowledge Manifold, Royal Institute of Technology, Numerical Analysis and Computing Science, Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan, Stockholm, Sweden, http://cid.nada.kth.se/sv/pdf/cid_52.pdf
12. Nicholson, D, Neill, S, Currier, S,Will, L, Gilchrist, A, Russell, R and Day, M (2001) HILT: High Level Thesaurus Project. Final report to RSLP and JISC, http://hilt.cdlr.strath.ac.uk/Reports/FinalReport.html
13. RAE (2001) A Guide to the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise, http://www.hero.ac.uk/rae/Pubs/index.htm
14. Rawlings, A, van Rosmalen, P, Koper, R, Rodriguez-Artacho, M and Lefrere, P (2002) ‘Survey of Educational Modelling Languages (EMLs)’, draft version h
15. Van Assche, F, Anido-Rifon, L Campbell, L M and Willem, M (2002) ‘CEN/ISSS Learning Technologies Workshop Vocabularies Repository’, version 0, draft 5
16. Wiley, D A (2000) Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy, in ed D A Wiley, The Instructional Use of Learning Objects, http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc