Putting the family into family business research

Family Business Review

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 216-219

  Dyer Jr , W Gibb ^a   Dyer, W Justin ^b  

^a BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Effectiveness; Family business; Research

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349300280     PISSN: 08944865     EISSN: 17416248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894486509333042     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Anderson, R.C., & Reeb, D.M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S & P 500. Journal of Finance, 58, 1301-1328.
2. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
3. Broderick, C.B. (1993). Understanding family processes. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Constantine, L.L. (1993). The structure of family paradigms: An analytical model of family variation. Journal of Marriage and Family Therapy, 19, 39-70.
5. Cortina, J.M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 98-104.
6. Danes, S.M., Stafford, K., Haynes, G., & Amarapurkar, S.S. (2009). Family capital of family firms: Bridging human, social and financial capital. Family Business Review, 22, 199-215.
7. Day, R.D., Gavazzi, S.M., & Acock, A. (2001). Compelling family processes. In A. Thorton (Ed.), The well-being of children and families: Research and data needs (pp. 103-126). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
8. Dyer, W.G., Jr. (1986). Cultural change in family firms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Dyer, W.G., Jr. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 27, 401-416.
10. Dyer, W.G., Jr. (2006). Examining the "family effect" on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19, 253-273.
11. Fiese, B.H., Tomcho, T.J., Douglas, M., Josephs, K., Poltrock, S., & Baker, T. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration? Journal of Family Psychology, 16, 381-390.
12. Finkel, S.E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data (Vol. 105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Jones, C.D., Makri, M., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2008). Affiliate directors and perceived risk bearing in publicly traded family-controlled firms: The case of diversification. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32, 1007-1033.
14. Kaye, K. (1996). When the family business is a sickness. Family Business Review, 9, 347-368.
15. Lansberg, I. (1999). Succeeding generations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
16. MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Jarvis, C.B. (2005). The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 710-730.
17. Olsen, D.H. (1993). Circumplex model of marital and family systems: Assessing family functioning. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (2nd ed., pp. 104-137). New York: Guilford.
18. Schulze, W.G., Lubatkin, M.H., Dino, R.N., & Buchholtz, A.K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12, 99-116.
19. Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, P. (2008). Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review, 21, 331-345.
20. Sorenson, R.L. (1999). Conflict strategies used by successful family businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 325-339.
21. Stafford, K., Duncan, K.A., Danes, S.M., & Winter, M. (1999). A research model of sustainable family businesses. Family Business Review, 12, 197-208.
22. Ward, J.L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Whitchurch, G.G., & Constantine, L.L. (1993). Systems theory. In P. G. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm, & S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theories and methods: A contexutal approach (pp. 325-352). New York: Plenum.
24. Zahra, S.A., Hayton, J.C., Neubaum, D.O., Dibrell, C., & Craig, C. (2008). Culture of family commitment and strategic flexibility: The moderating effect of stewardship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32, 1035-1054.