Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 235-241

  Uludag, Bulent ^a   Ozturk, Ozge ^b   Ozturk, A Nilgun ^a  

^a ANKARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMIRA BOND; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; ED PRIMER II; EXCITE CEMENT; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PANAVIA TPN S; PANAVIA TPN-S; PHOSPHATE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RELYX ARC; RESIN CEMENT; SINGLE BOND; TOOTH CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; INLAYS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MOLAR, THIRD; PHOSPHATES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 70349291216     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60161-X     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Pilo R., and Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multiple-step dentin bonding agents. J Prosthet Dent 82 (1999) 209-213
2. Nilgun Ozturk A., Usumez A., Ozturk B., and Usumez S. Influence of different light sources on microleakage of class V composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil 31 (2004) 500-504
3. Schmeiser R., and Gülzow H.J. The influence of luting cements on the fermentation of sucrose by oral microorganisms. J Dent 27 (1999) 37-41
4. Camps J., Déjou J., Rémusat M., and About I. Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations. Dent Mater 16 (2000) 432-440
5. Murray P.E., About I., Franquin J.C., Remusat M., and Smith A.J. Restorative pulpal and repair responses. J Am Dent Assoc 132 (2001) 482-491
6. Ben-Amer A., Cardash H.S., and Judes H. The sealing of the tooth/amalgam interface by corrosion products. J Oral Rehabil 22 (1995) 101-104
7. Piwowarczyk A., Lauer H.C., and Sorensen J.A. Microleakage of various cementing agents for full cast crowns. Dent Mater 21 (2005) 445-453
8. Moreira Júnior G., Sobrinho A.P., Nicoli J.R., Bambirra E.A., Farias L.M., Carvalho M.A., et al. Evaluation of microbial infiltration in restored cavities-an alternative method. J Endod 25 (1999) 605-608
9. Going R.E. Microleakage around dental restorations: a summarizing review. J Am Dent Assoc 84 (1972) 1349-1357
10. Triadan H. When is microleakage a real clinical problem?. Oper Dent 12 (1987) 153-157
11. Iwami Y., Hayashi M., Takeshige F., and Ebisu S. The accuracy of electrical method for microleakage evaluation by a three-dimensional analysis. J Dent 35 (2007) 268-274
12. Buonocore M.G. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34 (1955) 849-853
13. Retief D.H., and Denys F.R. Adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2 Spec No (1989) 133-144
14. Gordan V.V., Vargas M.A., Cobb D.S., and Denehy G.E. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 23 (1998) 244-249
15. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 26 (2001) 60-69
16. Soares C.J., Martins L.R., Fernandes Neto A.J., and Giannini M. Marginal adaptation of indirect composites and ceramic inlay systems. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 689-694
17. Bott B., and Hannig M. Optimizing class II composite resin esthetic restorations by use of ceramic inserts. J Esthet Dent 7 (1995) 110-117
18. Bullard R.H., Leinfelder K.F., and Russell C.M. Effect of coefficient of thermal expansion on microleakage. J Am Dent Assoc 116 (1988) 871-874
19. Donly K.J., Wild T.W., Bowen R.L., and Jensen M.E. An in vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res 68 (1989) 1234-1237
20. Bott B., and Hannig M. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. Dent Mater 19 (2003) 264-269
21. Inokoshi S., Willems G., Van Meerbeek B., Lambrechts P., Braem M., and Vanherle G. Dual-cure luting composites: Part I: Filler particle distribution. J Oral Rehabil 20 (1993) 133-146
22. Sjögren G., Molin M., Van Dijken J., and Bergman M. Ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with either a dual-cured or a chemically cured composite resin luting agent. A 2-year clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand 53 (1995) 325-330
23. Dietschi D., Magne P., and Holz J. Recent trends in esthetic restorations for posterior teeth. Quintessence Int 25 (1994) 659-677
24. Mitchell C.A., Douglas W.H., and Cheng Y.S. Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements. Dent Mater 15 (1999) 7-13
25. Li Z.C., and White S.N. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 597-609
26. Federlin M., Schmidt S., Hiller K.A., Thonemann B., and Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: influence of preparation design and luting material on internal adaptation. Oper Dent 29 (2004) 560-570
27. van Dijken J.W., Hasselrot L., Ormin A., and Olofsson A.L. Restorations with extensive dentin/enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci 109 (2001) 222-229
28. Sjögren G., Molin M., and van Dijken J.W. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent. Acta Odontol Scand 56 (1998) 263-267
29. Neme A.L., Evans D.B., and Maxson B.B. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results. Oper Dent 25 (2000) 512-519
30. Duke E.S. Adhesion and its application with restorative materials. Dent Clin North Am 37 (1993) 329-340
31. Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentine bonding systems. J Dent 22 (1994) 73-81
32. Frankenberger R., Krämer N., and Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25 (2000) 324-330
33. Pashley D.H., Sano H., Ciucchi B., Yoshiyama M., and Carvalho R.M. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11 (1995) 117-125
34. Swift E.J., Perdigão J., and Heymann H.O. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 26 (1995) 95-110
35. Ferrari M., Mannocci F., Vichi A., and Davidson C.L. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 10 (1997) 66-70
36. Reid J.S., Saunders W.P., and Chen Y.Y. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 22 (1991) 295-298
37. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 26 (2001) 60-69
38. Reid J.S., Saunders W.P., and Chen Y.Y. The effect of bonding agent and fissure sealant on microleakage of composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 22 (1991) 295-298
39. Salz U., Zimmerman J., and Salzer T. Self-curing, self-etching adhesive cement systems. J Adhes Dent 7 (2005) 7-17
40. Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J., Yoshida Y., Inoue S., Vargas M., Vijay P., et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 28 (2003) 215-235
41. Carvalho R.M., Pegoraro T.A., Tay F.R., Pegoraro L.F., Silva N.R., and Pashley D.H. Adhesive permeability affects coupling of resin cements that utilise self-etching primers to dentine. J Dent 32 (2004) 55-65
42. Sanares A.M., Itthagarun A., King N.M., Tay F.R., and Pashley D.H. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater 17 (2001) 542-556
43. Tay F.R., Pashley D.H., Yiu C.K., Sanares A.M., and Wei S.H. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent 5 (2003) 27-40
44. Iwami Y., Yamamoto H., and Ebisu S. A new electrical method for detecting marginal leakage of in vitro resin restorations. J Dent 28 (2000) 241-247
45. Castro A., and Feigal R.E. Microleakage of a new improved glass ionomer restorative material in primary and permanent teeth. Pediatric Dent 24 (2002) 23-28