Factors influencing pulpal response to cavity restorations

Dental Materials

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 432-440

  Camps, J ^a   Dejou J ^a   Remusat M ^a   About, I ^a  

^a UFR Odontologie   (France)

Author keywords

Bacterial microleakage; Dentin thickness; Pulpal reaction

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHILD; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PULPITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; TOOTH DISEASE;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PULP EXPOSURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN; HUMANS; PULPITIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0034331732     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00041-5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effect of surgical exposures of dental pulp in germ free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1965;20:340-9.
2. Watts A. Bacterial contamination and the toxicity of silicate and zinc phosphate cements. Br Dent J 1979;146:7-13.
3. Paterson RC. Bacterial contamination and the exposed pulp. Br Dent J 1976;14:231-6.
4. Watts A, Paterson RC. Bacterial contamination as a factor influencing the toxicity of materials to the exposed dental pulp. Oral Med, Oral Surg Oral Pathol 1987;64:466-74.
5. Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 1984;9:57-68.
6. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol 1982;11:439-50.
7. Cox CF, Keall CL, Keall HJ, Ostro E, Bergenholz G. Biocompatibility of surface-sealed dental materials against exposed pulp. J Prosthet Dent 1987;57:1-8.
8. Cox CF, Suzuki S, Suzuki SH, Cox II LK. Histological evaluation of direct pulp capping with various adhesive systems. In: Shimono M, Maeda T, Suda H, Takahashi K, editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Dentin/pulp Complex 1995, Quintessence, 1996. p. 209-16.
9. Qvist V, Staltze K, Qvist J. Human pulp reactions to resin restorations performed with different acid-etch restorative procedures. Acta Odontol Scand 1989;47:253-67.
10. Fujitani M, Inokoshi S, Hosada H. Effect of acid etching on the dental pulp in adhesive composite restorations. Int Dent J 1992;42:3-11.
11. Stanley HR. Pulp irritation tests: restorative materials influencing dentin and pulp. In: Stanley HR, editor. Toxicity testing of dental materials, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1985. p. 91-121.
12. Ibuki T, Kido MA, Kiyoshima T, Terada Y, Tanaka T. An ultrastructural study of the relationship between sensory trigeminal nerves and odontoblasts in rat dentin/pulp as demonstrated by the anterograde transport of wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP). J Dent Res 1996;75:1963-70.
13. Sato O. Response of pulpal nerves to cavity preparation in rat molars: an immunohistochemical study using neurofilament protein (NFP) antiserum. Arch Histol Cytol 1989;52:433-46.
14. Fristad I, Kvinnsland IH, Jonsson R, Heyeraas KJ. Effect of intermittent long-lasting electrical tooth simulation on the pulpal blood flow and immunocompetent cells: a hemodynamic and immunohistochemical study in young rat molars. Exp Neurol 1997;146:230-9.
15. Okiji T, Jontell M, Belichenko P, Dahlgren U, Bergenholtz G, Dahlstrom A. Structural and functional association between substance P- and calcitonin gene related peptide-immunoreactive nerves and accessory cells in the rat dental pulp. J Dent Res 1997;76:1818-24.
16. Hamid A, Hume WR. The effect of dentin thickness on diffusion of resin monomers in vitro. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:20-25.
17. Camps J, Tardieu C, Dejou J, Franquin JC, Ladaique P, Rieu R. In vitro cytotoxicity of dental adhesive systems under simulated pulpal pressure. Dent Mater 1997;13:34-42.
18. Fédération Dentaire International, Commission on Dental Materials, Instruments, Equipments and Therapeutics, Stanford JW. Recommended standard practices for biological evaluation of dental materials. Int Dent J 1980;30:140-8.
19. Piperno J, Barouch E, Hirsch ST, Kaim JM. Thermal discomfort of teeth related to presence or absence of cement bases under amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 1982;7:92-6.
20. Pashley DH, Kepler EE, Williams EC, Okabe A. Progressive decrease in dentin permeability following cavity preparation. Archs Oral Biol 1983;28:853-8.
21. Franquin JC, Brouillet JL. Biocompatibility of an enamel and dentin adhesive under different conditions of application. Quint Int 1988;19:813-26.
22. Elbaum R, Remusat M, Brouillet JL. Biocompatibility of an enamel dentin adhesive. Quint Int 1992;23:773-82.
23. Brown JH, Brenn L. A method for the differential staining of gram positive and gram negative bacteria in tissue sections. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 1931;42:60.
24. Mjör IA. Biological and clinical properties. In: Mjör IA, editor. Dental materials, biological properties and clinical evaluation, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1985. p. 91-121.
25. Mjör IA. Current views on biological testing of restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:503-7.
26. Holz J, Baume LJ, Brännström M, Nordenvall KJ, Torstenson B. Pulpal response to IRM cement; an intermediate restorative material containing eugenol. J Dent Child 1981;48:259-63.
27. Blosser RL, Rupp NW, Stanley HR, Bowen RL. Pulpal and microorganism responses to two experimental dental bonding systems. Dent Mater 1989;5:140-4.
28. Abou Hashieh I, Camps J, Dejou J, Franquin JC. In vitro cytotoxicity of eugenol-based temporary filling materials related to dentin permeability. Dent Mater 1998;14:229-36.
29. Cox CF, White KC, Ramus DL, Farmer JB, Snuggs M. Reparative dentin: factors affecting its deposition. Quint Int 1992;23:257-70.
30. Eick JD, Cobb CM, Chappell RP, Spencer P, Robinson SJ. The dental surface: its influence on dentinal adhesion Part I. Quint Int 1991;22:967-77.
31. Vojinovic O, Nyborg H, Brännström M. Acid treatment of cavities under filling resin: bacterial growth in dentinal tubules and pulpal reactions. J Dent Res 1973;52:1189-93.
32. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. The overwet phenomenon: a scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996;9:109-14.
33. Felton D, Bergenholtz G, Cox CF. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment. J Dent Res 1989;68:491-5.
34. Gerzina TM, Hume WR. Diffusion of monomers from bonding resin-resin composite combinations through dentine in vitro. J Dent 1996;24:125-8.
35. Palenik CJ, Setcos JC. Antimicrobial abilities of various dentine bonding agents and restorative materials. J Dent 1996;24:289-95.
36. Emilson CG, Bergenholtz G. Antibacterial activity of dentinal bonding agents. Quint Int 1993;24:511-5.
37. Meryon SD, Johnson SG. The effects of smear layer removal on the in vitro cytotoxicity of four dental restorative materials. J Dent 1988;16:222-6.
38. Meryon SD, Brook AM. In vitro cytotoxicity of three dentine bonding agents. J Dent 1989;17:279-83.
39. Pashley DH. Dentin-predentin complex and its permeability: physiologic overview. J Dent Res 1985;64:613-20.
40. Abou Hashieh I, Cosset A, Dejou J, Franquin JC, Camps J. Influence of hydraulic conductance of dentine on in vitro cytotoxicity testing. J Dent 1998;26:473-8.
41. Hanks CT, Wataha J, Parsell RR, Stawn SE, Fat JC. Permeability of biological and synthetic molecules through dentine. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:475-87.
42. Felton D, Bergenholz G, Cox CF. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment. J Dent Res 1989;68:491-5.
43. International Organization for Standardization 1994. Dentistry: preclinical evaluation of biocompatibility of medical devices used in dentistry: tests methods. ISO/DIS 7405.
44. Rutherford B, Fitzerald M. A new biological approach to vital pulp therapy. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1995;6:218-29.
45. Mooney DJ, Powell C, Piana J, Rutherford B. Engineering dental pulp-like tissue in vitro. Biotechnol Prog 1996;12:865-8.
46. Dejou J, Remusat M, Franquin JC. Biocompatibility testing of restorative materials influencing dentin and pulp. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:877-84.
47. Pertot WJ, Sindres V, Szekeres G, Proust JP. Model for quantitative immunohistochemical assessment of pulpal response to biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34:457-62.